Page 150 - MSAM-4-2
P. 150

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                    Bi-modal powder spreading behavior of ceramics



                                                               and printing parameters were kept constant to isolate the
                                                               effect of powder properties themselves. Subsequently, the
                                                               powder bed density was measured using a density cup, and
                                                               the relative density of the green parts was evaluated based
                                                               on the printed samples. Some of the major findings from
                                                               this study are given below:
                                                               (i)  Smaller powders (1 µm and 5 µm) exhibited
                                                                  markedly improved flow characteristics when used
                                                                  at elevated temperatures, reducing moisture-induced
                                                                  agglomeration. On the other hand, coarser powders
                                                                  (10 µm and 20 µm) displayed excellent flowability
                                                                  across both room and higher temperatures.
                                                               (ii)  Discrete element simulations and experiments
                                                                  revealed that, for the bimodal powder (5 µm and
                                                                  20 µm), finer particles settled at the start of the
                                                                  spreading direction. In comparison, larger particles
                                                                  migrated toward the trailing edge, inducing a spatial
                                                                  gradient in powder size distribution.
                                                               (iii) The powder bed packing density also dropped in the
            Figure 7. Comparison of packing density and part relative density along   spreading direction. Particularly, regions dominated
            the X- and Y-axes at different axis positions. Packing density and part   by smaller particles showed denser packing, whereas
            relative density along the X-axis show a decreasing trend in the spreading
            direction, indicating non-uniform powder spreading and part density  the larger particle-dominated regions showed lower
                                                                  packing density, resulting in a packing density gradient
            the amount of powder ejection was larger than the binder   along the spreading direction.
            residue  after  curing.  Previous  studies  also  showed  that   (iv)  Local fluctuations in powder bed packing density
            smaller powders lead to higher green density. 7,81,82  were reflected in spatial variations of green part
                                                                  density, mirroring the same pattern of packing density
              These results demonstrate that PSD directly affects the   observed in the powder bed.
            green part properties. Finer particles contribute to higher
            local packing density and, thus, yield higher relative density   These findings highlight the critical influence of
            in the printed part, while coarser regions exhibit lower   PSD, temperature, flow behavior, and powder spreading
            density. This spatial variation can be strategically used to   behavior on powder bed uniformity, packing density, and
            design parts with location-specific properties. This graded   green  part density. The  observed  preferential  deposition
            density can potentially optimize mechanical properties, for   of smaller powders, coupled with differential packing
            instance, densifying certain regions for superior strength   densities, signifies the importance of addressing spatial
            while maintaining lower density in others for lightweight   inhomogeneities in powder bed-based AM. Furthermore,
            design or thermal management.                      this phenomenon opens up the possibility of fabricating
                                                               parts with functionally graded densities.
            4. Conclusion                                      Acknowledgments

            AM processing physics in powder bed processes like BJT
            are readily affected by the powder bed spreading process   The authors would like to acknowledge Denka Chemicals
            and characteristics. This study systematically investigated   GmbH, Tokyo, Japan, for their support in supplying all the
            the flowability of unimodal alumina powders (1 µm, 5 µm,   powders used in this study.
            10 µm, and 20 µm) to choose a bimodal powder that shows   Funding
            the highest packing density. The 5 µm and 20 µm powders
            with a 4:1 volume-to-percentage ratio were chosen based   This work was partially supported by NSF CMMI Award
            on the DEM simulation to formulate the bimodal powder.   #1944120 and partially funded by Applied Research Laboratory,
            This bimodal powder was used for further powder bed   Penn State, through the Walker Student Fellowship.
            formation and printing experiments. Powder samples were
            collected from a powder bed deposited in a BJT machine   Conflict of interest
            that uses an overhead feed system and a roller-based   Guha Manogharan serves as the Editorial Board Member
            powder spreading mechanism, where all the spreading   of the journal, but was not in any way involved in the


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         11                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM02510016
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155