Page 108 - IJPS-11-4
P. 108

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Intergenerational transfers in Malaysia



            financial transfers. Overall, it has been observed that   or gave financial and non-financial support (e.g.,
            respondents who are younger, male, working adults, better   providing food or clothing, looking after grandchildren,
            educated, have higher incomes, are healthier, and have   assisting parents in daily activities,  etc.) from and to
            more parents or children tend to provide greater financial   their parents,  siblings,  and  children. For financial
            support to their parents or children. At the same time, they   support, respondents were  asked  to  indicate which
            receive  less  financial  assistance  in  return.  Conversely,  it   family members they give or receive financial support
            has been shown that older, female, lower-income, and less   from, their frequency (either on a monthly or yearly
            educated people give their parents or children less money   basis), and the amount in Ringgit Malaysia (RM). For
            but also receive more from them (Chou, 2010; Khan, 2013;   respondents who live together with their children or
            Logan & Bian, 2003, Masud et al., 2008; Sloan et al., 2002).   parents, the survey asked them to indicate the amount
            Living arrangements were also found to be a significant   of  financial  support  that  is  excluded  from  any shared
            predictor of intergenerational transfers (Silverstein et al.,   living costs such as rent, utility, and food. The sample
            2006).                                             is chosen among respondents who still have living
              Varying patterns of intergenerational transfers may   children or parents.
            also be seen across ethnic groups as a result of differences   2.1. Statistical analysis and conceptual framework
            in their cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. For
            instance, Bumiputera (including Malay, and Bumiputera   To determine the distribution of intergenerational transfers,
            Sabah, and Sarawak) has the lowest mean household   descriptive analysis was first conducted on all dependent
            income, at RM 7,093, compared to Chinese (RM 9,895)   and independent variables. This was followed by bivariate
            and Indian (RM 8,216) (DOSM, 2019). Therefore,     analysis. Subsequently, multiple linear regression analysis
            Bumiputera is expected to be more dependent on     was performed to examine the significant factors that are
            financial transfers from their parents and children,   associated with the amount of intergenerational financial
            compared to other ethnic groups. On the other hand,   transfers between respondents and their children or
            considering their greater financial capacity, respondents   parents. IBM SPSS 26.0 was used to conduct the statistical
            who are Chinese and Indian are anticipated to provide   analysis for this study.
            more financial transfers to their parents and children.   This study has four dependent variables to indicate
            However, Bumiputera (Sabah and Sarawak) are expected   four different flows of intergenerational financial
            to receive lesser financial transfers from their parents or   transfers, particularly to and from respondents and
            children while providing it at a lesser amount than Malay.   children, as well as to and from respondents and parents.
            This can be supported by the fact that Sabah and Sarawak   The  dependent  variables  were  derived  from  the  total
            have the second and sixth lowest median household   amount of financial transfers between respondents
            income, respectively, among all states and territories in   and their children or parents. These amounts were
            Malaysia.
                                                               transformed into logarithmic form to mitigate data
            2. Data and methods                                skewness and ensure a normal distribution. Since the
                                                               dependent variables are expressed in the natural log
            MARS Wave-1 is a nationwide longitudinal survey on aging   form, the interpretation of their coefficients in the
            and retirement that was carried out between 2018 and 2019   multiple regression models is made in percentage
            by the Social Wellbeing Research Centre (SWRC). MARS   terms. The financial transfer amount that is recorded
            Wave 1 involved 5,613 respondents aged 40 years and older   on  an  annual  basis  is  converted  into  a  monthly  basis
            living in Malaysia.                                for standardization. The conceptual framework for this
              MARS Wave-1 is part of the harmonized database   study is illustrated in Figure 1.
            including the U.S. Health and Retirement Survey; Survey of   The independent variables for this study include
            Health, Ageing, and Retirement Europe; and the Japanese   age,  gender, ethnicity,  education,  marital  status,  living
            Study of Ageing and Retirement. MARS has 260 questions   arrangement, employment status, health status, number
            that fall under five main components: background   of living parents/children, income, and financial assistance
            information of  the  respondents  and family  members,   received from the government. All the independent
            health and health care utilization, work, and employment,   variables are categorical. This study hypothesizes that there
            income and expenditure, as well as savings and assets.  are significant variations in the factors associated with
              With  regards  to  the  intergenerational  transfers,   intergenerational transfers that took place between the
            MARS respondents were asked whether they received   respondents and their children or parents.



            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       102                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1326
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113