Page 63 - JCAU-5-2
P. 63

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                Cooling energy-saving mechanism




                         A                                   B















                    Figure 6. (A and B) Comparison of hourly load reduction based on outdoor dry bulb temperature. Source: Graph by the authors

            that: (i) Due to the same climatic conditions, although the   figure that the load reduction amount for 1 h within the
            thermal performance of envelope vary greatly, the hourly   range of 26°C – 27°C may be equal to 10 or even dozens
            load reduction has similarity with the variation of outdoor   of times of the hourly load reduction amount outside the
            dry bulb temperature. (ii) When the outdoor dry bulb   range.  Therefore,  the  key  to the  annual absolute  energy
            temperature is lower than 26°C, there is no cooling demand,   saving effect is behavioral energy savings. (v) In the lower-
            and Guangzhou has the cooling demand for 3,341 h in the   grade envelope, the maximum hourly load reduction in the
            whole year, which has nothing to do with the envelope   range of 26°C – 27°C is 110.18 kW, and only 79.07 kW in
            performance. The outdoor dry bulb temperature is between   the top-grade envelope. This is because the improvement
            26°C and 27°C for 831 h, and the absolute energy saving at   of the thermal performance of the envelope structure
            these moments account for a large proportion of the total   reduces the hourly cooling load demand of the building
            absolute energy saving in the whole year. For the lower-  at 26°C. According to the above, the hourly load reduction
            grade envelope, the total absolute energy saving at all times   of outdoor temperature between 26°C and 27°C is the
            when the outdoor temperature is between 26°C and 27°C is   hourly cooling load at the set-point of 26℃, which makes
            9763.01 kwh, accounting for 58.30% of the annual energy   a great contribution to annual absolute energy savings.
            saving. For the top-grade envelope, the total absolute   Therefore, the annual absolute energy saving scale with
            energy saving at these times is 7257.67 kWh, accounting   setpoint rise of 1°C shows a variation rule that decreases
            for 79.35% of the annual energy savings. Therefore, in   with the improvement of envelope performance. (6) For
            the  time  of  annual  cooling  demand,  the  micro  absolute   the time when the dry bulb temperature is >27°C, there is
            energy saving of outdoor temperature between 26°C and   a minimum value of hourly load reduction, and the hourly
            27°C always constitutes the main contribution of the total   load reduction values of all these moments are very close to
            absolute energy savings after increasing the temperature by   this minimum value. The minimum hourly load reduction
            1°C. (iii) Although from the perspective of macro energy   under lower-grade envelope is 2.77 kw, and it is only 0.74
            consumption, the higher the performance of the envelope,   kw under top-grade envelope. This is due to the decrease in
            the lower the absolute annual energy saving of the   K-value caused by the improvement in the performance of
            building. However, from the microscopic analysis results,   the envelope. According to the basic heat transfer formula
            buildings with better envelope performance have a larger   of Q = KFΔT, the energy savings from heat transfer by
            percentage of behavioral energy savings in absolute annual   temperature difference decreases. However, due to the
            energy savings, so their contribution is greater. Therefore,   large number of moments of heat transfer by temperature
            behavioral energy saving measures cannot be ignored for   difference, the energy-saving effect brought by these still
            new  buildings.  (iv)  For  the  moments  when  the outdoor   needs to be paid attention to.
            temperature is between 26°C and 27°C, energy savings   Figure 7 shows the comparison of hourly load reduction
            is  resulted  because  the  indoor  temperature  set-point  is   of low-grade and top-grade envelope with hourly cooling
            artificially raised from 26°C to 27°C, and indoor cooling is   load change before set-point rise. It can be seen from the
            no longer needed, which saves all the cooling loads when   diagram that: (i) Although the cooling load demand ranges
            the setpoint is 26°C. The hourly load reduction caused by   of the two grades of envelope are different, the distribution
            set-point adjustment is much larger than the energy savings   rules of hourly load reduction have great similarity. (ii) With
            obtained by heat transfer due to temperature differences   the increase of cooling load before set-point rise, the hourly
            at other cooling moments. It can also be seen from the   load reduction presents two distribution rules. One is the


            Volume 5 Issue 2 (2023)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0877
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68