Page 64 - JCAU-5-2
P. 64

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                Cooling energy-saving mechanism



            gentle distribution near a minimum value; the other is the   The worse the thermal performance of the envelope, the
            linear increase with the increase of cooling load. (iii) The   greater the energy savings potential of the act, and thus
            load reduction with linear increase is the time when the   the better the energy savings of the act of increasing the
            outdoor temperature is between 26°C and 27°C. As the load   temperature setting value, and finally the greater the
            reduction amount at these moments is equal to the hourly   absolute energy savings throughout the year. In addition,
            cooling load at 26°C, the figure shows a linear growth rule.   an outdoor temperature of between 26°C and 27°C is
            The better the thermal performance of the envelope, the   common in the transitional season of the year. From this
            smaller the growth range of load reduction amount and   point, it can be explained that the above monthly energy
            the smaller the maximum value. (iv) The gently distributed   savings obtained the maximum distribution characteristics
            load reduction occurs when the outdoor temperature is   in the transitional season.
            >27°C. The load reduction at these moments is generated
            by temperature difference heat transfer. The  better the   4.2. Micro mechanism of relative energy-saving rate
            thermal performance of the envelope, the smaller the range   The cooling load caused by solar radiation is an important
            of cooling load requirements before set-point rise, and the   part of the total cooling load. Figure 8A and 8B show the
            smaller the constant value of load reduction distribution,   comparison of annual hourly cooling load reduction rate
            and the more concentrated the distribution.        with horizontal solar radiation under the envelope of
                                                               lower-grade and top-grade when temperature set-point
              From the above analysis of the load reduction at the   increases by 1°C. It can be seen from the  diagram that:
            micro level, the variation rule of the annual macro absolute   For envelope with different thermal performance, as the
            energy savings mainly depends on the energy-saving effect   horizontal solar  radiation increases, the  hourly cooling
            obtained by the set-point adjustment behavior at the time   load reduction rate has the same variation range and
            when the outdoor temperature is between 26°C and 27°C.
                                                               similar variation trend, which is the reason of the same
                                                               climatic condition. The hourly load reduction rate is 100%
                                                               for 831 h, when the outdoor temperature is in the range of
                                                               26°C – 27°C mentioned above. For other moments, hourly
                                                               load reduction rate is mainly distributed in the range of
                                                               <20%, the distribution points of top-grade envelope are
                                                               more intensive, and the hourly load reduction rate point
                                                               is lower than that of the lower-grade envelope under the
                                                               same level of solar radiation intensity. Therefore, the annual
                                                               weighted energy-saving rate of top-grade envelope is lower
                                                               (9.73%) than that of lower-grade envelope (12.44%).
                                                                 Figure 9 shows the comparison of hourly load reduction
                                                               rate with the change of air-conditioning load before set-
                                                               point rise under envelope of four grades and analyzes the
                                                               energy-saving mechanism from another perspective. It can
            Figure 7. Comparison of hourly load reduction with hourly cooling load.   be seen from the diagram that: (i) The trend of hourly load
            Source: Graph by the authors                       reduction rate with the cooling load before set-point rise of

                         A                                   B
















                    Figure 8. (A and B) Comparison of hourly load reduction rate based on horizontal solar radiation. Source: Graph by the authors


            Volume 5 Issue 2 (2023)                         10                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0877
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69