Page 87 - MSAM-1-1
P. 87

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                                A ML model for AM PSP of Ti64



            Formal Analysis: Xi Gong, Dongrui Zeng                measurement of spatial correlation functions in multiphase
                                                                  solids. J Appl Phys, 45: 3159–3164.
            Validation: Xi Gong
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1663741
            Visualization: Xi Gong, Willem Groeneveld-Meijer, Guha
               Manogharan                                      11.  Lu B, Torquato S, 1992, Lineal-path function for random
                                                                  heterogeneous materials. Phys Rev A, 45: 922–929.
            Writing – Original Draft: Xi Gong, Guha Manogharan
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.922
            Writing – Review and Editing: Willem Groeneveld-   12.  Gan Z, Li H, Wolff SJ, et al., 2019, Data-driven microstructure
               Meijer, Guha Manogharan
                                                                  and microhardness design in additive manufacturing using
            References                                            a self-organizing map. Engineering, 5: 730–735.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.014
            1.   Frazier WE, 2014, Metal additive manufacturing: A review.
               J Mater Eng Perform, 23: 1917–1928.             13.  Thijs L, Verhaeghe F, Craeghs T, et al., 2010, A study of the
                                                                  microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
                                                                  Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater, 58: 3303–3312.
            2.   Trelewicz JR, Halada GP,  Donaldson  OK,  et  al.,  2016,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004
               Microstructure and corrosion resistance of laser additively
               manufactured 316L stainless steel. JOM, 68: 850–859.  14.  Li  GC,  Li  J,  Tian  XJ,  et  al.,  2017,  Microstructure  and
                                                                  properties of a novel titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2V-1.5Mo-
            3.   Bostanabad R, Bui AT, Xie W,  et  al., 2016, Stochastic   0.5Zr-0.3Si manufactured by laser additive manufacturing.
               microstructure characterization and reconstruction via   Mater Sci Eng A, 684: 233–238.
               supervised learning. Acta Mater, 103: 89–102.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.084
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.044
                                                               15.  Paulson NH, Priddy MW, McDowell DL,  et  al., 2019,
            4.   Kalidindi SR, 2015, Data science and cyberinfrastructure:   Reduced-order microstructure-sensitive protocols to rank-
               Critical enablers for accelerated development of hierarchical   order the transition fatigue resistance of polycrystalline
               materials. Int Mater Rev, 60: 150–168.
                                                                  microstructures. Int J Fatigue, 119: 1–10.
               https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000043
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.011
            5.   Popova E, Rodgers TM, Gong X,  et  al., 2017, Process-  16.  Fernandez-Zelaia P, Nguyen V, Zhang H, et al., 2019, The
               structure linkages using a data science approach: Application   effects of material anisotropy on secondary processing of
               to simulated additive manufacturing data.  Integr Mater   additively manufactured CoCrMo. Addit Manuf, 29: 100764.
               Manuf Innov, 6: 54–68.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.015
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0088-1
                                                               17.  Yang  Z,  Yabansu  YC,  Al-Bahrani  R,  et  al.,  2018,  Deep
            6.   Greitemeier D, Donne CD, Schoberth A,  et  al., 2015,   learning approaches for mining structure-property linkages
               Uncertainty  of  additive  manufactured  Ti-6Al-4V:  in high contrast composites from simulation datasets.
               Chemistry, microstructure and mechanical properties. Appl   Comput Mater Sci, 151: 278–287.
               Mech Mater, 807: 169–180.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.014
               https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.807.169
                                                               18.  Manogharan G, Wysk R, Harrysson O, et al., 2015, AIMS-a
            7.   Markl M, Körner C, 2016, Multiscale modeling of powder   metal  additive-hybrid  manufacturing system:  System
               bed-based additive manufacturing.  Annu Rev Mater Res,   architecture and attributes. Proc Manuf, 1: 273–286.
               46: 93–123.
                                                               19.  Zhang W, Qin P, Wang Z,  et  al., 2019, Superior wear
               https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032158
                                                                  resistance in EBM-Processed TC4 alloy compared with SLM
            8.   Li J, Zhou X, Brochu M,  et  al., 2020, Solidification   and forged samples. Materials (Basel), 12: 2–13.
               microstructure simulation of Ti-6Al-4V in metal additive      https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050782
               manufacturing: A review. Addit Manuf, 31: 100989.
                                                               20.  Edwards P, Ramulu M, 2014, Fatigue performance
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100989
                                                                  evaluation of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng
            9.   Liu S, Shin YC, 2019, Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V   A, 598: 327–337.
               alloy: A review. Mater Des, 164: 107552.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.041
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552
                                                               21.  Matouš K, Geers MG, Kouznetsova VG, et al., 2017, A review
            10.  Corson PB, 1974, Correlation functions for predicting   of predictive nonlinear theories for multiscale modeling of
               properties of heterogeneous materials. I. Experimental   heterogeneous materials. J Comput Phys, 330: 192–220.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2022)                         15                     https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i1.6
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90