Page 44 - IJPS-8-2
P. 44

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                           Used versus Offered densities of human population




                          A                                     B












            Figure 1. Used and offered PDFs of human density
            (A) Standard scales, (B) abscissas in log-scale
            Source: author’s elaboration

              When  x  follows a log-normal distribution, then so
                     O
            does x  (cf. appendix C), with same variance s  of the law
                                                 2
                 U
            of ln x: Then, the interquartile ratios of x  are identical to
                                             U
            their offered counterparts.
            2.4. Lorenz curve and Gini index
            2.4.1. Recalling the classical theory of inequality
            measurement
            In Gini’s classical analysis of income inequalities (Gini, 1912;
            1955; Gionanni & Gubbiotti, 2015), the sum of all individual
            incomes in a group of people is decomposed according to
            specific subgroups of people. A  typical subgroup gathers
            the people that each earn less than a given level of income.
            Then, to the proportion F  (x) of-people whose income is   Figure 2. Lorenz function and Gini index
                                 P
            <x is associated the proportion F  (x) of total income that   x designates an individual income
                                      I
            stems from the aggregation of their individual incomes. As   Source: Author’s adaptation from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_
            both proportions are increasing functions of x, they depend   coefficient [Last accessed 8.11.2022]
            on each other in a unique way. Their relationship is known   Lorenz curve, divided by the area below the straight line,
            as the “Lorenz function” denoted L and defined as follows   that is, 0.5, is known as the Gini index, with mathematical
            (Cowell, 2009; Lorenz, 1905):                      formula as follows (Cowell, 2009):

                 L()  F I   F P (1 )                          1


              The reason is that each value of x gives rise to population   G  2 (  )L  d          (19)
                                                                      0
            proportion α ≡ F (x), therefore satisfying  x  F P  ( 1 ) () , and
                         I
            to  income  proportion  F (x),  which  is  thus  equivalently   The Gini index takes its value in [0,1]. Between different
                                I
                             1

            expressed as  FF(  P  .                          income distributions, the larger the heterogeneity, the
                               )
                                                               larger the Gini index: It is a metric of inequality (Cowell,
                       I
                           
              The derivative  L  of  L  satisfies that         2009). In appendix C, a log-normal instance is addressed
                      I
                     f x p    1                             to give insight in the consumption model and illustrate
                                                               the properties of relative dispersions and the Gini index.
               
               L           x P                 (18)
                      P
                     f x p    x P                           2.4.2. Adaptation to human density
                                                               Gini’s line of reasoning applies to the distributions of
              It is non-negative and increasing with α since  F P (−1 )  is   human density: To the F  (x) share of space with density <x
                                                                                  O
            increasing:  This  makes  L  an  increasing  and  convex   corresponds the F (x) share of people each experiencing
                                                                              U
            function. Thus, in the diagram of F  versus F  in [0,1]×[0.1],   individual density <x. Here, the Lorenz function is
                                              p
                                       1
            the  graph of function L, called the “Lorenz curve,” lies   LF  U  F O  ( 1 ) . The resulting Gini index constitutes another
            below the straight line from point (0,0) to point (1,1)   metric of density heterogeneity, along with  γ  and  γ .
                                                                                                            U
                                                                                                     O
            (Figure  2). The area between the straight line and the   Figure  3 exhibits  a Lorenz  curve  of  population density,
            Volume 8 Issue 2 (2022)                         38                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i2.297
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49