Page 74 - TD-2-2
P. 74

Tumor Discovery                                                   SRT with SIP planning for synovial sarcoma



              One of the advantages in SIP is represented by the   surprising result achieved, there is also an important need
            formalization of dosimetric goals in overlap area, with the   to better understand the biological mechanisms impacting
            possibility of quantifying and comparing the amounts of   tumor control in the context of SIP planning.
            dose trade-off. On the other hand, one of the most critical
            aspects of SIP planning is represented by the uncertainty in   Acknowledgments
            tumor control in area of dose reduction.           We are greatfull with all medical physicist radioterapists
              This scenario planning was particularly challenging due to   and  nurse  at  our  institution  who  helped  in  planning,
            the high volume of overlap between PTV and internal margin   perfoming and managing side effects of the treatment.
            (IM) of the stomach (33 mL). Such a high-volume overlap
            was explained by the diffuse tumor abutment to the stomach   Funding
            and also by the high respiratory motion of the stomach itself,   None.
            despite the high-quality abdominal compression used and
            the indication of fasting for solid and liquids.   Conflict of interest

            3.2. Clinical considerations                       The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            Management of relapsed SS in a single site generally aims,   Author contributions
            whenever possible, to maximize radical probability through   Conceptualization: Marco Lorenzo Bonù
            chemotherapy and surgery. RT in such a context classically   Investigation: Marco Lorenzo Bonù, Eneida Mataj, Jacopo
            presents an ancillary role. Thanks to the new advances   Balduzzi,  Maria  Teresa  Cefaratti,  Gloria  Pedersoli,
            previously described, SRT is now an emerging treatment in   Gianluca Cossali, Luca Triggiani, Davide Tomasini,
            the management of metastatic sarcomas, due to a relatively   Michela Buglione, Stefano Maria Magrini
            higher response rate compared to normofractionated and   Writing – original draft: Marco Lorenzo Bonù, Eneida Mataj
            moderately hypofractionated RT. Early report showed that   Writing – review & editing: Marco Lorenzo Bonù, Eneida
            response rate is related to smaller lesion size (<5 cm) and low   Mataj, Jacopo Balduzzi, Maria Teresa Cefaratti, Gloria
            grade (G1). Limitations of the available studies include the   Pedersoli, Gianluca Cossali, Luca Triggiani, Davide
            small sample size, the heterogeneity concerning histological   Tomasini.
            subtypes, and the target sites that limit the applicability of
            study conclusions to all the pathologic entities in soft tissue   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            sarcomas . In fact, no studies have considered the role of
                   [31]
            SRT in the context of SS, and especially in critical sites such   Not Applicable.
            as upper abdomen.                                  Consent for publication
              The treatment outcome of complete response achieved   The patient signed an informed consent to use anonymized
            in our case is clinically significant because  the mass at   data for publication.
            first presented poor prognostic factors (size >5 cm, poorly
            differentiated, and critical site). In this case study, SIP   Availability of data
            planning proved to be safe and, despite the relatively short
            follow-up time, effective in achieving local tumor control.   Data are fully available under explicit request to the
            The results are particularly important given the huge area   corresponding author.
            of tumor-OAR overlap and the consequent low minimum   References
            doses delivered to some area of PTV.
                                                               1.   Khin T, Cyril F, 2014, Synovial sarcoma: defining features
            4. Conclusions                                        and diagnostic evolution. Ann Diagn Pathol, 18: 369–380.

            In this case report, a SS relapsed in a critical abdominal   2.   Fisher  C, 1998,  Synovial  sarcoma.  Ann Diagn Pathol,
            site was managed with SRT. SIP planning ensured safety   2: 401–421.
            concerning acute and late toxicity and achieved complete   3.   Jo VY, Fletcher CD, 2014, WHO Classification of soft
            tumor control, despite the huge trade-off between target   tissue tumours: An update based on the 2013 (4 ) edition.
                                                                                                      th
            coverage and the achievement of dose constraints      Pathology, 46: 95–104.
            objectives. This case underlines the importance of better   4.   Orbach D, Mc Dowell H, Rey A, et al., 2011, Sparing strategy
            clarification of the major determinants of tumor control   does not compromise prognosis in pediatric localized
            in RT planning. More data are needed to confirm SIP as a   synovial sarcoma: experience of the International Society of
            safe and effective planning modality. Moreover, given the   Pediatric Oncology, Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors (SIOP-


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023)                         6                           https://doi.org/10.36922/td.356
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78