Page 38 - MSAM-4-1
P. 38

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             TPMS for perfect sound absorption




                                                               Table 8. Sound absorption characteristics of uniform
                                                               I‑Wrapped Package (IWP) and multicavity‑IWP structures
                                                               Specimen    Thickness,   Frequency   Absorption   λ peak /T
                                                                            T (mm)  at first peak,   at first
                                                                                      f 1  (Hz)  peak, α 1
                                                               IWP-6 mm        6        -        -       -
                                                               IWP-12 mm      12      5480      0.574   5.28
                                                               IWP-18 mm      18      3860      0.619   5.00
                                                               IWP-24 mm      24      2670      0.750   5.42
                                                               IWP-30 mm      30      1890      0.821   6.13
                                                               Multicavity-IWP  30    2150      0.944   5.39


                                                               peak is not related to the type of TPMS structure, and the
                                                               bandgap variation depends on the thickness of the TPMS
            Figure  10. Sound absorption curves of primitive and multicavity-  structures.
            primitive structures
                                                               3.4. Sound absorption characteristics of IWP and
              Five peaks are also visible on the spectrum of the   multicavity-IWP structures
            multicavity-primitive structure. The first four peaks at   The sound absorption coefficient curves of IWP and
            frequencies of 2090, 2570, 3330, and 4590 Hz correspond   multicavity-IWP are displayed in  Figure  12, and the
            to the four individual absorption peaks for each cavity with   resonance peak analysis is listed in Table 8. The resonance
            Primitive-12  mm, Primitive-18  mm, Primitive-24  mm,   peaks of IWP-12 mm, IWP-18 mm, IWP-24 mm, and IWP-
            and-30 mm; the fifth peak (5870 Hz) corresponds to the   30 mm are 5480, 3860, 2670, and 1890 Hz, respectively. The
            second individual absorption peak of Primitive-30  mm.   α  of IWP-12 mm, IWP-18 mm, IWP-24 mm, and IWP-
                                                                1
            In addition, the primitive structure with a single cavity   30  mm are 0.574, 0.619, 0.750, and 0.821, respectively.
            primarily exhibits semi-absorption at its first peak. The five   These results indicate that the resonance peak frequency
            resonance peaks of the multicavity-primitive structure are   of the IWP structure shifts toward lower frequencies as
            all above 0.75, and the second peak achieves 100% sound   the thickness increases; the sound absorption coefficient
            absorption. It is demonstrated that the multicavity design   of the resonance peak of the IWP structure is enhanced as
            for the primitive structure can result in more absorption   the thickness increases. The sound absorption coefficient
            peaks and enhance sound absorption. However, the sound   of the IWP structure at the first resonance peak is higher
            absorption coefficient at the third and fourth peaks of the   than that of the gyroid and primitive structures with the
            multicavity-primitive structure is lower than that of the   same thickness. The QWRF of the IWP structures with
            multicavity-gyroid structure.                      different thicknesses are all higher than the theoretical
                                                               QWRF.
              The acoustic bandgap of the primitive structure was
            analyzed through the Bloch wave vector and frequency   Five peaks are visible on the spectrum of the
            spectrum (Figure  11). The primitive structure with a   multicavity-IWP structure; the first four peaks (2150,
            thickness of 18 mm exhibits a wide flat band, which is a   2660, 3450, and 4850  Hz) correspond to the four
            Bragg bandgap between 3330 and 4330 Hz (Figure 11C)   individual absorption peaks for each cavity with IWP-
            and corresponds to the first resonance peak (f  = 4150 Hz;   12 mm, IWP-18 mm, IWP-24 mm, and IWP-30 mm; the
                                                1
            α = 0.505) of Primitive-18  mm. The acoustic bandgap   fifth peak (5900 Hz) corresponds to the second individual
             1
            of Primitive-24  mm is between 2620 and 3240  Hz,   absorption peak (6130 Hz) of IWP-30 mm. The resonance
            corresponding to the first resonance peak (f = 2840 Hz;   of multicavity-IWP structure frequencies shifts due to inter-
                                                1
            α = 0.524) of Primitive-24  mm. There is a sharp peak   resonator interactions, and the frequencies of peaks of the
             1
            characteristic in Primitive-12  mm, Primitive-18  mm,   multicavity-IWP shift to the lower frequencies, except for
            Primitive-24  mm, and Primitive-30  mm, and the    the first peak. This indicates that the five resonance peaks
            frequency corresponding to the attenuation sharp peak is   of the multicavity-IWP are above 0.94, and the third peak
            4340, 4860, 4370, and 4350 Hz, respectively; the frequency   achieves 100% sound absorption.
            of these attenuation sharp peaks is consistent with the   The acoustic bandgap of the IWP structure was
            gyroid structures. It is illustrated that the sharp attenuation   analyzed through the Bloch wave vector and frequency



            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         11                             doi: 10.36922/msam.5737
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43