Page 151 - MSAM-4-2
P. 151

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                    Bi-modal powder spreading behavior of ceramics



            editorial and peer-review process conducted for this paper,   [Last accessed on 2025 Feb 07].
            directly or indirectly. Other authors declare they have no   6.   Shahed KS, Manogharan G. Powder-binder interaction
            competing interests.                                  in binder jetting process: A  simulation study on bimodal
                                                                  powders. In:  Additive Manufacturing; Advanced Materials
            Author contributions                                  Manufacturing;  Biomanufacturing;  Life  Cycle  Engineering.
            Conceptualization:  Kazi  Safowan  Shahed,  Guha      Vol.  1. New  York City: American Society of Mechanical
                                                                  Engineers; 2023.
               Manogharan
            Formal analysis: Kazi Safowan Shahed, Guha Manogharan     doi: 10.1115/MSEC2023-104366
            Funding Acquisition:  Matthew Lear, Jeremy Schreiber,   7.   Clares AP, Gao Y, Stebbins R, Van Duin ACT, Manogharan G.
               Guha Manogharan                                    Increasing density and mechanical performance of binder
            Investigation: Kazi Safowan Shahed, Willem Groeneveld–  jetting processing through bimodal particle size distribution.
               Meijer                                             Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(3):20.
            Methodology: Kazi Safowan Shahed, Willem Groeneveld–     doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i3.20
               Meijer, Guha Manogharan                         8.   Shrestha S, Manogharan G. Optimization of binder jetting
            Writing – original draft:  Kazi  Safowan  Shahed,  Guha   using taguchi method. JOM. 2017;69(3):491-497.
               Manogharan
            Writing – review & editing: Matthew Lear, Jeremy Schreiber,      doi: 10.1007/S11837-016-2231-4/TABLES/4
               Guha Manogharan                                 9.   Mostafaei A, Elliott AM, Barnes JE,  et  al. Binder jet
                                                                  3D printing-Process parameters, materials, properties,
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            modeling, and challenges. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;119:100707.

            Not applicable                                        doi: 10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2020.100707
                                                               10.  Sarila V, Koneru HP, Pyatla S, Cheepu M, Kantumunchu VC,
            Consent for publication                               Ramachandran D. An overview on 3D printing of ceramics

            Not applicable                                        using binder jetting process. Eng Proc. 2024;61(1):44.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/ENGPROC2024061044
            Availability of data
                                                               11.  Huang S, Ye C, Zhao H, Fan Z. Additive manufacturing
            Data will be made available on reasonable request.    of thin alumina ceramic cores using binder-jetting.  Addit
                                                                  Manuf. 2019;29:100802.
            References                                            doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.100802

            1.   Lv X, Ye F, Cheng L, Fan S, Liu Y. Binder jetting of ceramics:   12.  Du W, Ren X, Pei Z, Ma C. Ceramic binder jetting additive
               Powders, binders, printing parameters, equipment, and   manufacturing: A literature review on density. J Manuf Sci
               post-treatment. Ceram Int. 2019;45(10):12609-12624.
                                                                  Eng Trans ASME. 2020;142(4):1074276.
               doi: 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2019.04.012                doi: 10.1115/1.4046248/1074276
            2.   Zocca A, Colombo P, Gomes CM, Günster J. Additive   13.  Clares AP, Manogharan G. Discrete-element simulation
               manufacturing of ceramics: Issues, potentialities, and   of powder spreading process in binder jetting, and
               opportunities. J Am Ceram Soc. 2015;98(7):1983-2001.  the  effects  of  powder  size.  In:  Proceedings of the ASME
                                                                         th
               doi: 10.1111/JACE.13700                            2021  16   International Manufacturing Science and
                                                                  Engineering Conference, MSEC 2021; 2021. p. 1.
            3.   Du W, Singh M, Singh D. Binder jetting additive
               manufacturing of silicon carbide ceramics: Development of      doi: 10.1115/MSEC2021-63351
               bimodal powder feedstocks by modeling and experimental   14.  Zegzulka J, Gelnar D, Jezerska L, Prokes R, Rozbroj J.
               methods. Ceram Int. 2020;46(12):19701-19707.       Characterization  and  flowability  methods  for  metal
               doi: 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2020.04.098                powders. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21004.
            4.   Jodati H, Yılmaz B, Evis Z. A review of bioceramic porous      doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77974-3
               scaffolds for hard tissue applications: Effects of structural   15.  Haferkamp L, Haudenschild L, Spierings A, et al. The
               features. Ceram Int. 2020;46(10):15725-15739.      influence of particle shape, powder flowability, and powder
               doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.192                layer density on part density in laser powder bed fusion.
                                                                  Metals (Basel). 2021;11(3):418.
            5.   ISO/ASTM  52900:2015(en),  Additive Manufacturing-
               General Principles-Terminology. Available from: https://     doi: 10.3390/met11030418
               www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:   std:iso-astm:52900:ed-1:v1:en   16.  Garboczi EJ, Hrabe N. Particle shape and size analysis for


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         12                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM02510016
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156