Page 26 - MSAM-2-4

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Emerging 3D-printed zeolitic gas adsorbents

Eng J, 162: 415–423. of porous cordierite honeycomb ceramic. Ceram Int,
45: 15230–15236.
66. Fedosov DA, Smirnov AV, Knyazeva EE, et al., 2011, Zeolite
membranes: Synthesis, properties, and application. Pet 80. Solís Pinargote NW, Smirnov A, Peretyagin N, et al., 2020,
Chem, 51: 657–667. Direct ink writing technology (3D printing) of graphene-based
ceramic nanocomposites: A review. Nanomater, 10: 1300.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544111080032
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071300
67. Mette B, Kerskes H, Drück H, et al., 2014, Experimental
and numerical investigations on the water vapor adsorption 81. Crump SS, 1992, Apparatus and Method for Creating Three-
isotherms and kinetics of binderless zeolite 13X. Int J Heat dimensional Objects. United States Patent, Application,
Mass Transf, 71: 555–561. No. 5,121,329, Filed. Available from: https://patents.google.
com/patent/US5121329/en [Last accessed on 2023 Sep 21].
68. Silva JAC, Schumann K, Rodrigues AE, 2012, Sorption and
kinetics of CO and CH in binderless beads of 13X zeolite. 82. Lakhdar Y, Tuck C, Binner J, et al., 2021, Additive
2
4
Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 158: 219–228. manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials. Prog Mater
Sci, 116: 100736.
69. Scheffler M, Scheffler F, 2006, Zeolite coatings on porous
monoliths. Adv Sci Technol, 45: 1260–1267. 83. Smay JE, Gratson GM, Shepherd RF, et al., 2002, Directed
colloidal assembly of 3D periodic structures. Adv Mater,
70. Li L, Xue B, Chen J, et al., 2005, Direct synthesis of zeolite
coatings on cordierite supports by in situ hydrothermal 14: 1279–1283.
method. Appl Catal A Gen, 292: 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(20020916)14:18<1279::AID-
ADMA1279>3.0.CO;2-A
71. Aimen Isa M, Hanif Halim M, Chew TL, et al., 2020,
Formation of NaY zeolite membrane: Influence of 84. Schlordt T, Schwanke S, Keppner F, et al., 2013, Robocasting
intermediate layer and its characterization. IOP Conf Ser of alumina hollow filament lattice structures. J Eur Ceram
Mater Sci Eng, 736: 052019. Soc, 33: 3243–3248.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/736/5/052019 85. Ziaee M, Crane NB, 2019, Binder jetting: A review of
process, materials, and methods. Addit Manuf, 28: 781–801.
72. Stuecker JN, Miller JE, Ferrizz RE, et al., 2004, Advanced
support structures for enhanced catalytic activity. Ind Eng 86. Mirzababaei S, Pasebani S, 2019, A review on binder jet
Chem Res, 43: 51–55. additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. J Manuf
Mater Process, 3: 82.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie030291v
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3030082
73. Liu J, Huo W, Ren B, et al., 2018, A novel approach to
fabricate porous alumina ceramics with excellent properties 87. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A, 2013, Bone tissue
via pore-forming agent combined with sol impregnation engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today, 16: 496–504.
technique. Ceram Int, 44: 16751–16757.
88. Chung H, Das S, 2008, Functionally graded Nylon-11/silica
74. Hull CW, 1984, Apparatus for Production of Three- nanocomposites produced by selective laser sintering. Mater
dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. United States Sci Eng A, 487: 251–257.
Patent, Application, No. 638905, Filed. Avialable from: 89. Zhang G, Chen H, Yang S, et al., 2018, Frozen slurry-
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-6027324-A based laminated object manufacturing to fabricate porous
[Last accessed on 2023 Sep 21].
ceramic with oriented lamellar structure. J Eur Ceram Soc,
75. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma QP, et al., 2021, A review of vat 38: 4014–4019.
photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications, 90. Van Noyen J, De Wilde A, Schroeven M, et al., 2012,
challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers Ceramic processing techniques for catalyst design:
(Basel), 13: 598.
Formation, properties, and catalytic example of ZSM-5 on
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040598 3-dimensional fiber deposition support structures. Int J Appl
Ceram Technol, 9: 902–910.
76. Nohut S, Schwentenwein M, 2022, Vat photopolymerization
additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02781.x
A review. J Manuf Mater Process, 6: 17.
91. Thakkar H, Eastman S, Hajari A, et al., 2016, 3D-printed
77. Zhang F, Li Z, Xu M, et al., 2022, A review of 3D printed zeolite monoliths for CO removal from enclosed
2
porous ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc, 42: 3351–3373. environments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8: 27753–27761.
78. Shahzad A, Lazoglu I, 2021, Direct ink writing (DIW) of https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09647
structural and functional ceramics: Recent achievements 92. Liu X, He J, Li R, 2012, High-pressure hydrogen adsorption
and future challenges. Compos B Eng, 225: 109249.
in the zeolites: A grand canonical Monte Carlo study. ISRN
79. Pan Y, Zhu P, Wang R, et al., 2019, Direct ink writing Renew Energy, 2012: 491396.

Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023) 20 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1880