Page 19 - JCTR-11-4
P. 19

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                                          Hidden cancer after VTE



            follow-up, malignancy was diagnosed in 3.7% and 5.0% of   that  compared  extensive  versus limited screening  for
            the extensive and limited screening groups, respectively.   occult malignancy after an unprovoked VTE, as well as
            In the extensive screening group, 26 patients (7.6%) died   five observational prospective studies that evaluated a
            compared with 24 (8.3%) in the limited screening group   comprehensive strategy lacking a control group. 20-22,24,25
            (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.6 – 2.2). Among these   Among 2621  patients included, we estimated the
            deaths, 17  (5.0%) in the extensive screening group and   24-month prevalence of occult cancer detection to be 8.2%.
            8 (2.8%) in the limited screening group were cancer-related   About two-thirds of these cases were detected by screening
            (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.7 – 4.3).                     tests, whereas the remaining one-third became clinically
              In a pilot study, the use of PET/CT to screen for occult   overt during follow-up. The pooled analysis of the RCTs
            malignancy in 40  patients with unprovoked VTE was   demonstrated that the probability of a cancer diagnosis
            prospectively  investigated .  All patients  were  initially   was strongly associated with extensive screening. At initial
                                 25
            screened  for  occult  malignancy  with  a  focused  history,   screening, a comprehensive strategy detected more than
            physical, and laboratory evaluation. Patients underwent   twice as many occult cancer cases compared to a limited
            whole-body PET/CT and were followed for up to 2 years.   test. Moreover, there was a strong trend towards a diagnosis
            PET/CT imaging identified abnormal findings requiring   of early-stage cancer in the extensive screening group
            additional assessment in 62.5% of patients (25 out of   when data from RCTs was analyzed separately. However,
            40 patients). Among them, only one patient had confirmed   no statistically significant difference was observed in
            cancer. No patients with a negative PET/CT were diagnosed   cancer- and overall-related mortality.
            with malignancy during the follow-up.                Early detection of an occult malignancy after a
              In the Alfonso et al. study,  patients ≥50 years old with   diagnosis of unprovoked VTE might be translated to
                                   25
            a first unprovoked VTE episode underwent screening for   a better prognosis for these patients; nevertheless, the
            occult cancer with PET/CT, which was performed 3 –   optimal  screening strategy  remains unclear. At present,
            4 weeks after the VTE event. Clinical follow-up continued   there is no evidence that testing for undiagnosed cancer
            for 2  years. The PET/CT was negative in 68 out of   in patients with  a first episode of unprovoked  VTE is
            99 patients (68.7%), while suspicious uptake was detected   effective in reducing cancer- and overall-related mortality
            in 31 out of 99  patients (31.3%). Additional diagnostic   or which tests for cancer are most helpful. On the other
            work-up confirmed a malignancy in 7 out of 31 patients   hand, two rules have been developed for occult cancer
            (22.6%), with six at an early stage. During follow-up,   screening in patients with VTE: The RIETE and SOME
                                                                                      26
            two patients with negative PET/CT were diagnosed with   scores. Jara-Palomares  et al.  identified six independent
            cancer. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and   predictors (RIETE score) of occult cancer between 30 days
            negative predictive value of PET/CT were 77.8%, 22.6%,   and 24  months after experiencing the VTE (provoked
            and 97.1%, respectively.                           or  unprovoked):  male  sex,  age >70  years,  chronic  lung
                                                               disease, anemia (hemoglobin levels <13  g/dL for men
              In these studies, 3.6% (35 out of 977) of patients   and <12 g/dL for women), elevated platelet count (≥350,000
            were diagnosed with cancer at initial screening, and 36   platelets/mm ), prior VTE, and recent surgery. Ihaddadene
                                                                         3
            additional cases (3.7%) were detected during follow-up.   et al.  performed a post hoc analysis of the SOME trial.
                                                                   27
            In the analysis of the studies with available data, cancer-  They found that age ≥60  years, previous provoked VTE,
            related mortality was 2.7% (25 out of 926), and the overall   and current smoker were associated with occult cancer
            mortality rate was 8.4% (69 out of 819).           detection within 1  year of a diagnosis of unprovoked
              Regarding  the  risk  of  bias,  only  the  study  by  Van   VTE. These rules are a potentially attractive strategy for
            Doormaal et al.  included a cohort of unexposed patients   occult cancer screening in patients with VTE; however,
                        23
            (limited tests). The studies by Jara-Palomares et al.  and   both scores’ predictive performance was poor in external
                                                     20
            Rieu et al.  were considered unrepresentative of the case   validation studies. 28-32
                    22
            sample as they included only patients with PE and aged over   The results of our study are in accordance with previous
            70 years, respectively. Therefore, all studies were considered   meta-analyses. 11,33,34  Klein et al.  and Robertson et al.  did
                                                                                                         34
                                                                                       33
            to have a moderate risk of bias, except the study by Van   not include the observational prospective studies in their
            Doormaal et al.,  which was regarded as low risk (Table 5).  meta-analysis, and in another meta-analysis of individual
                        23
                                                                         11
                                                                                                        16
            4. Discussion                                      patient data,  the trial conducted by Piccioli et al.  was
                                                               not included. Our study strengthens the results of previous
            This systematic review compiled four RCTs. 16-19  and one   meta-analyses, yet, it is more extensive and includes more
            prospective open-label study without randomization    studies and patients.
                                                         23
            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        13                            doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00069
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24