Page 24 - MSAM-2-4

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Emerging 3D-printed zeolitic gas adsorbents

16. Williams JL, 2001, Monolith structures, materials, properties 29. Hubesch R, Mazur M, Föger K, et al., 2021, Zeolites
and uses. Catal Today, 69: 3–9. on 3D-printed open metal framework structure: Metal
migration into zeolite promoted catalytic cracking of
17. Halevi O, Chen TY, Lee PS, et al., 2020, Nuclear wastewater
decontamination by 3D-printed hierarchical zeolite endothermic fuels for flight vehicles. Chem Commun,
monoliths. RSC Adv, 10: 5766–5776. 57: 9586–9589.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC04246G
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA09967K
30. Low ZX, Chua YT, Ray BM, et al., 2017, Perspective on
18. Hawaldar NH, 2018, Slurry Preparation of Zeolite and
Metal-organic Framework for Extrusion Based 3D-printing. 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to
United States: Purdue University. Available from: https:// related unconventional fabrication techniques. J Membr Sci,
docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI10809712 [Last 523: 596–613.
accessed 2023 Sep 21]. 31. Lawson S, Snarzyk M, Hanify D, et al., 2020, Development
of 3D-printed polymer-MOF monoliths for CO adsorption.
19. Chua CK, Leong KF, 2016, 3D Printing and Additive 2
Manufacturing. Singapore: World Scientific. Ind Eng Chem Res, 59: 7151–7160.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05445
https://doi.org/10.1142/10200
32. Zhakeyev A, Wang P, Zhang L, et al., 2017, Additive
20. Comroe ML, Kolasinski KW, Saha D, 2022, Direct ink 3D
printing of porous carbon monoliths for gas separations. manufacturing: Unlocking the evolution of energy materials.
Molecules, 27: 5653. Adv Sci, 4: 1700187.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700187
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175653
33. Li X, Rezaei F, Rownaghi AA, 2019, Methanol-to-olefin
21. Middelkoop V, Coenen K, Schalck J, et al., 2019, 3D printed
versus spherical adsorbents for gas sweetening. Chem Eng J, conversion on 3D-printed ZSM-5 monolith catalysts:
357: 309–319. Effects of metal doping, mesoporosity and acid strength.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 276: 1–12.
22. Toh WQ, Wang P, Tan X, et al., 2016, Microstructure and
wear properties of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V parts: 34. Wright PA, Pearce GM, (eds), 2010, Structural chemistry of
A comparison study against as-cast form. Metals, 6: 284. zeolites. In: Zeolites and Catalysis. Germany: Wiley-VCH,
Federal Republic of Germany, p.171–207.
https://doi.org/10.3390/met6110284
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527630295.ch7
23. Zhu ZG, Nguyen QB, Ng FL, et al., 2018, Hierarchical
microstructure and strengthening mechanisms of a 35. Derbe T, Temesgen S, Bitew M, 2021, A short review on
CoCrFeNiMn high entropy alloy additively manufactured synthesis, characterization, and applications of zeolites. Adv
by selective laser melting. Scr Mater, 154: 20–24. Mater Sci Eng, 2021: 6637898.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6637898
24. Hon KKB, Li L, Hutchings IM, 2008, Direct writing
technology-advances and developments. CIRP Ann Manuf 36. Emami Moghaddam SA, Harun R, Mokhtar MN, et al., 2018,
Technol, 57: 601–620. Potential of zeolite and algae in biomass immobilization.
Biomed Res Int, 2018: 6563196.
25. Thakkar H, Eastman S, Al-Naddaf Q, et al., 2017, 3D-printed
metal-organic framework monoliths for gas adsorption https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6563196
processes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9: 35908–35916.
37. Weckhuysen BM, 2016, Zeolites shine bright. Nat Mater,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b11626 15: 933–934.
26. Yuan S, Bai J, Chua CK, et al., 2016, Material evaluation and https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4730
process optimization of CNT-coated polymer powders for 38. Jha B, Singh DN, (eds), 2016, Basics of zeolites. In: Fly
selective laser sintering. Polymers (Basel), 8: 370.
Ash Zeolites: Innovations, Applications, and Directions.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8100370 Singapore, Berlin: Springer Singapore, p.5–31.
27. Wang S, Bai P, Sun M, et al., 2019, Fabricating mechanically https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1404-8_2
robust binder-free structured zeolites by 3D printing 39. Baerlocher C, McCusker LB, Olson DH, (eds), 2007,
coupled with zeolite soldering: A superior configuration for Introduction and explanatory notes. In: Atlas of Zeolite
CO capture. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6: 1901317.
th
2 Framework Types. 6 ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V,
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201901317 p.3–11. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/article/pii/B9780444530646501870 [Last accessed
28. Nadagouda MN, Ginn M, Rastogi V, 2020, A review of 3D
printing techniques for environmental applications. Curr on 2023 Sep 21].
Opin Chem Eng, 28: 173–178. 40. Król M, 2020, Natural vs. synthetic zeolites. Crystals, 10: 622.

Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023) 18 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1880