Page 65 - MSAM-2-2
P. 65
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Cellulose microfiber in ABS filament for 3D printing
11. Morán JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, et al., 2007, Extraction of fibers from renewable resources using green chemistry for a
cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. circular economy. Glob Chall, 5: 2000065.
Cellulose, 15: 149–159.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000065
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9
23. Marques A, Cunha J, De Meyer A, et al., 2020, Contribution
12. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, et al., 2011, Cellulose towards a comprehensive methodology for wood-based
nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and biomass material flow analysis in a circular economy setting.
nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev, 40: 3941–3994. Forests, 11: 106.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010106
13. Silva DJ, D’Almeida MLO, 2009, Nanocristais de celulose 24. Nandy S, Goswami S, Marques A, et al., 2021, Cellulose:
[Cellulose nanocrystals]. O Papel, 70: 34–52. [Article in A contribution for the zero e-waste challenge. Adv Mater
Portuguese] Technol, 6: 2000994.
14. Silva R, Haraguchi SK, Muniz EC, et al., 2009, Applications https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202000994
of lignocellulosic fibers in polymer chemistry and in 25. Jahan I, Zhang G, Bhuiyan M, et al., 2022, Circular economy
composites. Quím Nova, 32: 661–671.
of construction and demolition wood waste-a theoretical
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000300010 framework approach. Sustainability, 14: 10478.
15. Zhang X, Yang H, Chen J, 2018, Life-cycle carbon budget of https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710478
China’s harvested wood products in 1900-2015. For Policy 26. Uppal N, Pappu A, Gowri VKS, et al., 2022, Cellulosic fibres-
Econ, 92: 181–192.
based epoxy composites: From bioresources to a circular
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.005 economy. Ind Crops Prod, 182: 114895.
16. Budzinski M, Bezama A, Thran D, 2020, Estimating the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114895
potentials for reducing the impacts on climate change 27. Eqbalpour M, Andooz A, Kowsari E, et al., 2023, A
by increasing the cascade use and extending the lifetime comprehensive review on how ionic liquids enhance the
of wood products in Germany. Resour Conserv Recycl X, pyrolysis of cellulose, lignin, and lignocellulose toward a
6: 100034.
circular economy. WIREs Energy Environ, 1: e473.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100034
https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.473
17. Hurmekoski E, Kunttu J, Heinonen T, et al., 2023, Does 28. Beling RR, 2016, Brazilian Forestry and Timber Yearbook.
expanding wood use in construction and textile markets Santa Cruz do Sul: Editora Gazeta Santa Cruz.
contribute to climate change mitigation? Renew Sustain
Energy Rev, 174: 113152. 29. United Nations, 2021, Forest Products Annual Market
Review 2020-2021. Geneva: Food and Agriculture
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113152
Organization of the United Nations.
18. Blomsma F, Brennan G, 2017, The emergence of circular 30. Santana RC, De Barros NF, Leite HG, et al., 2008, Biomass
economy: A new framing around prolonging resource estimation of Brazilian eucalypt plantations. Rev Árvore,
productivity. J Ind Ecol, 21: 603–614. 32: 697–706.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622008000400011
19. Nobre AG, Martínez JAE, Florêncio O, 2021, Mineral 31. Schumacher MV, Viera M, 2016, Silvicultura do Eucalipto
nanotechnology in circular economy. In: Iano Y, Saotome O, no Brasil. Santa Maria: Editora da Universidade Federal de
Kemper G, et al., editors. Smart Innovation, Systems and Santa Maria.
Technologies. Switzerland, Cham: Springer. p. 342–348.
32. Scott DF, Lesch W, 1997, Streamflow responses to
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75680-2_26
afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus patula and
20. Araújo CKD, Salvador R, Piekarski CM, et al., 2019, Circular to felling in the Mokobulaan experimental catchments,
economy practices on wood panels: A bibliographic analysis. South Africa. J Hydrol, 199: 360–377.
Sustainability, 11: 1057.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03336-7
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041057
33. Zhang D, Zhang J, Yang W, et al., 2012, Effects of afforestation
21. Shogren R, Wood D, Orts W, et al., 2019, Plant-based with Eucalyptus grandis on soil physicochemical and
materials and transitioning to a circular economy. Sustain microbiological properties. Soil Res, 50: 167–176.
Prod Consum, 19: 194–215.
https://doi.org/10.1071/SR11104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.04.007
34. Da Silva JRV, Alves PLC, Toledo REB, 2012, Weed control
22. Salem KS, Naithani V, Jameel H, et al., 2020, Lignocellulosic strip influences the initial growth of Eucalyptus grandis. Acta
Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023) 8 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1000

