Page 237 - v11i4
P. 237

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Fine collagen scaffold for osteogenesis




            3. Results                                         Lissajous curves for ink B compared to ink A, indicating
                                                               more linear viscoelastic behavior (Figure 6A). Additionally,
            3.1. FTIR analysis                                 ink B showed A higher strain-hardening ratio (Figure 6B),
            Following the oxidation of cellulose by sodium peroxide,
            the hydroxyl groups (–OH) were converted to  aldehyde   suggesting  better  structural  recovery  and  printability.
            groups. In the FTIR spectra, ink A showed a characteristic   The greater linear rheological characteristic of ink B may
            –OH peak at 1075 cm , which  was markedly  reduced   contribute to its improved shape fidelity during printing.
                               −1 31
            in ink B, indicating successful oxidation. In addition, the   3.3. Morphological study
            characteristic amide peak of collagen I at 1542 cm  was   Cryogenic 3D printing (Figure 7) was attempted using ink
                                                     −1
            prominent in ink A but nearly absent in ink B (Figure 3),   A and B. An optimum combination of pressure and speed
            suggesting its consumption via Schiff-base reactions. 32   parameters was evaluated for each ink until rod breakage

            3.2. Rheological study                             occurred. Printing with ink A was more challenging due
            At the printing temperature of –1 °C, ink A exhibited   to its weaker gelation strength, which limited resolution
            higher viscosity than ink B. This was consistent with its   improvements at higher printing speeds and led to frequent
            lower tan  δ value and steeper stress–strain curve slope,   rod breakage (Figure 7B). In contrast, ink B enabled
            indicating greater stiffness (Figures 4  and  5). Both inks   smoother  printing,  likely  due  to  Schiff-base-induced
            demonstrated shear-thinning  behavior, as  viscosity   structural reinforcement (Figure 7C). As a result, samples
            decreased monotonically with increasing shear rate    1–3 scaffolds were printed using ink B, while sample 4 was
            (Figure 4B). LAOS analysis revealed more flattened   printed using a gelatin-based hydrogel ink.














































            Figure 3. FTIR spectra for ink A (cellulose/collagen I/alginate hydrogel) and B (oxidized cellulose/collagen I/alginate hydrogel). Abbreviation: FTIR:
            Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       229                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025140116
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242