Page 32 - TD-3-3
P. 32

Tumor Discovery                                                Adjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk melanoma



            improved 18-month RFS as compared to placebo (86% vs.   Consent for publication
            77%; HR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.45 – 0.82).  However, grade ≥3
                                          34
            toxicity rates were higher with pembrolizumab compared   This retrospective research was carried out using data that
                                                               were already available and fully anonymized. As a result,
            to placebo (26% vs. 17%). Based on this information, the   we did not seek specific consent from the patients. The
            FDA has approved adjuvant pembrolizumab for patients   use of pre-existing, anonymized data aligns with ethical
            with  Stage  IIB  and  IIC  melanoma  following  a  complete   guidelines, eliminating the necessity for individual patient
            resection.                                         consent in this context.
            5. Conclusion                                      Availability of data

            Despite the limitations of our study, including a small patient   Data used in this work are available from the corresponding
            cohort, the real-world data reinforces  the findings from   author on reasonable request.
            landmark clinical trials regarding the effectiveness and side
            effects of adjuvant ICIs therapy in patients with high-risk   References
            resected stage III and IV malignant cutaneous melanoma.   1.   Psaty EL, Scope A, Halpern AC, Marghoob AA. Defining
            The  encouraging  and  exciting  new  developments  in  the   the patient at high risk for melanoma.  Int J Dermatol.
            melanoma adjuvant treatment landscape suggest potential   2010;49(4):362-376.
            transformative impacts in the near future.
                                                                  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04381.x
            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Available from: https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer-
                                                                  types/melanoma/statistics [Last accessed on 2022 Jun 01].
            None.
                                                               3.   Keung EZ, Gershenwald JE. The eighth edition American
            Funding                                               joint committee on cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging
                                                                  system: Implications for melanoma treatment and care.
            None.                                                 Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(8):775-784.
            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1489246
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  4.   Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR,  et al. Melanoma
                                                                  staging: Evidence-based changes in the American joint
            Author contributions                                  committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.
                                                                  CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472-492.
            Conceptualization:   Mohammad  Usman   Hakeem,        doi: 10.3322/caac.21409
               Muhammad Adnan Khattak
            Formal Analysis: Gabriela Marsavela                5.   Sullivan RJ, Atkins MB, Kirkwood JM,  et al. An update
            Investigation: Mohammad Usman Hakeem, Afaf Abed       on the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus
            Methodology:  Mohammad Usman Hakeem, Muhammad         statement on tumor immunotherapy for the treatment of
                                                                  cutaneous melanoma: Version 2.0.  J  Immunother Cancer.
               Adnan Khattak                                      2018;6(1):44.
            Writing – original draft: Mohammad Usman Hakeem
            Writing – review & editing: Mohammad Usman Hakeem,      doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0362-6
               Muhammad Adnan Khattak, Afaf Abed               6.   Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Topalian SL, et al. Treatment of 283
                                                                  consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            cell cancer using high-dose bolus interleukin 2.  JAMA.
                                                                  1994;271(12):907-913.
            As this study is retrospective in nature, it focuses on the analysis
            of data that has already been collected in the past. Therefore,   7.   Atkins MB, Lotze MT, Dutcher JP,  et al. High-dose
            we did not seek ethics approval for this research. The data used   recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with
                                                                  metastatic melanoma: Analysis of 270  patients treated
            in this study were obtained from pre-existing records and   between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(7):2105-2105.
            did not involve any new data collection or interaction with
            participants. Moreover, our study did not involve the analysis      doi: 10.1200/jco.1999.17.7.2105
            of any biological samples, which would typically necessitate   8.   Atkins MB, Kunkel L, Sznol M, Rosenberg SA. High-
            specific ethical considerations and approvals. The absence of   dose  recombinant interleukin-2  therapy  in patients with
            such components further reduces the need for formal ethics   metastatic melanoma: Long-term survival update. Cancer J
            approval. Consequently, our study complies with the ethical   Sci Am. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S11-S14.
            guidelines for retrospective data analysis.        9.   Ives NJ, Stowe RL, Lorigan P, Wheatley K. Chemotherapy


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         8                                 doi: 10.36922/td.3143
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37