Page 107 - IJPS-11-4
P. 107

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Intergenerational transfers in Malaysia



            Since 2020, Malaysia has become a country with an aging   perspective of respondents and their parents, as well as
            population. As of 2022, there are about 2.4 million persons   respondents and their children.
            in Malaysia who are 65  years of age or older (DOSM,   Living in a multigenerational household that extends
            2022). Malaysia is projected to become a country with an   to three generations is quite common in Malaysia. For
            aged population by 2040.                           example, in MARS Wave-1 data, it is found that 10.8%
              The aging population in Malaysia presents significant   of respondents live together with their children and
            challenges since it puts more strain on those of working   parents under the same roof. The household structure
            age, particularly the “sandwiched generation,” who must   can be a significant factor in determining the pattern of
            financially provide for their parents and children at the   intergenerational transfers in Malaysia.
            same  time.  For  every  100  persons  of  working  age,  the   In this paper, three research questions will be addressed:
            old-age dependency ratio is predicted to rise from 7.4 in   (1)  What are the patterns and flow of intergenerational
            2010 to 21.7 in 2040 (DOSM, 2016). There will be more   transfers in Malaysia, whether upstream or
            older people who need to be supported by the working-age   downstream?
            population in the future.                          (2)  How do sociodemographic and socioeconomic
              Meanwhile, the fertility rate fell below the 2.1 national   backgrounds affect the pattern of intergenerational
            replacement level in 2021, falling from 4.9 children per   transfers in Malaysia?
            woman in 1970 to 1.6 in 2022 (DOSM, 2023). The reasons   (3)  What motivates intergenerational  transfers  in
            behind Malaysian women’s declining fertility rate can be   Malaysia?
            attributed to the increasing participation of women in the   Findings from this study can help policymakers better
            labor force, delay in marriage among women, and the spike   comprehend Malaysia’s aging population, especially with
            in childcare costs in recent years (Bakar & Abdulah, 2010;   regard  to  old-age  financial  security.  Furthermore,  it  can
            Hartani et al., 2015; Jones, 2007; Tey et al., 2012; Tang &   serve as valuable input in policy formulation to improve
            Tey, 2017).                                        coverage and adequacy of existing social protection
              Concerns  about  income  security  and  the  ability  of   programs, strengthen family support systems, and raise
            most Malaysian adults to live well in old age are a result   public awareness on the importance of having good
            of several structural problems, including the lack of social   financial management.
            protection coverage and adequacy, as well as low earnings
            that result in poor retirement savings. As a result, transfers   1.1. Motives, flow, and factors associated with
            from  family  members  are  a  major  source  of  income  for   intergenerational transfers
            many Malaysian individuals, particularly older persons   Willis (1979) proposed the old-age security hypothesis, in
            (Masud et al., 2008). Strong familial ties and a culture of   which individuals in traditional society rely on transfers
            filial piety are also common among Malaysians (Aziz &   from their children for financial security during old age.
            Yusooff, 2012). Therefore, intergenerational transfers are a   Financial support given to parents may occur out of the
            recurrent pattern among Malaysian families, independent   altruistic  behavior  of  the children (Becker,  1974).  It can
            of their motivations, which could either be driven by old-  also act as an exchange or payment for services provided
            age security, unselfish altruism, or even paying back earlier   by the parents such as taking care of grandchildren and
            educational expenditures made for the children (Lillard &   helping with domestic chores (Bernheim et al., 1985). The
            Willis, 1997).                                     parental repayment theory, which holds that parents may
              The flow and direction of intergenerational transfers are   receive financial assistance in exchange for prior human
            determined by a number of factors. The intergenerational   capital expenditures they made, such as paying for their
            transfer debate is important because the average family size   children’s education, is another primary driver (Becker &
            in Malaysia is expected to become smaller due to declining   Tomes, 1976).
            birth rates and fertility rates. As a result, financial support   Intergenerational financial transfers, particularly
            from families will soon decline, as evidenced in numerous   upstream transfers from younger to older generations,
            studies (Chou, 2010; Knodel et al., 2000; Logan & Bian,   are commonly observed in developing countries due to a
            2003; Zimmer & Kwong, 2003).                       lack of formal pension coverage and stable income during
              Using Malaysia Ageing and Retirement Survey      retirement  (Chan,  2005;  Knodel  et al.,  2000;  Lillard  &
            (MARS) Wave-1 data, this study intends to analyze the   Willis, 1997; Logan & Bian, 2003, Zimmer & Kwong, 2003).
            factors associated with the amount of intergenerational   There  are  also  several  past  studies  documenting  the
            transfers between three generations in Malaysia, from the   factors associated with the amount of intergenerational


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       101                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1326
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112