Page 45 - IJPS-5-1
P. 45

Mirembe, et al.

              of the individual concerned. International migration also covers movements of refugees, displaced persons, and other
              persons forced to leave their country (United Nations, 2003).
                 Today, the world has the largest youth generation in human history. There are 1.8 billion young people living on the
              planet with approximately 85% of them living in developing states (United Nations, 2019). The number of youth migrants
              has continued to grow rapidly over the past 15 years because migration has become one of the mechanisms through
              which most youths try to escape the vicious cycle of poverty as a result of the high unemployment rates in the area/
              country of origin. Youth migrants constitute a relatively large proportion of international migrants, and their movement
              has a significant impact on origin, transit, and destination countries or communities (United Nations, 2013). In addition
              to that, 30% of all migrants are between ages of 20 and 29 and female youth migrants account for approximately 50% of
              international migrant population (United Nations, 2013). Africa is the world’s youngest continent, as the proportion of
              youth among the region’s total population is higher than in any other continent. In 2010, 70% of the region’s population
              was under the age of 30 (United Nations, 2011) and in 2015, 52% of the migrants were youth migrants (United Nations,
              2016).
                 Uganda being a politically stable country has over the years been a host country for majority of the refugees especially
              those from neighboring war-torn areas. The country has the youngest population with 78% below 30 years (Uganda
              Bureau of Statistics, 2014). Ugandan young labor force is rapidly growing, and it almost doubled in the past decade from
              4.2 million in 2005-2006 to an estimated 9.5 million in 2015 (Goldin, Hobson, Glick et al., 2015). In 2017, 16% of the
              population had lived in another place before their current residence. Of these, 18% were females and 14% were males.
              This means that more migrants are leaving their places of origin to new destination areas (Uganda Bureau of Statistics,
              2017). On the other hand, unemployment and underemployment are big issues that youth in the country face. The overall
              unemployment rate stands at 9.4% and is particularly high among youth (60% of the unemployed) and those with higher
              levels of education. According to the Uganda National Planning Authority (NPA), the youth unemployment rate reaches
              up to 37.8% when including volunteers and unpaid family workers (National Planning Authority, 2015).
              1.1. Rationale
              Youth decisions have a significant impact not only on their own lives and opportunities for human development but also
              on the lives of their societies and communities, both in the short and long term. Youth migrants always find themselves
              in irregular situations and face situations of exploitation, trafficking, exclusion, and detention. Many youth migrants
              always find themselves in the so-called 3-D jobs (dirty, dangerous, and degrading) despite these youths being educated
              and having the required skills (United Nations, 2014). Youth migrants are more vulnerable to migration experiences that
              result in isolation, exclusion, and insecurity. They are in most cases affected by xenophobia, discrimination and suffer
              marginalization due to lack of fluency in the local language, new and different cultural norms, and insufficient information
              about laws and regulations in their new destination areas (United Nations, 2014).
                 Most studies on migration in Uganda have focused on the determinants of RUM and its consequences (Mutandwa,
              Taremwa and Uwimana et al., 2011; Stark and Bloom, 1985) while other studies (Thorat and Jones, 2011; Taylor, 1999;
              Ackah and Medvedev, 2012) have gone ahead to look at the benefits of remittances in socio-economic development of the
              countries of origin. A rich analysis of population migration in Uganda has focused on population redistribution with respect
              to Kigezi and Bugishu (Kabera, 1983), but the study did not isolate internal youth migrations, and a few studies have
              examined the associates of youth internal migration (Deotti and Estruch, 2016; Herrera and Sahn, 2013). Investigations
              about internal migration flow especially among the youth have been limited because of reliable data challenges and the
              fact that it has a less political connotation. Examination of internal mobility patterns including associates and employment
              outcomes is, however, essential as it provides information to policymakers in a bid to benefit from youth migration flows,
              as well as managing mobility costs and risks.
                 The main purpose of this study is to examine the associates of youth internal migration and how migration affected
              youth employment status in Uganda.

              1.2. Theoretical Framework
              The theoretical framework explaining individual-level factors of youth migration was based on propositions made by the
              pull and push theory of migration. According to the theory, globalization has changed the way people see the world. As
              people become more aware of living standards and lifestyles in other parts of the world, for example, through television or
              the stories (and sometimes wealth) of returning expatriates, their understanding of their “relative” poverty has increased,
              and their expectations have changed. This motivates people to migrate to secure greater income. There is also evidence


              International Journal of Population Studies | 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1                          39
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50