Page 37 - JCTR-10-6
P. 37

Musawi et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(6): 343-347   347
        educators, as comprehension is considered a crucial factor for   [3]   ADEA  Policy  Statements:  Recommendations  and
        excellent performance as a dental student and future professional.  Guidelines  for  Academic  Dental  institutions.  J  Dent
                                                                    Educ 2017;81:869-81.
        5. Conclusion                                               doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2017.81.7.tb06305.x

          Results of the current study suggested that the manual dexterity   [4]   Lundergan WP, Soderstrom EJ, Chambers DW. Tweezer
        subtest of BOT-2 may be able to reliably predict the level of   Dexterity  Aptitude  of  Dental  Students.  J  Dent  Educ
        innate hand skill and task comprehension abilities of prospective   2007;71:1090-7.
        dental students during the admissions process. Therefore, dental      doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.8.tb04375.x
        educators should consider using BOT-2 as a predictive tool to   [5]   Kothe C, Hissbach J, Hampe W. Prediction of Practical
        identify the innate hand skills of students. However, additional   Performance  in  Preclinical  Laboratory  Courses:  The
        studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to verify the   Return of Wire Bending for Admission of Dental Students
        findings  of  the  current  study.  Further,  dental  schools  should   in Hamburg. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2014;31:Doc22.
        consider using this combination of BOT-2 and LAP II as part      doi: 10.3205/zma000914
        of the  admissions  process  to  improve  student retention and,   [6]   Suksudaj  N,  Townsend  GC,  Kaidonis  J,  Lekkas  D,
        ultimately, the quality of oral care provided to patients.  Winning TA. Acquiring Psychomotor Skills in Operative
        Acknowledgments                                             Dentistry: Do Innate Ability and Motivation Matter? Eur
                                                                    J Dent Educ 2012;16:e18794.
          The authors would like to acknowledge the ATSU Research      doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00696.x
        and Sponsored Programs for their support of the present study.  [7]   Musawi A, Barrett T, Nurrohman H, Bhatia S, Smith K.
        Funding                                                     Assessing  Likelihood  of  Using  the  Bruininks-Oseretsky
                                                                    Test of Motor Proficiency to Predict Preclinical Performance
          None.                                                     of Dental Students. Clin Exp Dent Res 2019;5:513-8.
        Conflicts of Interest                                       doi: 10.1002/cre2.217
                                                               [8]   Bruininks  RH.  Bruininks-Oseretsky  Test  of  Motor
          The authors reported no competing interests.              Proficiency: Examiner’s Manual. OCLC Number: 4491119.
        Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate                  Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1978.
                                                               [9]   Bruininks  R,  Bruininks  B.  Bruininks-Oseretsky  Test
          This  study  was  exempted  by  the  ATSU  IRB  (A.T.  Still   of  Motor  Proficiency.  2   ed.  Minneapolis,  MN:  NCS
                                                                                        nd
        University)  under  section  45CFR46.101(b)(2).  No  further   Pearson; 2005.
        review was necessary. Consent was provided by the students      doi: 10.1300/J006v27n04_06
        participating in the study and their signatures were acquired.  [10]  Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the bruininks-

        Consent for Publication                                     oseretsky  test  of  motor  proficiency,  second  edition
                                                                    (BOT-2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007;27:87-102.
          Consent was acquired from the study participants to publish      doi: 10.1080/J006v27n04_06
        their data.                                            [11]  Feil  P,  Reed T,  Hart  JK. The  transfer  effect  of  leadup
        Availability of Data                                        activities. J Dent Educ 1990;54(10):609-11.
                                                                    doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1990.54.10.tb02470.x
          Data  is  available  from  the  corresponding  author  upon   [12]  Boushell LW, Walter R, Phillips C. Learn-a-prep II as
        reasonable request.                                         a predictor of psychomotor performance in a restorative
        References                                                  dentistry course. J Dent Educ 2011;75:1362-9.
                                                                    doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2011.75.10.tb05182.x
        [1]   Ranney RR,  Wilson MB, Bennett RB. Evaluation of   [13]  Khalaf ME, Alkhubaizi Q, Alomari QD. Layered Base
             Applicants  to  Predoctoral  Dental  Education  Programs:   Plate Blocks and Operative Dentistry Skills. J Contemp
             Review of the Literature. J Dent Educ 2005;69:1095-106.  Dent Pract 2018;19:554-9.
             doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.10.tb04010.x          doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2298
        [2]   Curtis  DA,  Lind  SL,  Plesh  O,  Finzen  FC.  Correlation   [14]  Portelli  M,  Matarese  G,  Militi  A,  Cordasco  G,
             of Admissions Criteria with Academic Performance in    Lucchese A. A Proportional Correlation Index for Space
             Dental Students. J Dent Educ 2007;71:1314-21.          Analysis  in  Mixed  Dentition  Derived  from  an  Italian
             doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.10.tb04395.x          Population Sample. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012;13:113-7.
                                                               Publisher’s note
                                                               AccScience  Publishing  remains  neutral  with  regard  to
                                                               jurisdictional  claims in published maps and institutional
                                                               affiliations.

                                               DOI: http://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.24.00009
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42