Page 61 - IJPS-11-1
P. 61

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                              Macroeconomic factors and housing dynamics



            the benchmark model, the share of newly constructed houses   financial assets keep decreasing and are used to finance
            relative to GDP is lower than in the early retirement scenario,   expenditures on consumption and housing services.
            where individuals increase their investment in real property   Figure 2 shows the life-cycle profiles of individual variables
            to offset the loss in retirement benefits. Both capital-output   under a decreasing population scenario. Compared to the
            ratios rise by 11%, and households’ financial assets are higher
            than in the benchmark economy. The shift in labor from the   benchmark model, the entire savings curve shifts downward.
            non-durable to the durable goods industry is driven by the   The declining demand leads to reduced production, which
            increased demand for housing.                      further decreases the demand for input factors, resulting in a
                                                               lower interest rate than in the benchmark.
            3.3. Life-cycle profiles                             With a decreasing population, per capita housing service

            In this section, we examine the impact of technology   consumption is slightly higher. Housing services not only
            and demographic changes on life-cycle consumption   provide utility to households but also serve as a financial
            patterns and financial assets. Figure 1 displays individual   investment. In the benchmark model, housing assets
            lifetime consumption from ages 21 to 85, with the   constitute 37.2% of total wealth, whereas in the decreasing
            coordinate 0 corresponding to age 20. Notably, all   population model, this share increases to 39.2%. This rise
            Figures (Figures 1-4) are smoothed using a polynomial   in housing service consumption significantly dampens the
            trendline function.                                consumption, leading to more compressed non-durable
              Figure  1  illustrates the results of the benchmark   consumption with smaller variance. Although per capita
            model, showing that with housing market friction, the   housing  consumption  rises,  the  need  for  new  housing
            consumption of durable goods is more dispersed than that   construction diminishes due to the shrinking population.
            of non-durable goods. The savings curve, representing a   The labor and capital shift toward the consumption sector,
            household’s financial assets, indicates that the household   as evidenced by the increase in the ratio of labor in the
            repays  their  mortgage before age 40.  After  that,  the   consumption sector to total labor.


                         A                                  B














                         Figure 1. Benchmark results. (A) Lifecycle consumption and housing service expenditures. (B) Lifecycle savings.
                                           Abbreviations: Ct: Consumption; Ht: Housing service.

                         A                                  B














               Figure 2. Alternative economy with decreasing population. (A) Lifecycle consumption and housing service expenditures. (B) Lifecycle savings.
                                           Abbreviations: Ct: Consumption; Ht: Housing service.





            Volume 11 Issue 1 (2025)                        55                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3645
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66