Page 12 - TD-2-1
P. 12

Tumor Discovery                                                      RAGEs in oral squamous cell carcinoma



            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-005-0688-7

              Conceptualization: Palati Sinduja                8.   Taguchi A, Blood DC, del Toro G, et al., 2000, Blockade of
                                                                  RAGE-amphoterin signalling suppresses tumour growth
              Formal analysis: Palati Sinduja, Pratibha Ramani    and metastases. Nature, 405(6784): 354–360.
              Writing – original draft: Palati Sinduja            https://doi.org/10.1038/35012626
              Writing – review & editing: Pratibha Ramani, Saravanan   9.   Schmidt AM, Stern DM, 2001, Receptor for age (RAGE)
            Sekaran                                               is a gene within the major histocompatibility class  III
                                                                  region: Implications for host response mechanisms in
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            homeostasis and chronic disease. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr,
                                                                  6(3): 1151–1160.
              Not applicable.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.2741/schmidt
            Consent for publication                            10.  Choi J, Lee MK, Oh KH,  et al., 2011, Interaction effect
              Not applicable.                                     between the receptor for advanced glycation end products
                                                                  (RAGE) and high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) for the
            Availability of data                                  migration of a squamous cell carcinoma cell line. Tumori J,
                                                                  97(2): 196–202.
              Not applicable.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1177/030089161109700211
            References                                         11.  Kierdorf K, Fritz G, 2013, RAGE regulation and signaling in
                                                                  inflammation and beyond. J Leukoc Biol, 94(1): 55–68.
            1.   Scully C, Bagan J, 2009, Oral squamous cell carcinoma
               overview. Oral Oncol, 45(4–5): 301–308.            https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1012519
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.01.004  12.  Bergers G, Benjamin LE, 2003, Tumorigenesis and the
            2.   López-Graniel CM, de León DT, Meneses-García A, et al.,   angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer, 3(6): 401–410.
               2001,  Tumor  angiogenesis  as  a prognostic  factor  in  oral      https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1093
               cavity carcinomas. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 20(4): 463–468.
                                                               13.  Carmeliet P, 2005, VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis
            3.   Hofmann MA, Drury S, Fu C, et al., 1999, RAGE mediates a   in cancer. Oncology, 69 Suppl 3: 4–10.
               novel proinflammatory axis: A central cell surface receptor
               for S100/calgranulin polypeptides. Cell, 97(7): 889–901.      https://doi.org/10.1159/000088478
                                                               14.  Shweiki D, Itin A, Soffer D, et al., 1992, Vascular endothelial
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80801-6
                                                                  growth  factor  induced  by  hypoxia  may  mediate  hypoxia-
            4.   Hori O, Brett J, Slattery T,  et al., 1995, The receptor for   initiated angiogenesis. Nature, 359(6398): 843–845.
               advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cellular
               binding site for amphoterin mediation of neurite outgrowth      https://doi.org/10.1038/359843a0
               and co-expression of rage and amphoterin in the developing   15.  Ko SY, Ko HA, Shieh TM,  et al., 2014, Cell migration is
               nervous system. J Biol Chem, 270(43): 25752–25761.   regulated by AGE-RAGE interaction in human oral cancer
                                                                  cells in vitro. PLoS One, 9(10): e110542.
               https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.43.25752
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110542
            5.   Sugaya K, Fukagawa T, Matsumoto K,  et al., 1994, Three
               genes in the human MHC class III region near the junction   16.  Sasahira T, Kirita T, Bhawal UK, et al., 2007, Receptor for
               with the class II: Gene for receptor of advanced glycosylation   advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is important in
               end products, PBX2 homeobox gene and a notch homolog,   the prediction of recurrence in human oral squamous cell
               human counterpart of mouse mammary tumor gene int-3.   carcinoma. Histopathology, 51(2): 166–172.
               Genomics, 23(2): 408–419.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02739.x
               https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1517
                                                               17.  Hutajulu SH, Paramita DK, Santoso J, et al., 2018, Correlation
            6.   Vissing H, Aagaard L, Tommerup N, et al., 1994, Localization   between vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression
               of the human gene for advanced glycosylation end product-  and tumor location and invasion in patients with colorectal
               specific receptor (AGER) to chromosome 6p21.3. Genomics,   cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol, 9(6): 1099–1108.
               24(3): 606–608.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2018.07.01
               https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1676
                                                               18.  Kukreja I, Kapoor P, Deshmukh R, et al., 2013, VEGF and
            7.   Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Morcos M,  et  al., 2005,   CD 34: A  correlation between tumor angiogenesis and
               Understanding RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation   microvessel density-an immunohistochemical study. J Oral
               end products. J Mol Med (Berl), 83(11): 876–886.   Maxillofac Pathol, 17(3): 367–373.


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         6                           https://doi.org/10.36922/td.244
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17