Page 52 - IJPS-6-1
P. 52

Climate vulnerability and household nutrition in India


           Table 1. The rationality of selection of the indicator and its relationship with vulnerability.
           Sl. No.  Indicators and dimension ()  Relationship with vulnerability     Data sources    Weight
                   Biophysical
           1       Percentage  of  the  area  under   Forests  provide  safeguard  to  ecological  processes,  provide   Census of India 2011  0.28
                   forest cover 2016-2017 (−)  biophysical stability and alternate livelihood options, and enhance
                                         the adaptive capacity.
           2       Average  Annual  Rainfall  in   Increasing average rainfall increases agricultural production and   India Meteorological   0.18
                   millimeter – 2007-2016 (−)  raises the adaptive capacity          department
           3       Gross  cropped  area  in  hectare   Gross cropped area depicts the available land for cultivation and   Agriculture statistics  0.16
                   2013-2014 (−)         sensitivity to climate vulnerability
           4       Cropping   intensity   in   It represents the frequently available land for cultivation which   Agriculture statistics  0.09
                   % 2013-2014 (−)       has direct sensitivity with food production and vulnerability
           5       The  area  under  irrigation  in   Availability  of  irrigation  facility  has  a  direct  link  with  food   Annual   report   0.09
                   000’ hectare 2013-2014 (−)  production and sensitivity to the climate vulnerability  groundwater
                   Socioeconomic
           6       Population density in 2011 (+)  Pressure on available natural resources increases sensitivity.  Census  0.05
           7       % of SC population in 2011 (+)  Their adaptive capacity toward vulnerability is low  Census  0.01
           8       % of ST population in 2011 (+)  Their adaptive capacity toward vulnerability is still\low  Census  0.01
           9       % of female literacy in 2011 (−)  Educated women household have better adaptive capacity  Census  0.04
           10      % of urban area in 2011 (−)  Rapid urbanization and development quick depletion of natural   Census  0.01
                                         resources increases the sensitivity of vulnerability
           11      Infant   mortality   rate   It  is  synonymous  of  overall  development  indicator.  Higher  the   AHS  0.02
                   2012-2013 (+)         value implies a lack of adaptive capacity.
           12      Per   capita   income   in   A direct indicator representing the inherent sensitivity of people   Economic survey  0.00
                   rupees (NDDP) 2013-2014 (−)  in a region
           13      Average man-days employment   Provides alternate sources of income and enhances the adaptive   MGNREGS  0.00
                   generated  under  MGNREGA   capacity.
                   2013-14 (-)
           “()” Sign under parenthesis is the dimension of the indicator

           socioeconomic indicators (eight indicators as listed in Table 1), and CVCV acronym as Composite Value of Climate
           Vulnerability.  District  wise  detailed  value  of  these  indicators  are  provided  in Table A1. As  mentioned  above,  three
           independent models have been run separately using Statistical Package for the Social Science version-21 to examine the
           association of climate vulnerability with household nutrition status.
           3. Results

           The results of this study are presented in two parts. The extent and variation of climate vulnerability among districts in
           Odisha are interpreted by computing a composite index, ranking the individual index values and then through categorizing
           the ranks associated with the indexes. Association of climate vulnerability with household nutrition is comprehended through
           multivariate analysis in the second stage. The study computes the climate vulnerability index notably, the vulnerability about
           agriculture production using various secondary published data sources, as mentioned in Table 2, considering both biophysical
           as well as socioeconomic factors. While estimating the weighted scores of the climate vulnerability in Odisha, it is found that
           among the districts, Mayurbhanj (0.099) is the least vulnerable district followed by Ganjam (0.103) and Sundergarh (0.105).
           On the other hand, Bhadrak (0.193) is the most vulnerable district followed by Sonepur (0.191) and Baudh (0.190). The study
           also found that around 37% (11 of 30) of districts in Odisha are categorized under a high climate vulnerability segment, 53%
           are in medium bracket followed by 10% in low segment. The details of the results are presented in Table 2.

           3.1. Impact of Climate Vulnerability on Household Nutrition Status

           Before applying the multivariate regression analysis, it is crucial to comprehend the cause and effect relationship of
           climate vulnerability and household nutrition status. It is observed that direct relationships between household nutrition
           status and climate vulnerability in Odisha, although the latter has a significant role through the agriculture production


           46                                              International Journal of Population Studies | 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57