Page 56 - JCTR-11-4
P. 56

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                         Female are better in otoacoustic emissions tests



               of otoacoustic emissions in neonates.  Int J Audiol.   Orta-Sibu N. Breastfeeding results in better hearing in
               2002;41(4):211-215.                                newborns  compared  to  bottle-feeding.  J  Clin  Transl  Res.
                                                                  2020;6(3):81-86.
               doi: 10.3109/14992020209078333
                                                                  doi: 10.18053/jctres.06.202003.003
            23.  Summers V. Sex differences in number of X chromosomes
               and X-chromosome inactivation in females promote   30.  Nolan LS. Age-related hearing loss: Why we need to
               greater variability in hearing among males. Biol Sex Differ.   think  about sex  as a  biological variable.  J  Neurosci Res.
               2022;13(1):49.                                     2020;98(9):1705-1720.
               doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00457-9                    doi: 10.1002/jnr.24647
            24.  Krizman J, Skoe E, Kraus N. Sex differences in auditory   31.  Liu J, Wang N.  Effect of  age on click-evoked otoacoustic
               subcortical function. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(3):590-597.  emission: A  systematic review.  Neural Regen Res.
                                                                  2012;7(11):853-861.
               doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.037
                                                                  doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.11.010
            25.  Ahadi M, Pourbakht A, Jafari AH, Shirjian Z, Jafarpisheh AS.
               Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally   32.  Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE,  et al. Identification of
               presented speech stimuli: An auditory evoked potentials   neonatal hearing impairment: Transient evoked otoacoustic
               study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(3):239-243.     emissions during the perinatal period.  Ear Hear.
                                                                  2000;21(5):425-442.
               doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.10.010
                                                                  doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00008
            26.  Foust T, Eiserman W, Shisler L, Geroso A. Using otoacoustic
               emissions to screen young children for hearing loss in   33.  Akinpelu OV, Peleva E, Funnell WRJ, Daniel SJ. Otoacoustic
               primary care settings. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):118-123.  emissions  in  newborn  hearing screening:  A  systematic
                                                                  review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes.
               doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3868
                                                                  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(5):711-717.
            27.  Ismail H, Thornton ARD. The interaction between
               ear and sex differences and stimulus rate.  Hear Res.      doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.021
               2003;179(1-2):97-103.                           34.  McFadden D, Loehlin JC. On the heritability of spontaneous
                                                                  otoacoustic emissions: A twins study. Hear Res. 1995;85(1-
               doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00099-6
                                                                  2):181-198.
            28.  Sequí Canet JM, Mir Plana B, Paredes Cencillo C, Brines
               Solanes  J,  Marco  Algarra  J.  Aumento  del  estímulo  en  las      doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00045-6
               otoemisiones acústicas evocadas [Stimulation increase   35.  McFadden D. A masculinizing effect on the auditory systems
               in evoked acoustic otoemissions].  An Esp Pediatr.   of human females having male co-twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci
               1998;48(3):274-276.                                U S A. 1993;90(24):11900-11904.
            29.  Sequi-Canet  JM,  Sequi-Sabater  JM,  Collar-Castillo  JI,      doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11900
































            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        50                               doi: 10.36922/jctr.8416
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61