Page 97 - JCAU-6-2
P. 97

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                             Residential urban heritage space study




            Table 1. (Continued)
            Space subsystem  Spatial topological relationship index     Spatial material structure index
                              Int.VR 1000   Int.VR 5000   ADE      SME       FME       HE       RE      PDE
            YZ9               117.7827      3160.3264    0.0359    6.7167   2.3423    0.7737   0.9681   6.6892
            YZ10               87.8204      2817.8822    0.0401    6.5057   0.4857    0.5946   0.7219   6.1996
            YZ11               96.1079      2814.3358    0.0502    5.7796   0.9837    0.8061   0.8454   5.8043
            YZ12              120.3480      3248.3679    0.0510    5.6561   2.7648    0.9951   0.8302   5.3034
            YZ13               83.9771      2852.0998    0.0471    5.6668   1.6673    0.6124   0.9921   5.4651
            YZ14               91.9263      3022.6343    0.0440    4.1699   0.9475    0.9911   1.4399   3.9477
            YZ15               57.6069      2758.8220    0.0545    4.5744   0.0000    1.1853   1.3433   4.4104
            Note: In the table, a value of “0.000” indicates that the feature attributes for the specified region are identical.
            Abbreviations: ADE: Architectural density entropy; FME: Function mixing entropy; HE: Heritage space entropy; Int.VR 1000 : Life Integration;
            Int.VR  : Global Integration; PDE: Population density entropy; RE: Residential entropy; SME: Spatial morphology entropy.
                 5000

            the difference in the impact of Life Integration and Global   crucial to accurately categorize spaces to understand their
            Integration on material structure is relatively small, mainly   composition and value. To achieve this goal, this study
            affecting the northeast-southwest axis of “Uji Bridge Road-  proposes a classification model based on spatial clustering
            Byodo-in Front Approach,” indicating a “unidirectional   methods, combined with dendrogram and cubic clustering
            permeation” from the exterior to the interior with minimal   criterion analysis. This approach enables  the division of
            internal impact and permeation.                    the residential urban heritage spaces of Suzhou’s Pingjiang
              Regarding the influence of individual building structures   Historic District and Uji City’s Nakauji District into seven
            on material distribution, the traditional courtyards in   different categories. Through this classification model, the
            the Pingjiang Historic District remain enclosed and are   historical value of different areas can be clearly identified,
            less likely to be developed into commercial spaces along   thereby providing more accurate theoretical support for
            the  street.  Their  larger  scale  also  implies  that  changes   the in-depth protection and value excavation of residential
            predominantly occur in a block-distributed manner within   urban heritage spaces.
            the site. In addition, the winding alleys between courtyards   During the analysis, spatial topology indicators such
            create a “resistance effect” to external resources, thereby   as Life Integration and Global Integration are combined
            stabilizing spatial entropy and preserving the authenticity   with spatial material structure indicators, including ADE,
            and integrity of residential spaces. In the Nakauji District,   SME, FME, HE, RE, and PDE. The aim is to perform
            the traditional Japanese “Machiya” buildings, with their   spatial clustering on the sub-spaces within the study area,
            front-shop-back-residence model, limit the availability of   emphasizing architectural cluster zones and focusing on
            functional spaces for  external  capital.  Material  changes   both the material flow structure and material distribution
            mainly occur along the main roads, thus maintaining the   structure of heritage spaces. The clustering results are
            overall integrity and stability of population entropy and   depicted in Figure 5A and B.
            residential space entropy within the living spaces. However,
            larger  “Machiya”  are often subdivided to  accommodate   Based on the cluster distance tree of spatial subsystems
            more businesses and achieve higher architectural   within the research area and the application of the cubic
            returns, resulting in a more uniform distribution of high-  clustering criterion, combined with on-site survey data and
            density, low-area building clusters along the main roads,   expert assessments, three modern commercial areas (PJ14,
            consequently reducing the ADE.                     PJ17, and PJ22) located in the Pingjiang Historic District
                                                               were excluded from further consideration. Subsequently,
            5. Identification, demarcation, and                the heritage spaces were divided into seven categories to
            potential assessment model for residential         facilitate the potential assessment of residential heritage
            urban heritage spaces                              spaces. These categories take into consideration various
                                                               aspects, such as current regional status, development
            5.1. Identification and assessment of residential   status, and heritage potential. They encompass the Core
            urban heritage spaces                              Historical Heritage Preservation Area, Core Historical
            When studying the identification and potential     Heritage Development and Commercial Integration
            determination of residential urban heritage spaces, it is   Zone, Residential Historical Heritage Potential Zone,


            Volume 6 Issue 2 (2024)                         11                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1732
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102