Page 92 - ITPS-7-1
P. 92

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                               Plants immunoactivity: In silico study



            2.1. Chemical composition of each herbal plant     2.4. Related targets in the immune system and the
                                                               involved pathways
            An exhaustive literature search was conducted for each
            herbal remedy, aiming to capture all available information   Related targets in the immune system were searched
            regarding their constituents. The compound composition   using  the innate immune database . Subsequently,  the
                                                                                            [25]
            of these plants was further extracted from Dr.  Duke’s   STRING database and the pathway database were utilized
            Phytochemical Database (https://phytochem.nal.usda.  to determine the different pathways associated with
            gov/) and the Indian Medicinal Plants, Phytochemistry,   the immune system. The I-PW were then evaluated and
            and Therapeutics (IMPPAT) (https://cb.imsc.res.in/  analyzed.
            imppat/) . Structure files of molecules, provided in mol   Moreover, the STRING database was used to identify
                   [15]
            format, were retrieved from PubChem  and ChEMBL ,   the interacting partners of these bioactive targets searched
                                          [16]
                                                        [17]
            including their canonical SMILES.                  in the KEGG pathway to find IA-IP.
            2.2. Screening of potential active phytocompounds  2.5. Targets of multiple myeloma and control drugs
            The attributes of absorption, distribution, metabolism,   The multiple myeloma-associated human genes/proteins
            and excretion (ADME) were recognized as pivotal    were obtained from two different databases: GeneCards
                                                                                                           [26]
            indicators of herb or potential medication potency.   and DisGeNET . The search query employed the specific
                                                                           [27]
            To unveil the possible bioactive components within   term “multiple myeloma,” with the search parameters
            each of the two herbal plants, three ADME-related   confined to the species “Homo  sapiens.” The targets of
            models were used, including the evaluation of oral   control IMiDs (Lenalidomide and Thalidomide) were also
            bioavailability (OB) and drug-likeness (DL). The   retrieved from GeneCards and Disgenet, subsequently
            technique also includes the identification and inclusion   overlapping with the targets of the identified bioactives.
            of the main components present within the plants [17] .
            OB refers to the percentage of an orally administered   2.6. PPi
            dose of a medication that enters the systemic circulation   The overlap of related gene targets of the bioactives and
            unaltered. High OB is frequently indicative of bioactive   the immune system was regarded as the bioactives’
            compounds possessing drug-like properties suitable for   immune targets at the interactome level. Similarly, the
            medicinal  applications [18] .  DL  is  a  qualitative  concept   overlap of related gene targets of the bioactives’ immune
            employed in drug design to gauge the “drug-likeness”   targets and multiple myeloma was regarded as bioactive-
            of a prospective product. This assessment aids in   multiple myeloma’s immune gene targets at the diseasome
            the optimization of pharmacokinetic and medicinal   level. These interactions were obtained using Venny
            characteristics, including solubility and chemical   2.0 . Subsequently, the STRING database was employed
                                                                 [28]
            stability. Typically, variables such as OB ≤30 – 33% and/  to identify the possible inter-protein interactions .
                                                                                                           [29]
            or DL ≤0.1 are widely adopted criteria [19] .      This database compiles both established and predicted
              The ADMET profiles of all potential substances were   PPi. STRING uses five sources to uncover relationships
            estimated using SwissADME and AdmetSar 2.0. In     within  the database: genomic  context  predictions, high-
            addition, the DL score was estimated based on “Lipinski’s   throughput  lab  trials,  co-expression,  automated  text
            Rule of Five” parameters (molecular weight, Log P,   mining, and existing database information. Several
            hydrogen bond donors, and hydrogen bond acceptors)   variables for STRING-based PPi identification can be
            using the Molinspiration online web server [20,21] .  used to ensure the reliability of the generated data. These
                                                               variables include interactions derived exclusively from
            2.3. Targets of the bioactives                     high-throughput laboratory experiments, a minimum
                                                               required interaction score of 0.7 (a high confidence score
            Target genes/proteins in humans that interact with active   according to STRING), and the highest score of interactors.
            phytochemical substances from two  herbal  plants were
            investigated using the Similarity Ensemble Approach   2.7. Network construction
            (SEA) , SwissTargetPrediction , and PharmMapper .
                                                       [24]
                 [22]
                                     [23]
                                                               A network is a diagrammatic representation that depicts
              Data for each protein, including its standard protein   the interactions between numerous components known as
            name, gene ID and organism (set to Homo sapiens), were   nodes. These nodes are interconnected by edges, which are
            derived from UniProt  (“UniProt: a hub for protein   lines that connect them. In this study, the nodes encompass
                              [25]
            information,” 2014) using the UniProt ID provided in   the herbal plants under investigation, the bioactives
            BindingDB.                                         within these herbal plants, the bioactives’ targets, and the
            Volume 7 Issue 1 (2024)                         3                         https://doi.org/10.36922/itps.1076
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97