Page 18 - ITPS-8-1
P. 18
INNOSC Theranostics and
Pharmacological Sciences Image-assisted personalized interventions
83. Song Y. Human digital twin, the development and impact on Trans Magnet. 2018;54(8):7402209.
design. J Comput Inf Sci Eng. 2023;23:060819.
doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2018.2828786
doi: 10.1115/1.4063132
95. Cicuttin M, Geuzaine C. Numerical investigation of a
84. Burattini S, Montagna S, Croatti A, et al. An Ecosystem 3D hybrid high-order method for the indefinite time-
of Digital Twins for Operating Room Management. In: harmonic Maxwell problem. Finite Elements Anal Des.
Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 36 International Symposium 2024;233:104124.
th
on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), L’Aquila, Italy; doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2024.104124
2023. p. 770-775.
96. Piriou F, Razek A. Numerical simulation of a
doi: 10.1109/CBMS58004.2023.00317
nonconventional alternator connected to a rectifier. IEEE
85. Hagmann K, Hellings-Kuß A, Klodmann J, et al. A digital Trans Energy Convers. 1990;5:512-518.
twin approach for contextual assistance for surgeons during doi: 10.1109/60.105275
surgical robotics training. Front Robot AI. 2021;8:735566.
97. Bernard L. Electrical Characterization of Biological
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.735566
Tissues and Computing of Phenomena Induced in the
86. Katsoulakis E, Wang Q, Wu H, et al. Digital twins for health: Human Body by Electromagnetic Fields Below 1 GHz. PhD
a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2024;7:77. Thesis, Universities of Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France
and Universidade federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil; 2007.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01073-0
Available from: https://theses.hal.science/tel-00179791v3
87. Cusumano D, Boldrini L, Dhont J, et al. Artificial [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 20].
intelligence in magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy:
Medical and physical considerations on state of art and 98. Ren Z, Razek A. Force calculation by Maxwell stress tensor
future perspectives. Phys Med. 2021;85:175-191. in 3D hybrid finite element-boundary integral formulation.
IEEE Trans Magnet. 1990;26(5):2774-2776.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.010
doi: 10.1109/20.104869
88. Seetohul J, Shafiee M, Sirlantzis K. Augmented reality (AR)
for surgical robotic and autonomous systems: State of the 99. Freschi F, Giaccone L, Cirimele V, Canova A. Numerical
art, challenges, and solutions. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23:6202. assessment of low-frequency dosimetry from sampled
magnetic fields. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(1):015029.
doi: 10.3390/s23136202
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9915
89. Avrumova F, Lebl DR. Augmented reality for minimally
invasive spinal surgery. Front Surg. 2023;9:1086988. 100. Li C, Ren Z, Razek A. An approach to adaptive mesh
refinement for three-dimensional eddy-current
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1086988 computations. IEEE Trans Magn. 1994;30:113-17.
90. Long Y, Cao J, Deguet A, Taylor RH, Dou Q. Integrating doi: 10.1109/20.272523
Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality in Robotic
Surgery: An Initial dVRK Study Using a Surgical Education 101. Piriou F, Razek A. Calculation of saturated inductances for
Scenario. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on numerical simulation of synchronous machines. IEEE Trans
Medical Robotics (ISMR), Atlanta, GA, USA; 2022. p. 1-8. Magn. 1983;19(6):2628-2631.
doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1983
91. Fu J, Rota A, Li S, et al. Recent advancements in augmented
reality for robotic applications: A survey. Actuators. 102. Madani SS, Schaltz E, Kær SK. Thermal analysis of cold plate
2023;12:323. with different configurations for thermal management of a
lithium-ion battery. Batteries. 2020;6:17.
doi: 10.3390/act12080323
doi: 10.3390/batteries6010017
92. Qian L, Wu JY, DiMaio SP, et al. A review of augmented
reality in robotic-assisted surgery. IEEE Trans Med Robot 103. Urdaneta-Calzadilla A, Galopin N, Niyonzima I, et al.
Bionics. 2020;2:1-16. FEM-BEM modeling of nonlinear magnetoelectric effects
in heterogeneous composite structures. IEEE Trans Magn.
doi: 10.1109/TMRB.2019.2957061
2024;60(3):7401704.
93. Razek A. Matching of an observed event and its virtual
model in relation to smart theories, coupled models and doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2023.3339088
supervision of complex procedures-A review. Comptes 104. Razek A. Coupled models in electromagnetic and energy
Rendus Phys. 2024;25:1-16. conversion systems from smart theories paradigm to that of
complex events: A review. Appl Sci. 2022;12:4675.
doi: 10.5802/crphys.184
doi: 10.3390/app12094675
94. Nunes AS, Dular P, Chadebec O, Kuo-Peng P. Subproblems
applied to a 3-D magnetostatic facet FEM formulation. IEEE 105. Razek A. Strategies for managing models regarding
Volume 8 Issue 1 (2025) 12 doi: 10.36922/itps.4567

