Page 63 - JCAU-6-4
P. 63

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                           Cultural heritage in monastic settlements




            Table 1. Type‑level indices of landscape patterns for Baiyu Temple
            No.           Index        Quantitative      Size indicator       Shape indicator   Convergence and
                                        indicators                                             divergence indicator
                   Patch type          NP (pieces)  CA   PD (pieces/   PLAND   AREAMN  AWMPFD  AI (%)  IJI (%)
                                                   (ha)    100 ha)   (%)
            1      Arable landscape        78      29.75    2.12     0.81     0.38     2.83     86.32 a  54.45
            2      Woodland landscape      42     1270.79   1.15     34.59   30.26     9.52     98.22 b  70.15
            3      Grassland landscape    102      42.53    2.781    1.16     0.42     2.90     88.09 c  62.59
            4      Watershed landscape     65      25.76    1.77     0.70     0.40     3.50     89.26 d  72.55
            5      Religious landscape     21      15.33    0.57     0.42     0.73     3.96     93.46 e  55.59
            6      Construction site landscape  139  76.51  3.78     2.08     0.55     6.56     90.01 f  71.59
            7      Landscape of transport sites  456  44.77  12.41   1.22     0.10     23.60    53.12 g  62.49
            8      Other land landscapes   17      7.42     0.46     0.20     0.44     2.12     91.04 h  72.56
            Notes:  Arable landscape;  Woodland landscape;  Grassland landscape; dWatershed landscape;  Religious landscape;  Construction site landscape;
                                                                        e
                 a
                                           c
                             b
                                                                                      f
            gLandscape of transport sites; hOther land landscapes.
            Abbreviations: NP: Number of patches; PLAND, %: Percent of landscape; AWMPFD: Area-weighted mean patch fractal dimension; IJI: Interspersion
            and juxtaposition index.


























                                          Figure 2. Distribution of landscaped sites of Baiyu Temple
                                                  Source: Drawing by the authors.

            8,964.48 ha, with 745 patches identified (Figure  3).   high aggregation of natural landscape patches, along with
            The forest landscape occupies 27.49% of the total area,   a religious landscape aggregation of 96.34%, highlights
            grasslands accounts for 10.47%, and arable land accounts   that the surrounding natural resources are abundant and
            for 2.92%. These three landscape types reflect the primary   that the religious landscape is highly concentrated. People’s
            features of a temple-town type of monastery like Dzongsar   livelihoods and daily activities revolve around these two
            Temple.                                            key elements. Compared with Baiyu Temple, the amount
                                                               of arable land is higher, which is a key distinguishing
              Given the importance of rich natural resources in a   factor between monastic settlements in cities versus towns.
            township setting, arable land is extremely important for   In terms of the IJI,  the religious  and  arable  landscapes
            supporting productive functions. Regarding the AI, the   are loosely connected to each other, which are smaller
            order is: AI  > AI > AI  > AI > AI  > AI  > AI  > AI . The   landscape patches and maintain a degree of independence.
                                                 d
                                                      g
                              h
                          c
                     b
                                            f
                                        a
                                   e
            Volume 6 Issue 4 (2024)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.2503
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68