Page 93 - MSAM-2-3
P. 93

Materials Science in

                                                                  Additive Manufacturing



                                        ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
                                        Additive manufacturing: Application and

                                        validation of machine learning-based
                                        process-structure-property linkages in Ti-6Al-4V



                                        Xi Gong, Willem Groeneveld-Meijer, and Guha Manogharan*

                                        Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, PA, 16801, USA



                                        Abstract

                                        In the field of metal additive manufacturing (AM), various processes and heat
                                        treatments can yield unique grain morphologies, thereby influencing material
                                        properties and machining behavior. In this study, a novel workflow using a machine
                                        learning-based approach that combines statistical descriptors of textured AM-process
                                        induced microstructure, cutting force model (as a material response), and a data-mining
                                        method is established. It is proven to be a valid method for creating process-structure-
                                        property linkages for metal AM. This study focuses on two highly varied metal AM
                                        processes: Powder bed fusion (PBF, e.g., laser PBF and electron beam PBF) and directed
                                        energy deposition (DED, e.g., wire-fed plasma-directed energy deposition). The study
                                        also accounted for the effects of post-AM heat treatment and build orientation. It was
                                        found that the accuracy of material behavior predictions is highly correlated with AM
                                        processing conditions, building orientations, and machining conditions. Specifically,
            *Corresponding author:      while initially applying PBF training data to DED samples resulted in a 15% root mean
            Guha Manogharan             square prediction error, this error was subsequently reduced to <1% through cross-
            (gum53@psu.edu)
                                        training using combined microstructure training data sets. This discrepancy could be
            Citation: Gong X, Groeneveld-  attributed to the significantly different thermal cycling conditions in L-PBF and DED,
            Meijer W, Manogharan G, 2023,   which resulted in highly varied textured microstructures. Residual stresses generated
            Additive manufacturing: Application
            and validation of machine learning-  during AM processing and the selection of machining parameters exert the highest
            based process-structure-property   impact on the machining behavior. The implications of these findings extend to the
            linkages in Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Add   use of statistically descriptive microstructures for various AM processing conditions
            Manuf, 2(3): 0999.
            https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.0999   and build orientations in computational methods and other machining learning
                                        approaches.
            Received: May 25, 2023
            Accepted: September 24, 2023
                                        Keywords: Additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Process-structure-property
            Published Online: September 29,   linkage; Ti-6Al-4V
            2023
            Copyright: © 2023 Author(s).
            This is an Open-Access article
            distributed under the terms of the
            Creative Commons Attribution   1. Introduction
            License, permitting distribution,
            and reproduction in any medium,   Metal additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offer an economical means of
            provided the original work is   producing highly complex and customized parts with efficient material utilization,
            properly cited.             particularly suitable for low-volume production . Two major classes of AM processes are
                                                                             [1]
            Publisher’s Note: AccScience   employed for titanium alloys: powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition
            Publishing remains neutral with   (DED).  Within a  given  part (based on  build orientation),  the microstructure  and
            regard to jurisdictional claims in
            published maps and institutional   mechanical properties exhibit unique characteristics, strongly influenced by the chosen
            affiliations.               AM process, processing conditions, and subsequent post-AM treatments. In laser PBF,

            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         1                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.0999
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98