Page 46 - JCAU-4-1
P. 46

Two Water Towns in the Qingpu District of Shanghai                                                                            Semprebon


               Institute, the Australian Heritage Commission,  observers.  The  tourism  industry  was
               ICOMOS International, ICOMOS China, and        introduced as a developmental factor by Xu in
               the State Administration for Cultural Heritage.  1999, portraying its theoretical and empirical
               The     experience    blossomed     in   the   backgrounds,  the  growth  and  structure  of
               Conservation and Management Principles of      tourism    demand,      its   infrastructural
               Cultural    Heritage    Sites   in    China,   development,  and  its  economic  effects   [20] .
               subsequently labelled “The China Principles”   More recently, Mimi and Wu have provided a
               [17] .  These  documents  have  embodied       more updated picture of the tourism industry
               remarkable     advancement     in   heritage   condition, remarking that case study analysis
               stewardship,  fixing  canons  to  address      still  represents  the  main  object  of  scholarly
               concepts     like    historical   condition,   investigation.
               authenticity, integrity, minimal interventions,     The    concept   of   commodification
               cultural    traditions,   and    appropriate   epitomises the most visible link between the
               technology  [18] .                             tourism industry and local development. With
                                                              the term “commodification,” it is referred to,
               2.2  The   tourism   industry   as   a         using Goulding’s words, as “the process by
                    developmental tool                        which  things  (and  activities)  come  to  be
               Chinese cultural resources have experienced    evaluated primarily in terms of their exchange
               alternating fortunes since the proclamation of   value in a context of trade”  [24] . This process
               the People Republic of China in 1949. Su and   has been addressed in plural ways by scholars:
               Teo  [19]  provided a sharp picture of tourism’s   as  a  sociocultural  opportunity   [25] ,  as  a
               condition  under  the  leadership  of  Mao     denigrating agent  [26] , or as a mix of the two
               Zedong,  which  was  a  “collective  provision   with  commodification  as  an  agent  injecting
               (…)  that  served  mainly  the  domestic  elite:   new meanings into local cultures  [28] .
               namely  Chinese  compatriots  or  foreign           Since the late 1970s, the tourism boom in
               delegations from socialist countries” and was   China has been seen by policy-makers also as
               mainly a “top-down political task” deprived    a “spiritual modernization” and “as a two-way
               of market outlets  [20] .                      civilizing tool, capable of producing positive
                    After  the  difficult  days  of  the  Cultural   change in tourists as well as ‘tourees’”  [29,30] .
               Revolution  (1966‒1976),  when  tourism        Visitors’  agendas  have  influenced  the
               stagnated,  the  travel  industry  gained      selection criteria of sites appetible for tourists
               recognition as one of the market’s engines  [21,   [19] ,  making  sightseers’  habits  decisive  in
               22] , shifting from epitomising a political status,  shaping  tourism  politics  and  related  spatial
               during  Mao’s  era,  to  an  “integral  part  of   settings  [31] . In more recent years, the tourism
               Chinese  lifestyle”   [19] .  At  the  dawn  of  the   industry  has  constantly  diversified  and
               1990s, Oakes commented on how China was        increased  its  impact  on  policy  formulation
               absorbing and reproducing modernity in his     and heritage management, assuming several
               book addressed as “false”, his word remarked   roles in local developments, such as targeting
               the  tight  ties  running  between  tourism  and   poverty  alleviation,  building  a  historical
               economy: “tourism remains one of the most      narration,  innovating  the  leisure  sector,  or
               powerful  forces  through  which  the  Chinese   invigorating economic growth  [32,33] .
               state, and Chinese capital, seek to dominant
               popular  narratives  of  ‘modern  China’”   [23] .   2.3  Heritage tourism: A contested domain
               The  rising  leisure  industry  never  divorced   Reciprocal  influences  between  the  tourism
               from the task of fuelling a magnificent image   industry  and  Chinese  historical  sites  have
               of  the  country  and,  at  the  same  time,   been  widely  examined,  mostly  in  terms  of
               vigorously joined the opportunities offered by   causal effects and socioeconomic outputs  [34-
               an    expanding    market.   This   strategy   39] .  Most  researchers  have  agreed  that
               contributed to building a selective narrative of   heritage-led  tourist  development  triggered
               the past in front of both foreign and domestic   lively  debates  among  local  players,  where



                AccScience Publishing                                                                  4
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51