Page 127 - IJOCTA-15-3
P. 127

Investigate the solution of an initial Hilfer fractional value problem
            and                                               Conflict of interest
                                    1
                     g (s, φ (s)) =     sin(|φ(s)|).
                                   2
                                  s + 1                       The authors declare no conflict of interest.
            Hence, we find that
                                                          Author contributions
              f (s, φ) − f (s, ¯φ) ≤ ln(1 + |φ|) − ln(1 + | ¯φ|)

                                                              Conceptualization: Amol D. Khandagale, Arif S.
                                        1 + |φ|

                 f (s, φ) − f (s, ¯φ) = ln
                                                            Bagwan, Sabri T. M. Thabet
                                        1 + | ¯φ|
                                                              Formal analysis: Arif S. Bagwan, Sabri T. M.

                                             |φ| − | ¯φ|
                                   = ln 1 +                   Thabet and Imed Kedim
                                              1 + | ¯φ|       Investigation: Arif S. Bagwan, Sabri T. M. Tha-

                                             |φ − ¯φ|         bet, Imed Kedim
                                   ≤ ln 1 +
                                             1 + | ¯φ|        Methodology: All authors
                                                              Writing-original draft: Arif S. Bagwan, Sabri T.
                                   ≤ ln (1 + |φ − ¯φ|)
                                                              M. Thabet
                                   ≤ ψ D (|φ − ¯φ|) ,         Writing-review & editing: Arif S. Bagwan, Sabri
                             1
            for each s ∈ (0, ], where ψ D (s) = ln(1 + s) is  T. M. Thabe
                             2
            a D−function, such that 0 < ψ D (0) = 0 and
            ψ D (s) < s, that is h(s) = s − ln(1 + s), we have  Availability of data
                                              1
              ′
            h (s) = 1 −  1  = s > 0, for s ∈ (0, ]. Also,
                        1+s                   2
                                                              Not applicable.
                                       1
                      |g (s, φ (s)) | ≤    = ξ(s).
                                     2
                                    s + 1
                                                              AI tools statement
            Additionally, (q − p) 1−κ  ≈ 0.84 < 1. Therefore,
            all assumptions of Theorem 2 are satisfied, it im-  All authors confirm that no AI tools were used in
            plies that the IVP (18)–(19) possesses a solution  the preparation of this manuscript.
            in C 1−κ (J , R).
                                                              References
            5. Conclusions
                                                               1. Hilfer R. Fractional Time Evolution: Applications
            In this article, a Hilfer FDE with linear pertur-     of Fractional Calculus in Physics. London: World
            bations of the second type under a certain initial    Scientific; 2000.
            condition was discussed for the existence of the   2. Smart DR. Fixed Point Theorems. Cambridge
            solution. An equivalent VIE is obtained for the       University Press; 1973.
            IVP (1)–(2). The main result on the existence of   3. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ. Theory
                                                                  and Applications of Fractional Differential Equa-
            the solution to IVP was established employing the
                                                                  tions. Amsterdam:Elsevier; 2006.
            Krasnoselskii–Dhage type fixed-point theorem in
                                                               4. Miller KS, Ross B. An Introduction to the Frac-
            the weighted Banach space. At the end, an appli-
                                                                  tional Calculus and Differential E quations. New
            cation was given to check the validity of the out-
                                                                  York: John Wiley; 1993.
            comes. The initial value problem discussed in this  5. Abdeljawad T, Thabet STM, Kedim I, and Cortez
            paper along with the fractional derivative opera-     VM. On a new structure of multi-term Hilfer frac-
            tor considered in the IVP (1)–(2) generalizes the     tional impulsive neutral Levin-Nohel integrodif-
            existing results available in the literature. In IVP  ferential system with variable time delay. AIMS
            (1)–(2) if we put τ = 1, then the results obtained    Math. 2024;9(3):7372-7395.
            in the paper coincide with the results published   6. Rezapour S, Thabet STM, Rafeeq AS, Kedim
            in. 32,33  However, it could be interesting to see the  I, Vivas-Cortez M, Aghazadeh N. Topology de-
            impact of the inclusion of the control term in IVP    gree results on a G-ABC implicit fractional dif-
                                                                  ferential equation under three-point boundary
            (1)–(2). This idea may be an open problem for fu-
                                                                  conditions. PLoS ONE 2024; 19(7): e0300590.
            ture investigations.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300590
                                                               7. Salim A, Thabet STM , Kedim I, Vivas-
            Acknowledgments
                                                                  Cortez M. On the nonlocal hybrid (k, φ)-
            This study is supported via funding from Prince       Hilfer inverse problem with delay and antici-
            Sattam bin Abdulaziz University project number        pation. AIMS Math. 2024;9(8):  22859–22882.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241112
            (PSAU/2025/R/1446).
                                                               8. Ahmad B, Ntouyas SK. Initial value problem
            Fundings                                              of fractional order Hadamard-type functional
                                                                  differential equations. Electron J Differ Equat.
            None.                                                 2015;2015:1-9.
                                                           499
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132