Page 27 - MSAM-2-4

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Emerging 3D-printed zeolitic gas adsorbents

https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/491396 binder system. Mater Des, 134: 331–341.
93. Asgar Pour Z, Sebakhy KO, 2022, A review on the effects 106. Yang Y, Zhou Z, Chu X, et al., 2022, 3D-printed zeolite with
of organic structure-directing agents on the hydrothermal combined structure for xylene isomerization. Mater Des,
synthesis and physicochemical properties of zeolites. 219: 110744.
Chemistry, 4: 431–446. 107. Shukrun Farrell E, Schilt Y, Moshkovitz MY, et al., 2020, 3D
94. Lawson S, Newport K, Al-Naddaf Q, et al., 2021, Binderless printing of ordered mesoporous silica complex structures.
zeolite monoliths production with sacrificial biopolymers. Nano Lett, 20: 6598–6605.
Chem Eng J, 407: 128011. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02364
95. Zhang H, Wang P, Zhang H, et al., 2020, Structured zeolite 108. Bastani D, Esmaeili N, Asadollahi M, 2013, Polymeric
monoliths with ultrathin framework for fast CO adsorption mixed matrix membranes containing zeolites as a filler
2
enabled by 3D printing. Ind Eng Chem Res, 59: 8223–8229. for gas separation applications: A review. J Ind Eng Chem,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b07060 19: 375–393.
96. Couck S, Lefevere J, Mullens S, et al., 2017, CO , CH and 109. Thakkar H, Lawson S, Rownaghi AA, et al., 2018,
4
2
N separation with a 3DFD-printed ZSM-5 monolith. Chem Development of 3D-printed polymer-zeolite composite
2
Eng J, 308: 719–726. monoliths for gas separation. Chem Eng J, 348: 109–116.
97. Wang S, Bai P, Wei Y, et al., 2019, Three-dimensional-printed 110. Wudy K, Hinze M, Ranft F, et al., 2017, Selective laser
core-shell structured MFI-type zeolite monoliths for volatile sintering of zeolite filled polypropylene composites:
organic compound capture under humid conditions. ACS Processing and properties of bulk adsorbents. J Mater
Appl Mater Interfaces, 11: 38955–38963. Process Tech, 246: 136–143.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13819 111. Zhang Y, Josien L, Salomon JP, et al., 2021,
Photopolymerization of zeolite/polymer-based composites:
98. Merilaita N, Vastamäki T, Ismailov A, et al., 2021, Toward 3D and 4D printing applications. ACS Appl Polym
Stereolithography as a manufacturing method for a Mater, 3: 400–409.
hierarchically porous ZSM-5 zeolite structure with
adsorption capabilities. Ceram Int, 47: 10742–10748. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c01170
99. Hawaldar N, Park HY, Jung YG, et al., 2018, Extrusion-based 112. Liu J, He J, Wang L, et al., 2016, NiO-PTA supported on
3D printing of molecular sieve zeolite for gas adsorption ZIF-8 as a highly effective catalyst for hydrocracking of
applications. Mater Sci Technol, 33–40. Jatropha oil. Sci Rep, 6: 23667.

https://doi.org/10.7449/2018mst/2018/mst_2018_33_40 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23667
100. Lawson S, Adebayo B, Robinson C, et al., 2020, The effects of 113. Huang H, Zhang W, Liu D, et al., 2011, Effect of temperature
cell density and intrinsic porosity on structural properties on gas adsorption and separation in ZIF-8: A combined
and adsorption kinetics in 3D-printed zeolite monoliths. experimental and molecular simulation study. Chem Eng
Chem Eng Sci, 218: 115564. Sci, 66: 6297–6305.
101. Couck S, Cousin-Saint-Remi J, Van der Perre S, et al., 114. Evans KA, Kennedy ZC, Arey BW, et al., 2018, Chemically
2018, 3D-printed SAPO-34 monoliths for gas separation. active, porous 3D-printed thermoplastic composites. ACS
Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 255: 185–191. Appl Mater Interfaces, 10: 15112–15121.
102. Feilden E, Blanca EGT, Giuliani F, et al., 2016, Robocasting https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17565
of structural ceramic parts with hydrogel inks. J Eur Ceram 115. Bible M, Sefa M, Fedchak JA, et al., 2018, 3D-printed
Soc, 36: 2525–2533. acrylonitrile butadiene styrene-metal organic framework
103. Liu G, Guo J, Meng F, et al., 2014, Effects of colloidal silica composite materials and their gas storage properties. 3D
binder on catalytic activity and adhesion of HZSM-5 Print Addit Manuf, 5: 63–72.
coatings for structured reactors. Chin J Chem Eng, https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2017.0067
22: 875–881.
116. Lefevere J, Claessens B, Mullens S, et al., 2019, 3D-printed
104. Lee KY, Lee HK, Ihm SK, 2010, Influence of catalyst binders zeolitic imidazolate framework structures for adsorptive
on the acidity and catalytic performance of HZSM-5 separations. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2: 4991–4999.
zeolites for methanol-to-propylene (MTP) process: Single
and binary binder system. Top Catal, 53: 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00934
117. Magzoub F, Li X, Lawson S, et al., 2020, 3D-printed
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-009-9412-0
HZSM-5 and 3D-HZM5@SAPO-34 structured monoliths
105. Lefevere J, Protasova L, Mullens S, et al., 2017, 3D-printing with controlled acidity and porosity for conversion of
of hierarchical porous ZSM-5: The importance of the methanol to dimethyl either. Fuel, 280: 118628.

Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023) 21 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1880