Page 15 - IJPS-10-3
P. 15

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                  The use of multiregional life tables in Italy




            Table 1. Comparison of life expectancy at birth estimated by multiregional approach and estimated by Istat. Italian
            macroregions, 2002-2013
            Birth cohort                     Males                                      Females
                             Multiregional    Istat      Differences*   Multiregional    Istat      Differences*
                              2002–2004       2004                       2002–2004       2004
            Northwest           76.83         77.80        −0.97            82.63        83.80         −1.17
            Northeast           77.48         78.26        −0.77            83.42        84.16         −0.74
            Center              77.95         78.27        −0.32            83.42        83.70         −0.28
            South               77.56         77.62        −0.06            82,99        82.97         0.03
                              2005–2007       2007                       2005–2007       2007
            Northwest           78.40         78.70        −0.30            83.59        84.17         −0.59
            Northeast           78.83         79.11        −0.28            84.21        84.52         −0.30
            Center              79.05         78.96         0.08            84.52        84.19         0.32
            South               78.55         78.02         0.53            83.32        83.09         0.24
                              2008–2010       2010                       2008–2010       2010
            Northwest           79.07         79.35        −0.27            84.15        84.48         −0.32
            Northeast           79.40         79.78        −0.38            84.64        84.97         −0.33
            Center              79.56         79.46         0.10            84.53        84.44         0.09
            South               78.88         78.70         0.17            84.10        83.62         0.48
                              2011–2013       2013                       2011–2013       2013
            Northwest           79.70         80.04        −0.34            84.59        84.89         −0.30
            Northeast           80.12         80.36        −0.24            84.83        85.19         −0.35
            Center              80.03         80.04        −0.01            84.76        84.77         −0.01
            South               79.66         79.16         0.50            84.75        83.91         0.84
            Notes: *Istat data minus multiregional life table birth-dependent approach data.
            Source: Authors’ elaborations based on Istat data (estimates).

            life tables are equal to the values included between −1.5   in another macro-area with a total of 5.7%, 8.2 percentage
            and +1.5 (Rogers, 1995). Table 1 confirms what is already   points less than in the south. In addition, 2.1% of e0 live
            known: e0 is increasing over time  for both males and   in the northwest, the macroregion that is marked by the
            females and the gender differential is decreasing in all birth   highest percentage. Second place  in  the  ranking  is the
            cohorts. What is more interesting is to investigate where   south (1.9%), which shows an important role played by
            each birth cohort resides over their years of life expectancy,   distance and returns (Bonifazi & Heins, 2017). Those born
            an operation that of course can only be achieved using the   in the northwest and in the northeast make up 4.7% and
            multiregional life table.                          4.4% of e0, respectively. If those born in the northwest
              Figure 4 shows, for males, the percentage of years of   comprise the main share of e0 in the northeast (2%), in the
            e0 lived outside the birth macroregion distinctly for each   same way, the cohort born in the northeast mainly lives its
            birth cohort. The birth cohorts are on the x-axis, while   e0 in the northwest (2.2%). Moreover, in all 4 time periods
            the macroregions where the years of e0 are lived are   considered, the northeast has the lowest e0 spent in the
            differentiated by color. As predicted, the trend of time is the   south (1% in 2011 – 2013).
            one described above with respect to survivorship: for both   Figure 5 compares the percentage of male and female
            males and for females, the trend is decreasing from the first   e0 in those living outside the macroregion of birth. Using
            3 years (2002 – 2004) to the second (2005 – 2007) and then   percentages, it was possible to control the highest mortality
            reversed in the last 3 years (2011 – 2013). Males born in the   of males and to make more effective gender comparisons.
            south in 2011 – 2013 live outside the birth macroregion for   When the rectangle is above the x-axis, e0 in areas lived
            14.4% of their e0 (5.8% in the northwest, 4.6% in the center   outside the macroregion of birth is higher for males. The
            and 4% in the northeast). Considering the other birth   opposite is true when the rectangle is below the x-axis. For
            cohorts, the percentages are much lower. Central Italy is   cohorts born in the northwest and northeast, females have
            the second macroregion of birth for a life expectancy lived   higher percentages of years lived outside the macroregion


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                        9                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1898
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20