Page 47 - JCBP-2-4
P. 47

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                            A hackathon of cooperative play over 1000 km



            (vii)   Onsite conversation:  Conversation among  peers,   somewhat limited, observed in four types (whiteboard
                 including conversations with parents and siblings   drawing, cat’s cradle, bring me something). Below are the
                 present.                                      play ideas presented in chronological order:
            (viii)   Onsite participation: Play various games among
                 peers, including parents and siblings present.  3.1.1. Plate spinner (10-year-old boy)
            (ix)   Solitary play: Examples of this behavior include   This play involved rotating a plate on a stick. Originally, a
                playing unrelated digital games without looking at the   ceramic plate was used, but a child-friendly plastic plate
                terminal’s video camera.                       was later utilized, which was shown spinning on the stick.
            2.5. Statistical analysis of age dependency        3.1.2. Rope-jumping (5-year-old girl)
            The time-totals of eight different behaviors were analyzed   A 5-year-old girl played a single jump with a jump rope in
            by linear regression and Pearson product-moment    the room.
            correlation coefficients and intercepts. The probabilities
            <0.05 were considered significant.                 3.1.3. Lifting (7-year-old boy)

            3. Results                                         The boy demonstrated a soccer lifting technique indoors
                                                               using a small soft ball.
            3.1. Play ideas presented by children
                                                               3.1.4. My introduction video (three 1-year-old boys
            The event was conducted with five females and two   and one 9-year-old girl)
            males in the lower grades, three females and five males
            in the upper grades, and ten adult parents and staff.   Children from various age groups watched the videos
            Regarding the age composition of the children, females   together.
            were significantly younger than males in the upper grades   3.1.5. Look this way! (9-year-old girl)
            (Table 1; P = 0.0240*), but there was no significant age bias
            between the sexes in the overall composition of the lower   The player faces the viewer in front of the screen and
            and upper grades (Table 1; [All, P = 0.1072]).     points either up, down, left, or right with their arms and

              For the age composition condition of the participant   fingers while saying, “Look this way.” If the viewer faces
            groups,  P-values were calculated by a student  t-test for   the same direction as the player, the player wins, and the
            each mean and standard deviation (Excel, Microsoft) for   viewer loses. The activity was canceled earlier because the
            females and males in the lower and upper age groups. 43  player was inexperienced in operating the remote meeting
                                                               camera to display her actions properly.
              Figure 1 visualizes a representative image of each play
            of all the twelve ideas suggested by children with the   3.1.6. Whiteboard drawing (7-year-old girl)
            number of all children who participated and the number   Drawing pictures on a white piece of paper with the
            of participants who played the same one as the presenter   left hand was asked to guess what it was. The flowchart
            introduced divided into female (red)/male (blue) and   (Figure  2)  summarizes  the  process  of  the  online
            lower-/upper-grade groups in the bar graphs.       sharing feature of the teleconferencing system that was
              As an overall summary, the upper-grade group was   uniquely developed. Child 1 drew a picture on a white
            characterized by frequent viewing of all the play by both   piece of paper and showed it over the screen, but it was
            females (Figure 1; red) and males (Figure 1; blue), whereas   unclear. So, Child 2 suggested drawing a picture on the
            the lower-grade group showed only male participation   whiteboard of the online meeting application. Both the
            in  the  earlier  play  activities  presented.  The  involvement   child  and  parent  of  the  playgivers  did  not  know  how
            of multigenerational children in collaborative play was   to use the whiteboard. Several children and parents
            Table 1. The age conditions of the child participants  explored how to teach them, taking into account their
                                                               understanding.
            Age (year)  Lower age    Upper age      All
                       Mean   SD   Mean    SD   Mean   SD      3.1.7. Origami: Folding paper to make things (6-year-
            Female      6.2   1.3    9.0   0.0   7.3    1.8    old girl)
            Male        5.5   2.1   11.4   1.5   9.7    3.3    She seemed to be folding origami all the time, not facing
            P by t-test  0.7241       0.0240*      0.1072      the screen. She only showed it when she was finished, while
            Abbreviation: SD: Standard deviation. The significant p value is less   the parent explained instead of her. A girl in the lower age
            then 0,05 (*: p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001).     group participated in the game by folding origami.



            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         4                               doi: 10.36922/jcbp.4221
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52