Page 366 - IJB-9-6
P. 366

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Surface modification of PCL scaffolds




            roughness of PCL scaffolds, making them favorable for cell   2.   Stahl A, Yang YP, 2021, Regenerative approaches for the
            proliferation and adhesion. Additionally, osteoinductive   treatment of large bone defects. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 27(6):
            properties were enhanced in vitro and in vivo, likely due   539–547.
            to modified surface-mediated enhancement of osteogenic   https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0281
            differentiation via the integrinα2/β1-PI3K-Akt signaling   3.   Dimitriou R, Jones E, Mcgonagle D,  et al., 2011, Bone
            pathway. These findings suggest that NaOH treatment is a   regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC
            cost-efficient and effective strategy for surface modification   Med, 9: 66.
            of PCL scaffolds in bone tissue regeneration.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-66.
            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Azi ML, Aprato A, Santi I,  et al., 2016, Autologous bone
                                                                  graft in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects: A
            We acknowledge Mrs. Xiaoli Qu for helping the team use   systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMC Musculoskelet
            immunofluorescence microscopy (State Key Laboratory   Disord, 17(1): 465.
            for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong
            University). The Figdraw was acknowledged for producing   https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1312-4
            Scheme 1 and Figure 6F.                            5.   Charbe NB, Tambuwala M, Palakurthi SS,  et al., 2023,
                                                                  Biomedical applications  of three-dimensional  bioprinted
            Funding                                               craniofacial tissue engineering.  Bioeng Transl Med, 8(1):
                                                                  e10333.
            This work was supported by National Natural Science
            Foundation of China (No. 31971272) and International   https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10333
            Science and Technology Cooperation Keg Program project   6.   Shi Y, Yu L, Gong C, et al., 2021, A bioactive magnesium
            of Shaanxi Province (No. 2023-GHZD-25).               phosphate cement incorporating chondroitin sulfate for
                                                                  bone regeneration. Biomed Mater, 16(3).
            Conflict of interest                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c4
            The authors declare no conflicts of interests.     7.   Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, et al., 2017 Scaffolds for bone
                                                                  tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives.
            Author contributions                                  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 78: 1246–1262.
            Conceptualization: Hongbin Fan                        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017
            Formal analysis: Jingyi Dang, Zhao Zhang           8.   Wunner FM, Wille ML, Noonan TG,  et al., 2018, Melt
            Methodology: Yubo Shi, Lei Wang                       electrospinning writing of highly ordered large volume
            Resources: Jiankang He, Zhennan Qiu, Xiaoli, Qu       scaffold architectures. Adv Mater, 30(20): e1706570.
            Writing – original draft: Yubo Shi, Liguo Sun         https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706570
            Writing – review & editing: Yubo Shi, Hongbin Fan
                                                               9.   Kade JC, Dalton PD, 2021, Polymers for melt electrowriting.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Adv Healthc Mater, 10(1): e2001232.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001232
            The animal study was approved by Ethics Committees of The
            Fourth Military Medical University (IACUC-20220071).  10.  Chen Z, Liu Y, Huang J, et al., 2022, Influences of process
                                                                  parameters of near-field direct-writing melt electrospinning
            Consent for publication                               on performances of polycaprolactone/nano-hydroxyapatite
                                                                  scaffolds. Polymers (Basel), 14(16): 3404.
            Not applicable.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163404
            Availability of data                               11.  He J, Zhang B, Li Z,  et al., 2020, High-resolution
                                                                  electrohydrodynamic  bioprinting:  A  new  biofabrication
            The  request  for  raw  data  can  be  directed  to  the   strategy for biomimetic micro/nanoscale architectures and
            corresponding author.                                 living tissue constructs. Biofabrication, 12(4): 042002.

            References                                            https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba1fa
                                                               12.  Mirzaei M, Dodi G, Gardikiotis I,  et al., 2023, 3D high-
            1.   Maruyama T, Stevens R, Boka A, et al., 2021, BMPR1A maintains   precision melt electro written polycaprolactone modified
               skeletal stem cell properties in craniofacial development and   with yeast derived peptides for wound healing.  Biomater
               craniosynostosis. Sci Transl Med, 13(583): eabb4416.  Adv, 149: 213361.
               https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abb4416       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213361


            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        358                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1071
   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371