Page 45 - JCAU-4-1
P. 45

Two Water Towns in the Qingpu District of Shanghai                                                                            Semprebon


               entails a crucial question against the backdrop   Silverman have detected an intensification of
               of current policies and practices, especially in   the “heritage fever” as a polysemic instrument
               contemporary times when cultural industries    to serve economic and political projects  [11] .
               play relevant geopolitical roles  [3-5] .      The  “Belt  and  Road  Initiative”  embodies
                                                              physically and spiritually the vision for also a
               2.  LITERATURE       REVIEW:                   “cultural diplomacy”  [12]  where cross-national
                    TOURISM  DEVELOPMENT                      exchanges    strengthen   the   geopolitical
                    IN  CHINESE  HISTORICAL                   position  of  Beijing  in  the  global  arena.
                    SETTLEMENTS                               Beyond  building  a  legitimizing  political
               The literature review addresses three aspects:   narrative,  at  the  same  time,  the  heritage-
               heritage management, tourism development,      making     process    has    served    local
               and the interferences between the two.         administration to implement cultural-oriented
                                                                                                     [6]
                                                              development  strategies  instrumentally  .  A
               2.1  Heritage  sites  in  China  as  a  tool  of   similar interpretative key was put forward by
                    contemporary narrative                    other  studies,  which  have  drawn  on  how
               The  Cultural  Revolution  (1966‒1976)         Chinese heritage policies have been shaped to
               marked a problematic era in Chinese heritage-  “serve the interest of the present”. Through
               led policies, with historic relicts appointed as   the  process  of  “value  appropriation,”
               feudal  and  backward  legacies  not  fitting  in   development  agencies  have  financially
               with  the  political  ideology   [6] .  Denise  Ho   valorised   common   cultural   practices,
               observed that the display of historical objects   inducing  residents  and  institutions  to
               was “meant to spark political awakening, to    “selectively  and  strategically  appropriate
               create a revolutionary narrative that included   values  developed  at  another,  often  higher
               the  viewers  and  to  motivate  them  to      scale”  [12,13] .
                                            [7]
               participate in the realization”  , identifying a    From this angle, the instrumental role of
               moral  engagement  in  the  leadership’s       heritage as a “service of the newly envisaged
               priorities.  With  the  leadership  of  Deng   futures”  [14]  led some scholars to identify an
               Xiaoping,  a  new  political  cycle  started,   unbridgeable distance between acknowledged
               promoting alternative paths to the realization   cultural patrimony and history, intended as a
               of the Communist State, grafting capitalistic   true  sequence  of  facts.  For  many  authors,
               mechanisms into a state-driven economy. In     these gaps materialize a complex negotiation
               concert, a more laical approach to the objects   of  conflicts   [15]   between  cultural  positions,
               and  symbols  inherited  from  the  past  was   political ideologies, economic interests, and
               embodied  and  coupled  with  the  attempt  to   local identities.
               limit  Western  culture’s  influences,  which       In  the  Chinese  domain,  the  questions
               were  increasingly  popular  in  China  at  that   posed  by  the  development  of  heritage  sites
               time.  The  recognition  and  valorisation  of   have  attracted  lively  debates  on  policies’
               Chinese traditional culture became part of a   formulation  and  practices’  implementation.
               broader process of national identity-building   Zan stigmatised the dilemma between cultural
                             [8]
               and  branding  .  In  addition  to  maintaining   protection  and  economic  development,
               social  cohesion   [9] ,  the  heritage  discourse   explicating  that  “the  principal  problem  for
               contributed to paving the road for a profound   China’s tangible cultural heritage is economic
               process  of  rediscovery  of  pre-revolutionary   development,   whose   effects   can   be
               roots, ancient traditions, and local folklore  [10] .  devastating   on   the   valued   physical
               As a process that is still ongoing, it is placing   environment and problematical for the in situ
               the country in a dimension of continuity with   social one”  [16] .
               its past, forging a distinctive national identity   Since 2000, a cooperative project aimed
               and  opening  new  economic  possibilities  in   at  devising  a  set  of  principles  to  manage
               underdeveloped  sites,  sometimes  conceived   Chinese  heritage,  was  internationally  co-
               as  exotic  experiences.  Blumenfield  and     participated  by  the  Getty  Conservation



                AccScience Publishing                                                                  3
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50