Page 46 - ITPS-5-2
P. 46

40    INNOSC Theranostics and Pharmacological Sciences, 2022, Vol. 5, No. 2                     Das et al.

            Table 2. (Continued)
            No.   Chitosan       Binding affinity  Types of interaction  Interacting AA name; chain name; AA number
                  derivatives    (kcal/mol)
            7     N-octadecanoyl- −6.4          van der Waals          Pro A:665, Val B:772, Thr B:768, Asn B:764, Tyr
                  N-3-carboxy                                           A:913, Gln A:914, Ala B:766, Gln A:1010, Gln
                  propionyl                                             A:954, Arg A:1014, Gln A:957, Gly B:769, Leu
                  chitosan                                           B:1012, Gln B:762, Ala A:958, Thr B:761, Leu A:908
                                                Conventional hydrogen              Thr A:902, Ile :912
                                                bond
                                                Unfavorable positive-                 Arg B:765
                                                positive
            8       Palmitoyl-        −6.9      van der Waals          Gly A:667, Ile A:666, Gln A:613, Lys B:733, Ile
                     trimethyl-                                       A:312, Val B:772, Thr B:768, Tyr A:313, Leu A:303,
                     chitosan                                         Asn A:953, Ile B:770, Leu B:1012, Gly B:769, Gln
                                                                                   A:954, Gln A:957
                                                Conventional hydrogen        Asp A:950, Arg B:765, Ala B:766
                                                bond
                                                Carbon-hydrogen bond                  Asp A:950
                                                Alternative charge                    Glu B:773
                                                 Unfavorable positive-           Arg A:1014, Arg B:1019
                                                      positive
            Abbreviation: NCMC: N-carboxymethyl chitosan.

            Table 3. Protein-protein interactions of S protein with ACE2 receptor, S protein-mHTCC complex with
            ACE2 receptor, and S protein-NCMC complex with ACE-2 receptor
            Macromolecule                 Binding positions  Lowest energy (kJ/mol)   Average lowest energy (kJ/mol)

            S protein-ACE2                Red                       −928.9                      −901.2
            S protein-ACE2                Green                      −923
            S protein-ACE2                Blue                      −902.4
            S protein-ACE2                Violet                    −853.3
            S protein-ACE2                Light blue                −898.4
            S protein with mHTCC-ACE2     Red                       −785.4                      −765.06
            S protein with mHTCC-ACE2     Green                     −783.7
            S protein with mHTCC-ACE2     Blue                      −750.4
            S protein with mHTCC-ACE2     Violet                    −756.3
            S protein with mHTCC-ACE2     Light Blue                −749.5
            S protein with NCMC-ACE2      Red                       −863.5                      −814.72
            S protein with NCMC-ACE2      Green                     −850.2
            S protein with NCMC-ACE2      Blue                      −741.1
            S protein with NCMC-ACE2      Violet                    −797.3
            S protein with NCMC-ACE2      Light Blue                −821.5
            Abbreviations: NCMC: N-carboxymethyl chitosan; ACE2: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; HTCC: Hydroxypropyl trimethyl
            ammonium chloride chitosan.

           ΔGb is reduced due to the binding of mHTCC to the S   HTCC  reduce  the  affinity  of  the  spike  protein  for
           protein, as depicted in (Figure 4 and Figure S8). This   the host cell ACE2 receptor. As a result, the virus
           finding complies with the study by Milewska et al.   replication and multiplication inside the host tissue
           [17], indicating that both polymeric and monomeric   are significantly reduced.

                                                    ©2022 AccScience Publishing
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51