Page 123 - IJPS-10-3
P. 123

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                               COVID-19 and low-skilled workforce in the EU

































            Figure 1. Proportions of natives, intra-EU mobile workers, and non-EU migrant workers in key occupations. Note: Occupations are defined following
            ISCO two-digit classification.
            Source: Fasani & Mazza (2020a).
            informal conditions (Foley & Piper, 2020; Dotsey, 2021;   et al., 2020; van Hooren, 2020). Notwithstanding low-skilled
            Giammarinaro & Palumbo, 2020; Sanfelici, 2021). At the   migrants’ significant contributions to EU economies, they
            other  end  of  the  spectrum,  caregivers  also  experienced   are often overlooked in migration discussions and policy
            reduced working hours and wages, lost income, or   initiatives. Migration policies in many EU countries have
            faced increased risk of unemployment due to decreased   focused primarily on closing or fortifying internal and
            economic activities (Foley & Piper, 2020; Sanfelici, 2021).   external borders and pushing back unwanted immigrants
            Some live-in domestic care workers were laid off, thereby   while attracting high-skilled migrants.
            losing a place to stay (ILO, 2020). In addition, individuals   Low-skilled  migration  is  an  intensely  contentious
            employed in institutional settings, even those on stable   topic. The distribution of low-skilled migrants in key
            contracts, experienced reduced working hours, layoffs, or   sectors exposed them disproportionately to precarious and
            the constant fear of losing their jobs due to the closure of   vulnerable conditions. The pandemic further restricted
            their wards following COVID-19 deaths and/or a minimal   labor mobility and migration, constraining further labor
            admission of new patients (Dotsey et al., 2023). Therefore,   choices with implications for vulnerability to exploitation.
            the pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities, unstable   While low-skilled migration in the care sector, for example,
            environments, and severe socioeconomic repercussions   is essential to EU economies, the group of migrants
            faced by the frail and high-risk populations. The decrease   working in this sector has remained outside EU policy
            in purchasing power has put the already vulnerable groups   initiatives related to labor migration management over the
            who are more likely to work in informal sectors, including   years (Triandafyllidou & Marchetti, 2014). The pandemic
            women,  refugees,  low-skilled  workers,  and  irregular   has reaffirmed the essential role of low-skilled migrants
            migrants, at increased risks of being exploited and abused.  in  EU  economies,  showing  that  these  migrant  groups
                                                               cannot be excluded from public policy and debates. It is
            4. Low-skilled workers, COVID-19, and              thus a clarion call to all EU Member States to individually
            labor migration: Time to call the shots?           and collectively craft policies to improve the inclusion
            The pandemic has highlighted the role of migrants,   of marginalized populations, particularly low-skilled
            including low-skilled migrants, as frontline workers in key   migrants, in their public and immigration policies to create
            sectors in the EU (Isaac & Elrick, 2021). Recent research   situations wherein all parties could benefit.
            and policy papers show that the public has recognized the   This commentary offers some practical policy
            crucial role of migrants during the pandemic in keeping   recommendations for the inclusion of the low-skilled
            essential service sectors functioning (Fernández-Reino   migrant workforce in the public and migration policies. In

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       117                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2165
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128