Page 92 - ITPS-8-3
P. 92

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                                   Effects of robots on QoL in SCI



              Spinal cord abnormalities cover a range of conditions   conducting assessments at multiple follow-up times, this
            that influence the structure or function of the spinal cord.    research seeks to show overall insights into the long-term
                                                         6-8
            Common types of spinal cord abnormalities include spina   advantages of robotic-assisted surgery. In addition, the
            bifida, tethered cord syndrome, and spinal cord tumors.   study explores the role of nursing care and telehealth in
            These  abnormalities  can  cause  different  symptoms,  such   assisting  and  facilitating  continuous  follow-up,  further
            as pain, weakness, sensory loss, and deteriorated mobility,   improving the patient experience and outcomes. Finally,
            significantly affecting the patient’s quality of life (QoL). 9  through this investigation, the study aims to contribute
              The prevalence of spinal cord abnormalities differs   beneficial knowledge to the field of orthopedic surgery
            according to the specific condition.  For example, spina   and consolidate evidence-based practices that prioritize
                                         10
            bifida occurs in about 1 in 1000 live births, while spinal   patient-centered care.
            cord injuries, which often occur after trauma, affect   2. Materials and methods
            approximately 54 individuals per million annually.
            Increased awareness, advances in medical technology, and   2.1. Participants and data collection
            research innovations have improved early detection and   The patient’s data were collected from two hospitals between
            management, which affect both incidence and outcomes. 11  December 2023 and November 2024. Only experienced
              The Tianji orthopedic robot showed significant   physicians and nurses were allowed to collect and record
            advancement, offering higher accuracy in screw placement   the data. This study included patients with spinal cord
            and decreased intraoperative complications.  This robotic   abnormalities, whether the patient underwent surgery
                                               12
            technology improves surgical efficiency and seeks to   with or without an assisted robot, with at least 12 months
            elevate the overall patient experience and prognosis. 12,13  As   of follow-up time. The demographic data, imaging studies,
            patient satisfaction and QoL are paramount considerations   fracture characteristics, and operation data were collected
            in health care, understanding the effect of such developed   and analyzed.
            technologies is definitive.                          Before the questionnaire, patients received a brief
              The most significant contribution of robotics to   explanation of  the  research study  and  the  purpose of
            orthopedics is its ability to increase surgical accuracy.   using the collected data. Patients were required to answer
            The traditional surgical techniques mainly depend on the   all questions before submitting the survey at the pre-
            surgeon’s skills, which increases the chance of inattentive   operation stage. A  self-administered questionnaire was
            errors. Moreover, robotic systems combined with advanced   distributed using the Baidu forms  platform and shared
            imaging and real-time feedback techniques allow surgeons   via Chinese social media platforms (WeChat and QQ)
            to plan and perform surgery with high accuracy. 14  for patient follow-up. However, patients who received the
              The high accuracy level needed minimizes disruption of   online questionnaire were required to confirm their desire
            soft tissue, resulting in reduced post-surgery complications   to participate in the survey. Participation in this study was
            and  recovery  periods.  Developing  a  multidisciplinary   voluntary, no compensation was provided, no identifying
            strategy requires structured communication and     details were collected, and data collection was anonymous.
            cooperation,  where  each  healthcare  providers  share   Demographic and injury data were collected from patient
            their insights into improving patient safety and surgical   records  and imaging  studies,  following  the  principles
            sufficiency. 15-17  Specifically, nurses play a fundamental role   outlined in the Helsinki Declaration. This study was
            in perioperative care, providing essential assessments,   approved by the ethics committee of The Second Affiliated
            monitoring, and support associated with the surgical   Hospital of Hainan Medical University.
            procedure. 18,19                                   2.2. Inclusion/exclusion criteria
              Patient satisfaction covers various aspects, including   The inpatients who were ≥18  years old, capable of
            pain management, functional recovery, and the overall   understanding the study, and agreed to participate were
            experience of care, while QoL includes a patient’s physical,   included. Patients who were unable to complete the
            emotional, and social well-being. 20,21  It is essential to   questionnaire, with cognitive impairments, or did not
            highlight the importance of these factors in assessing how   provide consent, either personally or through a family
            robotic-assisted IF surgery influences the patients over time.  member, were excluded.

              This  longitudinal  follow-up  study  aims to investigate
            the effects of IF surgery using the Tianji orthopedic   2.3. Sample size
            robot on patient satisfaction and QoL. By involving   The Raosoft calculator (Raosoft Inc., United States) was
            validated patient-reported outcome measures and    utilized to set the sample size for our study, based on the


            Volume 8 Issue 3 (2025)                         86                          doi: 10.36922/ITPS025080009
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97