Page 122 - MI-2-2
P. 122

Microbes & Immunity                                               Physiological and cognitive effects of PASC



            (loading=0.6),  breathlessness  (loading=0.5),  fatigue  Among the 52 participants who responded that they knew
            (loading=0.4),  sleep  issues  (loading=0.4),  and  cranial   their variant, 4 (~8%) specified Delta, 22 (~42%) specified
            nerve dysfunction (loading=0.4). This factor aligned with   Omicron, 4 (~8%) specified a subvariant of Omicron, and
            the respiratory cluster found in the duration analysis.   22 (~42%) specified the original strain of the virus. This
            Intriguingly, cough stands out as a particularly significant   variation in the proportion of participants affected could
            symptom due to its high loading in duration and severity   be a result of variation in the degree of contagiousness or
            analysis. The persistent nature of these respiratory symptoms   time periods in which these variants were most prevalent.
            highlights their substantial physical burden on patients.  The original strain of SARS-CoV-2 was the dominant strain
                                                               from January 2020 to June 2021, which may explain why
              Factor 3, labeled as sensory dysfunction, includes
            dysgeusia (loading=1) and anosmia (loading=0.7),   42% of participants reported being infected with it. On the
                                                               other hand, the Delta variant was most prevalent from June
            indicating alterations in taste and smell perception in PACS   to mid-December 2021.  The Omicron variant replaced
                                                                                  40
            patients. These sensory impairments can impact patients’   the Delta variant in mid-December 2021 and remained
            quality of life, potentially worsening psychological distress,   prevalent until mid-2022 when it mutated into several
            and complicating recovery efforts.
                                                               subvariants, such as EG.5 (“Eris”) and BA.2.86 (“Pirola”),
              Finally, Factor 4, labeled as depression, consists   which remain prevalent to this day. Yale Medicine has also
            of  depression  (loading=0.7)  and  suicidal  thoughts   noted that Omicron and its subvariants were the most
            (loading=0.6). While suicidal thoughts indicate a major   contagious strains, which could contribute to the large
            area of worry, their relatively lower loading compared to   proportion of participants infected with this strain. Among
            depression indicates that depression is a core component of   those who knew their variant, there was significant variation
            this factor. This relationship warrants further investigation   in the strain they were infected with and the time period of
            into how clinical populations may experience depression,   each variant’s prevalence. Therefore, no clear conclusions
            especially in light of other illnesses.            can be drawn about the effects of a specific variant.

            4. Discussion                                        Due to COVID-19’s worldwide prevalence, this study can
                                                               educate others on the risks associated with the virus. More
            The study was designed based on findings from extensive   specifically, PACS, which continues to cause physiological
            literature examining specific COVID-19 aftereffects and   and neurological effects with unknown timeframes, has
            their symptoms. 10-38  Recent data from the 2022 National   affected  millions  of people across  the US.  By surveying
            Health Interview Survey evaluating the ongoing symptoms   individuals who tested positive for COVID-19, connections
            of post-COVID-19 in the U S demonstrate that long-term   can be made between demographic factors and symptoms to
            symptoms are influenced by different demographics.    better understand the longevity of COVID-19 effects. This
                                                         39
            Regarding age distribution, the self-reporting survey   study can aid clinics, research projects, and public health
            revealed  that  adults aged 35 –  49  showed  higher   experts in understanding and improving the prevention
            susceptibility to PACS compared to other group ages (18 –   and treatment of PACS. In addition, the findings can raise
                                    39
            34, 50 – 64, and 65 or older).  Previous studies have also   awareness about PACS among healthcare providers and
            indicated differences across biological sex, with women   the public to understand potential symptoms and support
            being 3.3% more likely than men to experience PACS   affected individuals. This study can also incentivize the
            symptoms following infection.  Furthermore, the interview   establishment of community support groups for those
                                   39
            showed that the percentage of adults with PACS varied by   dealing with the long-term impacts of COVID-19.
            race. Asian adults were less likely to have PACS compared to   However, it is important to acknowledge that the
            Black, White, and Hispanic groups. Hispanic adults were the   participant sample size may be too limited to address such a
            most likely to experience PACS (8.3%), followed by White   significant issue. The geographic focus of this study is largely
            and then Black adults.  Finally, the percentage of adults with   concentrated in the Western US, limiting its generalizability
                             39
            PACS differed by the level of urbanization, as PACS was less   to other regions or populations. Expanding the geographic
            prevalent in adults living in large central metropolitan areas   scope of future studies to an international scale would
            compared to medium to small metropolitan areas. 39
                                                               increase their relevance to the broader population.
              One initial goal of this study was to analyze variant-  In addition, the study has a higher representation of
            specific impacts. However, it is difficult to draw   participants of Asian descent, making the results more
            connections  between  specific  SARS-CoV-2  variants,  the   pertinent  to  the  Asian-American  population.  Gender
            severity of infection, and the duration of symptoms. Of the   also serves as a limitation, with 63% of the participants
            110 participants, 58 (~53%) responded “I don’t know” when   being female compared to 36% male. While the data and
            asked which variant of COVID-19 they were infected with.   implications are relevant to both groups, the higher female


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                        114                               doi: 10.36922/mi.8545
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127