Page 23 - TD-2-2
P. 23

Tumor Discovery                                             Practice and consideration of master protocol design



            fundamental problems in traditional trials have become   Supervision: Kang Li, Fengyu Sun, Yan Hou
            apparent and difficult to handle. Therefore, master   Writing – original draft: Xinwen Zhong, Jiali Song, Yuhong Lu
            protocols  should  be  prudently  used  when  they  are   Writing – review & editing: Jike Huang, Yipei Yu, Zhilin
            unavoidable  for  scientific  reasons.  It  is  unethical  and   Liu, Xuyuan Quan, Nana Chen
            inappropriate to consider master protocols as a vehicle
            that can simplify authorization or shorten review   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            timelines. The abuse of over-complex clinical trial designs   Not applicable.
            might result in unethical conduct of studies and weaken
            regulatory independence. In practice, master protocol   Consent for publication
            design and execution  require  careful  consideration of   Not applicable.
            time and resources for establishing trial infrastructure,
            predefining planning, and collaborating among different   Availability of data
            parties involved in the conduct to agree on trial details.
            Therefore, a master protocol should be carefully designed   Not applicable.
            and restricted to ensure trial subject safety, data integrity,   References
            or quality of trial conduct.
                                                               1.   FDA, 2022, Master Protocols: Efficient Clinical Trial
              Nevertheless, it has been argued that master protocol   Design Strategies to Expedite Development of Oncology
            trials could enhance clinical trial efficiency and reduce trial   Drugs and Biologics Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring,
            time and cost from a long-term perspective. First, master   Maryland: The United States Food and Drug Administration.
            protocols increase the benefits of patients in clinical trials   2.   FDA, 2019. COVID-19: Master Protocols Evaluating Drugs
            because these designs aim to treat patients with the most   and Biological Products for Treatment or Prevention
            rational therapy based on their characteristics. Besides,   Guidance for Industry. Silver Spring, Maryland: The United
            master protocols are long-term with trial infrastructure   States Food and Drug Administration.
            shared and common standardized operating procedures   3.   Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V, et al., 2015, Vemurafenib
            established between sub-studies. Therefore, they can   in multiple nonmelanoma cancers with BRAF V600
            collect a large amount of high-quality data, and recruit   mutations. N Engl J Med, 373(8): 726–736.
            and train clinical trial staff into secure roles. In addition,
            master protocols allow adding a new therapeutic discovery   4.   Demetri GD, Paz-Ares L, Farago AF, et al., 2018, Efficacy and
                                                                  safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive
            after a clinical trial begins, rather than launching a new   tumours: Pooled analysis of STARTRK-2, STARTRK-1, and
            clinical trial, and better adopting the new changes in   ALKA-372-001. Ann Oncol, 29: 175–175.
            clinical practices. Finally, as precision medicine develops,
            the therapies become more and more stringent to evaluate   5.   Renfro  LA,  Sargent  DJ,  2017,  Statistical  controversies  in
            rapidly, there is no alternative but to move forward with   clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other
            current research efforts to simultaneously test multi-  master protocols: A  review and examples.  Ann  Oncol,
                                                                  28(1): 34–43.
            treatments or multi-diseases within master protocols.
                                                               6.   Woodcock J, LaVange LM, 2017, Master protocols to study
            Acknowledgments                                       multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N Engl J Med,
                                                                  377(1): 62–70.
            None.
                                                               7.   Park JJ, Hsu G, Siden EG,  et al., 2020, An overview of
            Funding                                               precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians.
                                                                  CA Cancer J Clin, 70(2): 125–137.
            This work was supported by the National Natural Science
            Foundation (grant number: 82173615) of China.      8.   Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ,  et  al., 2009, I-SPY
                                                                  2: An adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting
            Conflict of interest                                  of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.  Clin Pharmacol  Ther,
                                                                  86(1): 97–100.
            The authors declare that they have no known competing   9.   Herbst RS, Gandara DR, Hirsch FR, et al., 2015, Lung master
            financial interests or personal relationships that could have   protocol  (Lung-MAP)-a  biomarker-driven protocol  for
            appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.  accelerating development of therapies for squamous cell lung
                                                                  cancer: SWOG S1400. Clin Cancer Res, 21(7): 1514–1524.
            Author contributions
                                                               10.  Hirakawa A, Asano J, Sato H, et al., 2018, Master protocol
            Conceptualization: Jiali Song, Zhiwei Rong, Fengyu Sun,   trials in oncology: Review and new trial designs. Contemp
               Yan Hou                                            Clin Trials Commun, 12: 1–8.


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023)                         17                          https://doi.org/10.36922/td.342
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28