Page 194 - IJOCTA-15-4
P. 194

E.M. Shaban / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.4, pp.728-737 (2025)
            Author contributions                                  hemivariational inequalities. Chaos Solitons Frac-
                                                                  tals. 2024;188:115558.
            Conceptualization: Saim Ahmed, Ahmad Taher
                                                              13. Ma Y-K, Raja MM, Nisar KS, Shukla A,
            Azar
                                                                  Vijayakumar V. Results on controllability for
            Formal analysis: All authors                          sobolev type fractional dif- ferential equations
            Investigation: Saim Ahmed, Ahmad Taher Azar           of order 1¡ r¡ 2 with finite delay. AIMS Math.
            Methodology: Saim Ahmed, Ahmad Taher Azar             2022;7(6):10215–10233.
            Writing – original draft: Saim Ahmed              14. Raja MM, Vijayakumar V, Veluvolu KC, Shukla
            Writing – review & editing: All authors               A, Nisar KS. Existence and optimal control re-
                                                                  sults for caputo fractional delay clark’s subdiffer-
            Availability of data                                  ential inclusions of order order r ∈ (1, 2) with
                                                                  sectorial operators. Optim Control Appl Methods.
            Not applicable.                                       2024;45(4):1832–1850.
                                                              15. Lavretsky E, Kevin W, Howe D. Robust and adap-
            AI tools statement                                    tive control with aerospace applications. England:
                                                                  Springer- Verlag London, 2013.
            All authors confirm that no AI tools were used in
                                                              16. Lewis FL, Dawson DM, Abdallah CT. Robot
            the preparation of this manuscript.
                                                                  manipulator control: Theory and practice. CRC
                                                                  Press, 2003.
            References
                                                              17. Zhou X, Tian Y, Wang H. Neural network state
              1. Ajel AR. Robust model reference adaptive control  observer-based robust adaptive fault-tolerant
                for tail-sitter vtol aircraft. Actuators. 2021;10(7).  quantized iterative learning control for the rigid-
              2. Lavretsky E. Adaptive control:  Introduction,    flexible coupled robotic systems with unknown
                overview, and applications. Lecture notes IEEE    time delays. Appl Math Comput. 2022;430:127286.
                Robust Adapt. Control Workshop 208; 2008.     18. Zhou X, Wang H, Wu K, Zheng G. Fixed-
              3. Dan Z, Bin W. A review on model reference adap-  time neural network trajectory tracking control
                tive control of robotic manipulators. Annu Rev    for the rigid-flexible coupled robotic mechanisms
                Control. 2017;43:188–198.                         with large beam- deflections. Appl Math Model.
              4. Xiao Shunli LJ, Yangmin L. A model reference     2023;118:665–691.
                adaptive pid control for electromagnetic actu-  19. Ghazi, Farah F., and Luma NM Tawfiq. Design
                ated micro-positioning stage. In 2012 IEEE Inter-  optimal neural network based on new LM training
                national Conference on Automation Science and     algorithm for solving 3D-PDEs. An International
                Engineering (CASE), IEEE, 2012;97–102.            Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories &
              5. Gol´ea N, Gol´ea A, Kadjoudj M. Nonlinear        Applications (IJOCTA). 2024;14(3):249-260.
                model reference adaptive control using takagi-  20. Wang Y, Yan F, Chen J, Ju F, Chen
                sugeno fuzzy systems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst.        B.   A    new   adaptive   time-delay  con-
                2006;17(1):47–57.                                 trol   scheme    for   cable-driven  manip-
              6. Guo L, Parsa L. Model reference adaptive control  ulators.  IEEE    Trans    Ind   Informat.
                of five-phase ipm motors based on neural network.  2018;15(6):3469–3481.
                IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2011;59(3):1500–1508.  21. Wang Y, Li B, Yan F, Chen B. Practi-
              7. Wu C, Zhao J. H∞ adaptive tracking control for   cal adaptive fractional-order nonsingular ter-
                switched systems based on an average dwell-time   minal sliding mode control for a cable-driven
                method. Int J Syst Sci. 2015;46(14):2547–2559.    manipulator. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control
              8. Fang Y, Fei J, Ma K. Model reference adaptive    2019;29(5):1396–1417.
                sliding mode control us- ing rbf neural network  22. Youcef-Toumi  K,  Wu  S-T.  Input/output
                for active power filter. Int J Electr Power Energy  linearization  using  time  delay  control.
                Syst. 2015;73:249–258.                            1992;114(1):10–19.
              9. U¸cak K, Arslant¨urk BN. Adaptive mimo fuzzy pid  23. Long Y, Liu X, Yao C, Song E. Model-
                controller based on peak observer. Int J Optim    free adaptive full-order sliding mode control
                Control Theor Appl. 2023;13(2).                   with time delay estimation of high- pres-
             10. Ahmed S, Wang H, Tian Y. Modification to model   sure common rail system. J Vib Control.
                reference adaptive control of 5-link exoskeleton  2024;10775463241256225.
                with gravity compensation. In 2016 35th Chinese  24. Ahmed S, Azar AT, Ibraheem IK. Model-free
                Control Conference (CCC), 2016;6115–6120.         scheme using time delay estimation with fixed-
             11. Nguyen N, Summers E. On time delay margin es-    time fsmc for the non- linear robot dynamics.
                timation for adaptive control and robust modifi-  AIMS Math. 2024;9(4):9989–10009.
                cation adaptive laws. In AIAA Guidance, naviga-  25. Yadegari  H,  Beyramzad  J,  Khanmirza  E.
                tion, and control conference 2011;6438.           Magnetorquers-based satellite attitude control us-
             12. Raja MM, Vijayakumar V, Veluvolu KC. Im-         ing interval type-ii fuzzy terminal sliding mode
                proved order in hilfer fractional differential sys-  control with time delay estimation. Adv Space Res
                tems: Solvability and optimal control problem for  2022;69(8):3204–3225.
                                                           736
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199