Page 55 - JCTR-11-4

Journal of Clinical and
Translational Research Female are better in otoacoustic emissions tests

Availability of data 11. Sequi-Canet JM, Sala-Langa MJ, Collar Del Castillo JI.
Perinatal factors affecting the detection of otoacoustic
The database belongs to the public health service and is emissions in vaginally delivered, healthy newborns,
accessible upon obtaining the appropriate authorization. during the first 48 hours of life. Acta Otorrinolaringol
Esp. 2014;65(1):1-7.
References
doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2013.07.007
1. Ross DS, Holstrum WJ, Gaffney M, Green D, Oyler RF,
Gravel JS. Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation 12. Bilger RC, Matthies ML, Hammel DR, Demorest ME.
of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence
Trends Amplif. 2008;12(1):27-34. of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res.
1990;33(3):418-432.
doi: 10.1177/1084713807306241
doi: 10.1044/jshr.3303.418
2. Berninger E. Characteristics of normal newborn transient-
evoked otoacoustic emissions: Ear asymmetries and sex 13. Morlet T, Lapillonne A, Ferber C, et al. Spontaneous
effects. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(11):661-669. otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: Prevalence and
gender effects. Hear Res. 1995;90(1-2):44-54.
doi: 10.1080/14992020701438797
doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00144-4
3. Cassidy JW, Ditty KM. Gender differences among newborns
on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing. J Music 14. Wissler KZ, Nagao K, Greenwood LA, Gaffney RG,
Ther. 2001;38(1):28-35. Cardinale RM, Morlet T. Ear effect and gender difference of
spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory
doi: 10.1093/jmt/38.1.28 processing disorder. Proc Meet Acoust. 2014;21(1):050004.
4. Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Transient doi: 10.1121/1.4891623
evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: Effects of gender, ear
asymmetry and activity status. Audiology. 1997;36(2):61-71. 15. McFadden D, Loehlin JC, Pasanen EG. Additional findings
on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear
doi: 10.3109/00206099709071961 mechanisms: Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res.
5. Saitoh Y, Sakoda T, Hazama M, et al. Transient evoked 1996;97(1-2):102-119.
otoacoustic emissions in newborn infants: Effects 16. Aloufi N, Heinrich A, Marshall K, Kluk K. Sex differences
of ear asymmetry, gender, and age. J Otolaryngol. and the effect of female sex hormones on auditory function:
2006;35(2):133-138. A systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1077409.
doi: 10.2310/7070.2005.4127 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1077409
6. Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff I, Olsha M, Attias J. Click 17. McFadden D. Sexual orientation and the auditory system.
evoked otoacoustic emissions: Inter-aural and gender Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011;32(2):201-213.
differences in newborns. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol.
1997;8(3):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.02.001
doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.1997.8.3.133 18. McFadden D, Pasanen EG, Valero MD, Roberts EK, Lee TM.
Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic
7. Johansson M, Olofsson Å, Berninger E. Twin study of emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries). Horm
neonatal transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res. Behav. 2009;55(1):98-105.
2020;398:108108.
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.013
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108108
19. McFadden D. Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.
8. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of Hear Res. 2009;252(1-2):37-48.
otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990;11(2):93-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.002
doi: 10.1097/00003446-199004000-00004
20. Morlet T, Perrin E, Durrant JD, et al. Development of
9. Cavalcante JMS, Isaac MDL. Analysis of otoacoustic cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between
emissions in neonates at term and preterm. Braz J gender. Neurosci Lett. 1996;220(1):49-52.
Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(5):582-588.
doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(96)13226-2
doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130104
21. McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear
10. Thornton ARD, Marotta N, Kennedy CR. The order of asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and
testing effect in otoacoustic emissions and its consequences otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res. 1993;68(2):143-151.
for sex and ear differences in neonates. Hear Res.
2003;184(1-2):123-130. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90118-k
doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00234-x 22. Durante AS, Carvalho RMM. Contralateral suppression

Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025) 49 doi: 10.36922/jctr.8416