Page 261 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-Printed GelMA biomaterials in cartilage repair

properties and photocrosslinking capabilities under Availability of data
UV light, GelMA is well-suited for 3D printing and the Not applicable.
construction of complex, multi-layered constructs like
native articular cartilage. Lastly, GelMA shows potential Reference
for creating “smart” scaffolds with self-controlling
bioactive component release in response to biological or 1. Ning L, Chen X, 2017, A brief review of extrusion-based
biochemical cues for targeted deliveries. tissue scaffold bio-printing. Biotechnol J, 12(8).

In conclusion, GelMA is a versatile and well-suited 2. Daly AC, Freeman FE, Gonzalez-Fernandez T, et al., 2017,
3D printing ink for cartilage tissue engineering due to 3D bioprinting for cartilage and osteochondral tissue
its excellent and adaptable characteristics. In the future, engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 6(22).
GelMA-based hydrogels may be utilized to construct more 3. Wu Y, Kennedy P, Bonazza N, et al., 2021, Three-dimensional
biomimetic and intelligent scaffolds for articular cartilage bioprinting of articular cartilage: A systematic review.
tissue engineering. However, addressing limitations in Cartilage, 12(1): 76–92.
controlling the printed material’s pore structure and
optimizing tissue scaffold microenvironments is crucial 4. Messaoudi O, Henrionnet C, Bourge K, et al., 2020, Stem
cells and extrusion 3D printing for hyaline cartilage
for promoting further advancements in cartilage tissue engineering. Cells, 10(1).
engineering.
5. Oveissi F, Naficy S, Lee A, et al., 2020, Materials and
Acknowledgments manufacturing perspectives in engineering heart valves: A
review. Mater Today Bio, 5: 100038.
None.
6. Zhang Y, Chen H, Li J, 2022, Recent advances on gelatin
Funding methacrylate hydrogels with controlled microstructures for
tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol, 221: 91–107.
This work was supported by the Guangzhou science 7. Yilmaz B, Tahmasebifar A, Baran ET, 2020, Bioprinting
and technology project to Aiguo Li or Wen Wang (grant technologies in tissue engineering. Adv Biochem Eng/
number 2023A03J0987, 202002030049, 201704020145) Biotechnol, 171: 279–319.
and by the Oversea Study Program of Guangzhou Elite 8. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, et al., 2018, 3D
Project to Shengnan Qin (N/A).
bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering:
A review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater, 3(2):
Conflict of interest 144–156.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 9. Gorgieva S, Kokol V, 2011, Collagen- vs. gelatine-based
biomaterials and their biocompatibility: Review and
Author contributions perspectives, in Biomaterials Applications for Nanomedicine,
Norderstedt.
Conceptualization: Shengnan Qin
Funding acquisition: Aiguo Li, Wen Wang 10. Vandooren J, Van den Steen PE, Opdenakker G, et al., 2013,
Project administration: Aiguo Li, Wen Wang Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or
Investigation: Shengnan Qin, Liang Chen, Guowei Huang, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Crit Rev Biochem Mol
Biol, 48(3): 222–72.
Ming Yu, Yang Liu, Tao Cheng
Visualization: Shengnan Qin, Liang Chen, Guowei Huang, 11. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and
Writing – original draft: Liang Chen, Guowei Huang, Ming future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting.
Yu, Shengnan Qin Biomaterials, 76(37): 321–343.
Writing – review & editing: Shengnan Qin 12. Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, et al., 2000,
Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide
Ethics approval and consent to participate modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules, 1(1): 31–38.
Not applicable. 13. Kumar H, Sakthivel K, Mohamed MGA, et al., 2021,
Designing gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based bioinks for
Consent for publication visible light stereolithographic 3D biofabrication. Macromol
Biosci, 21(1): e2000317.
Not applicable.
14. Sun M, Sun X, Wang Z, et al., 2018, Synthesis and properties
of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels and their

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 253 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0116