Page 9 - TD-2-1
P. 9

Tumor Discovery                                                      RAGEs in oral squamous cell carcinoma








                 Limitations  Various tissue sources   were utilized, and the   number of cases was   reduced.  Not mentioned.  Not mentioned.  Note on the   environmental risks not   given.  (Cont’d...)








                 Inference  The mobility of   cells was found to   be increased when   both RAGE and   HMGB-1 is present.  Metastatic cases   expressed RAGE   mRNA at a high   level compared to   primary tumours  AGEs enhance cell   migration and also   reduce cell Viability.  RAGE antibodies   suppress cell   migration.  SNP rs1800652   was found to be   associated with risk   and progression of   oral cancers




                 P-value                        P = 0.0017                P = 0.01  P = 0.009  -








                 Observation  RAGE mRNA expression  (534 bp) was detected  At 2000 ng/ml  concentration of HMGB-1   the cell migration was   increased.  RAGE mRNA was   identified at various levels   in all oral carcinoma cell   lines and very weakly in   normal mucosa  RAGE antisense (S)   oligodeoxynucleotide-   treated LMF4 cells   migrating was significantly   lower (37 8 8.88 cells per   well.  After treatment   with antisense   S-oligodeoxynucleotide,   RAGE protein






                          transcriptase PCR  Boyden Chamber   Reverse transcriptase   Phosphorothioate (S)-   Oligodeoxynucleotide   Trypan Blue and   Real time PCR


                 Method  Reverse    Assay  PCR  Antisense   Assay  Western Blot  WST-1  Western Blot





                 Marker  RAGE  HMGB-1  RAGE                               AGE  RAGE      RAGE   pleomorphism



                 Control  -          _                                                   592
             Table 1. Details of the studies selected for the review



                 Case   10           10-Primary  10-Metastatic                           618



                 Cell   line         10

                 Number   of   samples  10  30                                           1210



                        Choi et al. [10]                                  Shun-Yao       Su et al. [19]

                 Study               Bhawal    et al. [21]                  Ko [15]



            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         3                           https://doi.org/10.36922/td.244
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14