Page 33 - MSAM-1-4
P. 33

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                       Process optimization of SEBM IN718 via ML



            Table 5. Columnar grain width, hardness, and mechanical properties at room temperature of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective
            electron beam melting with the parameters listed in Table 4.
             Sample   Columnar grain width (μm)  Hardness (Hv)  Yield strength (MPa)  Tensile strength (MPa)  Elongation (%)
            P1             20.71±(16.51)     427.70±(32.59)   908.0±(5.0)       1009±(50)          7.6±(1.3)
            P2             22.36±(16.85)     440.15±(15.81)  954.5±(14.5)        1270±(9)         34.0±(1.7)
            P3             19.11±(15.30)     424.09±(17.34)  914.5±(10.5)       1215±(22)         22.1±(6.5)
            P4             14.36±(10.30)     410.82±(12.88)   876.0±(4.0)       1216±(30)         17.5±(3.9)


            during SEBM process resulting in precipitation of  γ′
            and  γ′′ phase. However, the deviation indicates that the
            microstructures and the precipitates were not uniform.
            The tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation at
            room temperature of the as-built samples are shown in
            Figure 12, and the detailed values are shown in Table 5.
            Although the four samples fabricated by optimized
            processing parameters obtained high relative density, the
            mechanical properties were different. Sample P1 had the
            worst mechanical properties, while sample P2 had the
            best, although both P1 and P2 were fabricated with the
            same energy density. Samples P1 and P3 had relatively
            higher relative density and similar hardness values, but
            the mechanical properties of sample P3 were significantly
            higher than that of sample P1, especially the elongation.   Figure  12. Tensile tests at room temperature of as-built Inconel 718
            Thereby, as for the SEBM-fabricated fully dense Inconel   samples with the parameters listed in Table 4.
            718  specimens,  it  is  far  from  adequate  to  take  energy
            density or relative density into consideration to optimize   thickness of the powder layer, and the input energy (beam
            the mechanical properties.                         current < 15 mA) is not enough to melt the thicker powder
            4. Discussion                                      layer, resulting in a huge lack-of-fusion defects, as shown
                                                               in  Figure  4B. With the further increase of input energy
            4.1. Relationships between surface morphology and   (15  mA < beam current < 25  mA), the molten pool is
            internal defects                                   enough to pass through the thick powder layer and prevent
            The pre-alloyed powder in this study was prepared by   lack-of-fusion defects,  and  the relative density increases
            plasma rotating electrode process; hence, the gas pore   correspondingly. When the input energy (beam current >
            inside the powder and gas pore induced defects can be   25 mA) is too high, the splashing of metal liquid or metal
            ignored. As shown in Figure 4, different combinations of   vapor makes it impossible to form. Figure 13B shows the
            parameters will give rise to different surface morphology in   effect of scan speed on relative density, and input energy
            SEBM process. Different surface morphology is related to   decreases with the increase of scan speed by fixing beam
            various types of internal defects. Uneven surface included   current. When the input energy gradually decreases, the
            lack-of-fusion defect or no defects, even surface included   surface morphology changes from even to porous, and
            shrinkage porosity defect, while porous surface included   the relative density decreases. As shown in Figure 14, the
            lack-of-fusion defect.                             sample with porous surface had a large number of lack-of-
              Figure 13A shows the effect of beam current on relative   fusion defects, which is the main reason for the low relative
            density,  and  input energy  increases  with  the  increase  of   density. Small and shallow molten pool was generated
            current by fixing scanning speed. When the input energy   due to the low input energy. The molten pool cannot
            gradually increases, the surface morphology changes from   effectively penetrate the new layer of powder and combine
            even to uneven, and the relative density first decreases   with the previous solidified layer. Balling effect causes the
            and then increases. The combined effect of the Marangoni   partially melted powder to form an isolated molten liquid.
            effect, vapor recoil pressure, and electron-beam agitation   Due  to  surface  tension  and  rapid  solidification,  molten
            results in an uneven surface . The convex and concave   liquid could not flow into pores and thus combine with
                                   [52]
            of the uneven surface led to a large difference in the   nearby powder . Therefore, the lack-of-fusion defects
                                                                           [53]
            Volume 1 Issue 4 (2022)                         10                    https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i4.23
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38