Page 26 - JCTR-10-6
P. 26

336                       Cordeiro et al.ǀ Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(6): 334-342
        the  procedure.  Sealed,  opaque, and sequentially  numbered   The FIM aims to assess what a person can actually achieve,
        envelopes were used to conceal the allocation sequence until   regardless of diagnosis, generating a valid score for functional
        interventions  were  assigned.  Researchers  responsible  for   limitations. This scale evaluates the patient’s ability to perform
        evaluations were blinded to the intervention and control groups.  self-care, maintain sphincter control, transfer, and ambulate, as
          Patients were divided into two groups: The immediate NIV   well as cognitive functions such as communication and memory.
        group (NIVI)  and the conventional  NIV group (NIVC).  The   Scores range from 1 to 7, with the lowest score indicating total
        NIVI group received NIV immediately following orotracheal   dependence and the highest score reflecting complete independence
        extubation,  while  the  NIVC  group  received  NIV  on  the  first   from a functional perspective. The maximum possible score is 126
        post-operative day, approximately 24 h after extubation.  points when all variables are combined [14].
          NIV was administered using the Servo-S ventilator (Dräger   The MRC scale evaluates  peripheral  muscle strength by
        Medical,  Germany)  in  pressure support  ventilation  mode,   assessing the ability  to overcome  resistance  in six muscle
        with  pressure  sufficient  to  maintain  tidal  volume  between  6   groups: shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, wrist extensors, hip
        to 8 mL/kg, PEEP starting at 5 cm H O and increasing to 12 cm   flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors. Each group is
                                     2
        H O, and an inspired oxygen fraction  (F O )  of  30%. A  face   scored bilaterally from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates the absence of
         2
                                           2
                                          I
        mask was utilized, and PEEP adjustments were protocol-driven   contraction and five represents the patient overcoming maximum
        for  all  patients.  This  therapy  was  maintained  for  40  min  in   resistance imposed by the examiner. The minimum score for this
        both groups and was performed only once. Arterial blood gas   test is 0 (indicative of quadriplegia), while the maximum score
        analysis  was conducted  before  and after  NIV for evaluation   is 60 (indicating preserved muscle strength). A score below 48
        of gas exchange, with a follow-up analysis performed one day   may suggest the presence of polyneuromyopathy [15].
        later for assessment of oxygenation.
          On the day of discharge from the ICU, patients were reassessed   2.6. Measurement of pulmonary function
        using FIM and the MRC scale, and they were also evaluated for   To assess vital capacity (VC), the Ferraris Mark 8 Wright
        pulmonary complications, mortality, and length of stay in the   Respirometer (Wright, USA) was used. The respirometer was
        ICU. These assessments were repeated on the day of hospital   unlocked  and  cleared;  a  facial  mask  was then  placed  on  the
        discharge, along with a repetition of the 6MWT. All patients   individual’s face.  The patient  was instructed  to take a deep
        received standard physiotherapy assistance, which included   breath until reaching total lung capacity, followed by a slow
        kinesiotherapy, cycle ergometry, and walking exercises.
          Outcomes  related  to  post-operative  complications  were   and gradual expiration  until reaching  residual volume. After
        assessed by a blinded radiologist. Gasometric  and functional   this, the respirometer was locked, and the result was recorded.
        evaluations  were conducted  by a blinded  physician  and   The test was repeated three times, with the highest value being
        physiotherapist, respectively. Due to the nature of the   considered.                                    ®
        intervention, blinding of patients and unit staff was not feasible.  Peak expiratory flow was measured using the Mini Wright
                                                               peak  flow  meter  (Wright,  USA).  During  the  evaluation,  the
        2.5. Measurements                                      patient  was seated with the head in a neutral position and a
                                                               nasal clip to prevent air escape through the nostrils. The patient
          The 6MWT was conducted following the recommendations
        of  the American  Thoracic  Society  (ATS)  in  a  flat,  obstacle-  took a deep breath to total lung capacity, followed by a forced
        free  corridor  measuring  30  m  [13]. Before  the  test,  patients   expiration into the device. After three measurements, the highest
        were given a rest period of at least 10  min. During this   value was selected, ensuring that no individual measurement
        time, contraindications were assessed, and vital signs were   differed by more than 40 L from the others.
        recorded, including blood pressure (using a Premium Aneroid   2.7. Calculation of statistical power
        Sphygmomanometer [Welch Allyn, United States of America
        [USA] and Littmann 3M  stethoscope [USA]), pulse oximetry   In our study, 79 patients were evaluated, revealing a standard
                            ®
        (pulse oximeter from Rossmax  [USA]), dyspnea level (assessed   deviation in average oxygenation of 191 mmHg in the control
                                ®
        using the Borg scale),  heart  rate  (measured  by palpating  the   group  and  266  mmHg  in  the  training  group,  resulting  in  a
        radial artery for 1  min), and respiratory rate (evaluated  by   difference of 75 mmHg between the two groups.
        observing respiratory movements over 1 min).             The convenience sample provided a statistical power of 30%
          Patients  were  instructed  to  walk  as  quickly  as  possible  –   (alpha = 5%). A convenience sample is a non-random sampling
        without running – around the corridor for 6 min. Encouragement   method where participants  are selected  based on their easy
        was provided at intervals throughout the test. At the end of the   availability or proximity to the researcher, rather than through
        6 min, the examiner recorded the total distance covered.  a random or systematic  process.  This sample  type  is often
          Throughout the entire protocol, patients were monitored   used in exploratory research, where time, cost, or access to a
        closely. The test would be interrupted if there was an increase   specific population is limited. However, as it is not random, a
        in systolic or diastolic blood pressure greater than 30% from   convenience sample may not be representative of the broader
        baseline,  a  heart  rate  drop  of  more  than  20%  from  baseline,   population, potentially introducing bias into the results.
        peripheral oxygen saturation below 90%, or a respiratory rate   In addition, the standard deviation in average distance walked
        exceeding 30 breaths/min.                              was 322 m in the control group and 378 m in the training group,

                                               DOI: http://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.24.00011
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31