Page 61 - MSAM-1-4
P. 61

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             LPBF of Mg and its bio-applications


            the compression fatigue performance of Mg scaffolds.   and thus increases their degradation rate. In this case,
            A summary of the mechanical properties of the additively   the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys can be significantly
            manufactured biodegradable Mg alloys from the literature   improved by adopting high purification methods or
            is presented in Table 3.                           reducing the impurity concentration by improving
                                                               the processing technology. Han  et al.  found that the
                                                                                              [80]
            3.2. Degradation performance                       degradation rate of high purity Mg in vivo was much lower
            The previous studies have shown that AM prepared Mg   than that of Mg-containing iron impurities. Cao et al.
                                                                                                           [81]
            and  its alloys  possess  fine  grain  size  and  homogeneous   slowed down the corrosion rate of Mg alloys by adding a
            microstructure, which can obtain lower degradation rates,   certain amount of Zr to the molten Mg alloy to remove
            mainly due to improved passivation properties and reduced   the impurity iron.  Studies  have shown  that Zr and  iron
            micro-galvanic corrosion . Despite that, their corrosion   can easily form a precipitate phase, which precipitate at
                                [77]
            rate in the body fluid environment is still unable to meet the   the bottom of the melt, thereby achieving purification
                                                                             [82]
            needs of bone implants. For an ideal biodegradable bone   effect. Peng et al.  used a zone solidification method to
            metal implant, they have a corrosion rate of <0.5 mm/year   prepare Mg alloys and found that the corrosion rate of
            and need to provide mechanical support for 12 – 24 weeks   the alloys purified by this method was lower than that of
            to meet the clinical requirements [78,79] . This means that the   conventionally cast Mg alloys.
            AM-processed biodegradable Mg and its alloys implants
            need to be regulated. The corrosion resistance of the   3.2.2. Alloying treatment
            additively manufactured Mg and its alloys in the current   Alloying treatment is an effective way to improve the
            studies is summarized in Table 4.                  corrosion  resistance  of  Mg  alloys  by  changing  the
                                                               microstructure and the type of precipitates. At present,
            3.2.1. Scavenging effect                           researchers have developed a series of biological Mg
            Many impurities, such as iron, nickel, and copper, in Mg   alloys by alloying methods, and their properties have been
            and its alloy commonly exhibit relatively high potential.   studied. Shuai et al.  found that with the increase of Al
                                                                               [83]
            This causes the micro-galvanic corrosion with matrix   content,  α-Mg dendrites and intermetallic compounds

            Table 3. Mechanical performances of the LPBF‑manufactured biodegradable Mg alloys

                                Type                          Mechanical properties   Improvement mechanisms
             Shapes      Materials        Dimensions
            Block        ZK60 [41]       Cubic               Microhardness: 89.2 Hv   High densification, fine-grain
                                         6 × 6 × 6 mm 3                               strengthening, and solution
                                                                                      strengthening
                         AZ91D [46]      Bone-shaped gauge   UTS: 296 MPa,            Fine-grain strengthening
                                         25 × 6 × 2 mm 3     UYS: 254 MPa
                                                             Microhardness: 100 HV
                         AZ61 [49]       Bone-shaped gauge   UTS: 287.1 MPa,          Fine-grain and solid solution
                                         25 × 6 × 1.5 mm 3   UYS: 233.4 MPa,          strengthening
                                                             EL: 3.12%
                         GWZ1031K [53]   Bone-shaped gauge   UTS: 347 MPa             Fine-grain strengthening
                                         18 × 3 × 10 mm 3    UYS: 310 MPa
                                                             EL: 4.1%
                         Mg-8Zn [74]     Cuboid              Hardness: 71.5 Hv        Fine-grain strengthening
                                         5 × 5 × 3 mm 3
            Porous       Mg-Ca [50]      Cuboid              UCS: 111.19 MPa          Optimizing the laser parameters
                                         6 × 6 × 9 mm 3      Elastic modulus: 1.26 GPa
                         ZK61 [52]       Cuboid              Microhardness: 106.75 Hv  Fine-grain strengthening, solution
                                         6 × 6 × 9 mm 3      UCS: 50.95 MPa           strengthening, and precipitation
                                                             Elastic modulus: 0.91 GPa  strengthening
                         WE43 [75]       Cylindrical         Hardness: 77.41 Hv       Optimized structure of porous units
                                         D (6 mm),           UCS: 21.21 MPa
                                         H (6 mm)            Elastic modulus: 0.79 GPa
                         WE43 [76]       Cubic fluorite      UCS: 71.48 MPa           Optimized structure of porous units


            Volume 1 Issue 4 (2022)                         10                     https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i4.24
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66