Page 86 - IJPS-11-2

International Journal of
Population Studies Multigenerational evaluation of globalization

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants
Sl. Unique Group Sex Age Education Occupation Residence Marital No. of Type of No of
No. ID status children family siblings
1. ID_01 Pre-G M 81 10 grade Farmer Rural Married 2 Nuclear 2
th
2. ID_02 Pre-G F 87 Graduate Retired (Teacher) Rural Married 3 Joint 6
3. ID_03 Pre-G M 75 Postgraduate Retired (Teacher) Urban Unmarried 0 Joint 5
4. ID_04 Pre-G M 77 10 grade Retired (Air force) Rural Married 3 Nuclear 2
th
5. ID_05 Pre-G M 66 Postgraduate Retired Urban Married 1 Nuclear 1
6. ID_06 Pre-G M 64 Postgraduate Retired Rural Married 3 Nuclear 3
7. ID_07 Pre-G M 77 Postgraduate Retired (Teacher) Urban Married 2 Nuclear 2
8. ID_08 Pre-G F 69 10 grade Retired Urban Married 2 Nuclear 11
th
9. ID_09 Pre-G F 81 Postgraduate Retired (Teacher) Urban Married 3 Nuclear 10
10. ID_10 Pre-G F 67 10 grade Retired Urban Married 3 Nuclear 13
th
11. ID_11 Tran-G M 60 Graduate Business Rural Married 2 Nuclear 3
12. ID_12 Tran-G M 58 Graduate Farmer Rural Married 3 Nuclear 3
13. ID_13 Tran-G M 48 Postgraduate Bank manager Rural Married 1 Nuclear 2
14. ID_14 Tran-G M 52 Graduate Farmer Rural Married 2 Joint 6
15. ID_15 Tran-G M 46 Postgraduate Bank manager Urban Married 2 Nuclear 3
16. ID_16 Tran-G F 46 Postgraduate Teacher Rural Married 2 Nuclear 2
17. ID_17 Tran-G F 47 Postgraduate Teacher Rural Married 2 Nuclear 3
18. ID_18 Tran-G F 45 Postgraduate Homemaker Rural Married 1 Joint 5
19. ID_19 Tran-G F 46 Graduate Business Rural Married 2 Nuclear 1
20. ID_20 Tran-G F 44 Postgraduate Teacher Rural Married 1 Nuclear 8
21. ID_21 Cont-G M 22 Graduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Joint 3
22. ID_22 Cont-G M 23 Graduate Student Urban Unmarried 0 Nuclear 0
23. ID_23 Cont-G M 23 Graduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Nuclear 1
24. ID_24 Cont-G M 23 Graduate Student Urban Unmarried 0 Nuclear 2
25. ID_25 Cont-G M 23 Graduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Nuclear 1
26. ID_26 Cont-G F 25 Graduate Student Urban Unmarried 0 Nuclear 2
27. ID_27 Cont-G F 24 Graduate Student Urban Unmarried 0 Nuclear 2
28. ID_28 Cont-G F 22 Graduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Nuclear 3
29. ID_29 Cont-G F 27 Postgraduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Nuclear 2
30. ID_30 Cont-G F 25 Graduate Student Rural Unmarried 0 Nuclear 2
Notes: Pre-G: Pre-globalization generation; Cont-G: Contemporary young generation; Trans-G: Transition generation; F: Female; M: Male.

transcripts, noting pertinent quotes, and simultaneously and six sub-themes were finalized when the codes were
assigning codes. Following the completion of independent combined.
coding processes, the coders collaboratively reviewed the
developed codes, reached a consensus, and finalized the 2.5. Ethical consideration
codes. A total of 51 codes were identified as pertinent to All participants provided informed consent and clarified
the scope of the study. Later, to generate themes and sub- that their participation was voluntary. Before the
themes, researchers combined similar codes or those that interview, participants read and agreed to an informed
appeared to belong under a generic umbrella theme. Each consent form. They were made aware that they could
theme was then titled based on what the codes collectively leave the interview at any moment. No personally
represented. After the theme generation process, the identifiable information was gathered. Confidentiality
themes were reviewed and finalized by assessing the and anonymity were given the utmost consideration.
significance of each theme. Finally, nine major themes Participants were also assured that the data would be

Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025) 80 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2404