Page 120 - MI-2-2
P. 120

Microbes & Immunity                                               Physiological and cognitive effects of PASC



            decreased from 0.319 for the no-booster group to 0.16 3 for   mental strain affecting patients’ behavior and mental
            the three-booster group, while duration scores decreased   health. The loading score of 1.0 for behavior indicates a
            from 0.714 to 0.444, respectively, suggesting a downward   strong correlation with the overall factor, suggesting that
            trend with increasing boosters.                    PASC patients experience severe behavior disruptions.
              The majority of participants (67.3%) were infected with   Factor 3, identified as sensory dysfunction, comprised
            COVID-19 after receiving at least a second vaccine dose   of dysgeusia (loading=0.8), anosmia (loading=0.7), and
            (Table 4). Of the remaining 32.7%, 1.8% were infected   cranial nerve dysfunction (loading=0.4). As all these
            after their single-dose vaccine. Males were more likely to   symptoms are sensory nerve-related conditions, the high
            become infected before completing their first complete   loading values for dysgeusia and anosmia, as well as their
            course of vaccination (two doses for double-dose vaccine,   high correlation value, indicate their strong association.
            one dose for single-dose vaccine), with 35% of males being   Factor 4 was categorized as depression, encompassing
            infected before a full vaccination compared to 29% of   depression  (loading=0.9)  and  suicidal  thoughts
            females. However, the variability in vaccination efficacy   (loading=0.4),  both  of  which  also  exhibited  a  high
            between genders may be due to sampling variability. The   correlation in early analysis. The dominant loading for
            lower infection rate after the second booster compared to   depression emphasizes the significant mental health
            other categories is likely due to a lower rate of vaccination   implications of PACS,  suggesting  that  affected  patients
            for the second booster (45.5%) and the timing of the   would benefit from comprehensive neuropsychiatric
            second booster release.                            evaluation and support.
              EFA identified  four factors for  symptom  severity:   For  symptom  duration,  EFA similarly identified  four
            Respiratory and fatigue symptoms (e.g., cough      factors: Psychological and cognitive (e.g., stress and
            and breathlessness), psychological and behavioral   working memory), respiratory and fatigue (e.g., cough and
            disturbance  (e.g., brain  fog  and stress),  sensory   sleep), sensory dysfunction (e.g., dysgeusia and anosmia),
            dysfunction (e.g., dysgeusia and anosmia), and depression   and depression (e.g., depression and suicidal thoughts)
            (e.g.,  depression  and  suicidal  thoughts)  (Figure  5).  We   (Figure 6). These categories, for the most part, aligned with
            classified Factor 1 as respiratory and fatigue symptoms,   the factors constructed for symptom severity, reinforcing
            including symptoms such as cough (loading=0.9),    the strong correlation between symptom severity and
            sleep disturbances (loading=0.7), throat sensitivity   duration. We classified Factor 1 as psychological and
            (loading=0.6),  fatigue  (loading=0.5),  and breathlessness   cognitive strain, characterized by symptoms including
            (loading=0.4). This cluster reflects symptoms associated   behavioral severity (loading=0.9), stress (loading=0.8), and
            with both respiratory and fatigue-related problems. The   working memory (loading=0.6). This grouping contrasts
            high loading value of cough indicates that it is a key   with the duration analysis, which categorized behavioral
            symptom within this factor, consistent with the known   and  psychological  symptoms  separately  from  cognitive
            respiratory effects of PASC. These findings suggest that   impairments (Figure  5). The  severity analysis  indicates
            patients in this cluster disproportionately suffer from   that elevated stress and behavioral disruptions are closely
            breathing difficulties and energy level impairments.  linked  to  cognitive  strain,  suggesting  that  mental  health
              Factor 2 revealed the psychological impact of PASC   challenges may worsen cognitive symptoms in patients
            through psychological and behavioral disturbance,   with PACS.
            characterized by behavior (loading=1.0) and stress   Factor 2, identified as respiratory and fatigue
            (loading=0.8). This factor demonstrates the significant   severity,  includes  cough  (loading=0.8),  throat  sensitivity

            Table 4. The distribution of participants’ infection timing relative to vaccination status
            Vaccination status  Number   Male    Female   Prefer not to   Number    Male   Female   Prefer not to
                              of people   infected  infected  say infected  of people   infected   infected   say infected
                              infected                                infected (%)  (%)     (%)        (%)
            Before vaccination   24       11       13         0          21.80     27.50    18.80       0
            After 1  dose        12        4       8          0          10.90     10.00    11.60       0
                 st
            After 2  dose        33       13       20         0          30.00     32.50    29.00       0
                 nd
            After 1  booster shot  30      7       22         1          27.30     17.50    31.90     100.00
                 st
                 nd
            After 2  booster shot  7       2       5          0          6.40       5.00    7.20        0
            After 3  booster shot  4       3       1          0          3.60       7.50    1.40        0
                 rd
            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                        112                               doi: 10.36922/mi.8545
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125