Page 83 - IJOCTA-15-2
P. 83

M. Khelifa et. al. / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.2, pp.264-280 (2025)
            of -4.35%, -7.92%, and -3.99%, respectively. No-  Methodology: Meriem Khelifa
            tably, our approach identifies optimal solutions  Writing – original draft: Meriem Khelifa
            for smaller instances and maintains a general de-  Writing – review & editing:   Meriem Khelifa,
            viation of -1.25% from the best-known solutions.  Harous Saad
            Our approach achieves better results by integrat-
            ing ILP within BBO, combining efficient explo-    Availability of data
            ration with optimal refinement. By migrating the  All the data is included in the paper.
            schedules of certain teams from the best solution
            and optimizing the remainder with ILP, we effec-  References
            tively guide the search toward high-quality solu-
                                                               1. Lamas-Fernandez C, Martinez-Sykora A, Potts
            tions.
                                                                  CN. Scheduling double round-robin sports tour-
                                                                  naments. In: Proceedings of the 13th Interna-
            5. Conclusion
                                                                  tional Conference on the Practice and Theory of
            This study addresses the TTP, a challenging NP-       Automated Timetabling, 2021;2:2021.
            hard problem in the domain of sports scheduling.   2. Van Bulck D, Goossens D, Sch¨onberger J, Gua-
            The goal of the TTP aims to construct DRRT            jardo M. RobinX: A three-field classification
                                                                  and unified data format for round-robin sports
            schedule that reduces the total travel distance for
                                                                  timetabling. Eur J Oper Res. 2020;280(2):568–
            all participating teams.
                                                                  580.
                This study proposes a new hybrid approach
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.023
            that combines exact methods with the BBO meta-
                                                               3. Ribeiro CC. Sports scheduling: Problems and ap-
            heuristic to tackle both the TTP and its variant,     plications. Int Trans Oper Res, 2012;19(1-2):201–
            the UTTP. First,We propose a novel strategy that      226.
            relaxes the ILP formulation of TTP (RILP-TTP)         https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2011.
            to reduce travel costs in DRRT schedules. We          00819.x
            then integrate BBO with RILP-TTP to efficiently    4. Kendall G, Knust S, Ribeiro CC, Urrutia S.
            solve instances of both TTP and UTTP.                 Scheduling in sports: An annotated bibliography.
                The results of our experiments demonstrate        Comput Oper Res., 2010;37(1):1–19.
            that the proposed method offers strong perfor-        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.05.013
            mance achieving the best-known solutions for sev-  5. Dur´an G, Dur´an S, Marenco J, Mascialino F, Rey
            enteen instances and setting new best-known so-       PA. Scheduling Argentina’s professional basket-
            lutions for the sixteen instances of the National     ball leagues: A variation on the travelling tour-
            Leagues US. This performance exceeds that of          nament problem. Eur J Oper Res. 2018.
            several prominent methods when applied to the      6. Khelifa M, Boughaci D. A cooperative local
            TTP.                                                  search method for solving the traveling tourna-
                In our future work, we plan to investigate        ment problem. Comput Inform., 2019;37(6).
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.4149/cai 2 018 61 386
            the incorporation of deep learning techniques into
            metaheuristic methods to tackle further chal-      7. Thielen C, Westphal S. Complexity of the trav-
                                                                  eling tournament problem. Theor Comput Sci.,
            lenges in sports scheduling problems.
                                                                  2011;412(4-5):345–351.
            Acknowledgments                                       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2010.10.001
                                                               8. Bhattacharyya R. Complexity of the uncon-
            None.                                                 strained traveling tournament problem. Oper Res
                                                                  Lett., 2016;44(5):649–654.
            Funding                                               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2016.07.011
            None.                                              9. Irnich S. A new branch-and-price algorithm for
                                                                  the traveling tournament problem. Eur J Oper
            Conflict of interest                                  Res., 2010;204(2):218–228.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.024
            The authors declare that they have no conflict of
                                                              10. Uthus DC, Riddle PJ, Guesgen HW. DFS* and
            interest regarding the publication of this article.
                                                                  the traveling tournament problem. In: Interna-
                                                                  tional Conference on AI and OR Techniques in
            Author contributions
                                                                  Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Opti-
            Conceptualization: Meriem Khelifa                     mization Problems, 2009; 279–293. Springer.
            Formal analysis: Meriem Khelifa, Harous Saad,         https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01929-6 2 1
            Mezzoud Saliha                                    11. Challenge  Traveling  Tournament  Instances.
            Investigation: Meriem Khelifa, Mohammed               Available from: http://mat.tepper.cmu.edu/T
                                                                  OURN [Accessed 29 January 2016].
            Abdelaziz Hacini
                                                           278
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88