Page 88 - MSAM-2-3
P. 88

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                       Functional graded and hybrid TPMS lattices




                         A                        B































            Figure 6. (A) As-designed hybrid triply periodic minimal surfaces lattices. (B) As-manufactured hybrid triply periodic minimal surfaces lattices.

                    [6]
            at 250 µm . With a very high accuracy of up to 14 µm layer   A30 samples were labeled sequentially from 1 to 4, as shown
            thickness and the rubber-like nature of printed material,   in Figure 6B, where the as-designed models are illustrated
            Stratasys J750 has been utilized to explore compliant   in  Figure  6A. To explore the influence by combining
                 [28]
            design . The printer is compatible with multiple types of   different types of TPMS lattices, uniaxial compression tests
            polymer materials, including VeroMagentaV (VMV) and   were conducted by utilizing the Shimadzu universal testing
            Agilus30. As a rigid material, VMV can be mixed with the   machine. The 2  mm/min load rate was adopted with a
            softer Agilus30 so that a material with a different shore-  50 kN load cell. Each design was tested with three samples
                                 [29]
            hardness can be produced .                         to ensure the repeatability.
              In this work, the A30, which has a shore hardness of 30,   Figure 7 shows the compressive response for different
            and A40, which has a shore hardness of 40, were utilized   hybrid lattice samples. According to the force-displacement
            as the base materials. Two different unit cells, which are   curves, two slope changes, which indicate the beginning of
            solid-network-based primitive and solid-network-based   post-yielding and the densification, were clearly observed
            gyroid, are radially hybrid as illustrated in  Figure  1E.   for all cases. Thus, the deformation of both types of
            The selection of unit cells is based on their deformation   hybrid lattices was divided into three stages: (1) a nearly
            behavior, where the solid-network-based gyroid exhibits   linear stage where the force increases with the increase
            bending-dominated behavior and the solid-network-based   of  displacement  under  an  approximately  linear  relation;
            primitive exhibits stretch-dominated behavior as reported   (2) a continual deformation stage with a hardening under
                        [23]
            in the literature . The dimension of the hybrid lattice was   different degree; and (3) densification stage. As shown in
            set to be 50 mm in width, length, and height. The size of the   Figure 7A and B, the gyroid-primitive design can increase
            unit cell was set to be 10 mm. Two different hybridization   the slope of the force-displacement curve when compared
            schemes with the same overall relative densities were   to the primitive-gyroid design. As a result, the higher
            adopted: (i) Radial hybrid lattice gyroid-primitive where   strength at stage 2 can be achieved by the gyroid-primitive
            gyroid unit cells located in the inner region and primitive   lattices, where the drop of force at the transition between
            located in the outer region; and (ii) radial hybrid lattices   stage 1 and stage 2 observed in primitive-gyroid can be
            primitive-gyroid where primitive unit cells located in   mitigated. The strengthening effect obtained in primitive-
            the inner region and gyroid located in the outer region.   gyroid lattices indicates that allocating the stretch-
            The as-manufactured gyroid-primitive  A40, primitive-  dominated lattices on the side of the structure to withstand
            gyroid A40, gyroid-primitive A30, and primitive-gyroid   higher stress and the bending-dominated lattices on the


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         7                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1753
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93